Virginia pro-gun rally draws crowds amid fears of violence
Comments
-
I shoot 30-06 and I’m in deep cover. Need the 30 caliber knock down power but also the stretch.
-
I have a 7mm STW when I need to really stretch.
-
I had to look that one up. lol.Sledog said:I have a 7mm STW when I need to really stretch.
-
Who fucking cares what you think? You're a fucking hasbeen nobody.YellowSnow said:
My mind is not changed.RaceBannon said:
BullshitYellowSnow said:
Sorry Sled, brandishing long guns out amongst the general public in urban areas is lame as fuck. They are for hunting, the range or home defense.Sledog said:
Comrade you seem upset! Settle down. This is how America works.BearsWiin said:
Buncha fucking paintballing weekend warrior triplechins protesting magazine capacity limits and background checksYellowSnow said:
I’m pretty sure you’re not a well regulated militia if you can’t run a sub 12 min mile. Christ.BearsWiin said:All is well for the moment at Richmond Redneck Cosplay
Wait til they start fighting over doughnuts
Waah waah I can't properly defend myself from TYRANNY without a banana clip
Black Panthers >>> Team Triglyceride
For you and the rest of the commies on here: -
I have a number of wildcat cartridges as well in rifles and one in a handgun. Kind of fun playing with odd stuff.YellowSnow said:
I had to look that one up. lol.Sledog said:I have a 7mm STW when I need to really stretch.
-
Relax. HH is a college football message board.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Who fucking cares what you think? You're a fucking hasbeen nobody.YellowSnow said:
My mind is not changed.RaceBannon said:
BullshitYellowSnow said:
Sorry Sled, brandishing long guns out amongst the general public in urban areas is lame as fuck. They are for hunting, the range or home defense.Sledog said:
Comrade you seem upset! Settle down. This is how America works.BearsWiin said:
Buncha fucking paintballing weekend warrior triplechins protesting magazine capacity limits and background checksYellowSnow said:
I’m pretty sure you’re not a well regulated militia if you can’t run a sub 12 min mile. Christ.BearsWiin said:All is well for the moment at Richmond Redneck Cosplay
Wait til they start fighting over doughnuts
Waah waah I can't properly defend myself from TYRANNY without a banana clip
Black Panthers >>> Team Triglyceride
For you and the rest of the commies on here: -
Gratuitous Grundle. That, and the not-soon-forgotten "fuck you" the other day ... what's going on with you my nega?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
We still homies? Homie?
PS: agree with the fetish assessment. -
Wolverines!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sledog said:
No I'm not. Never want to see that happen but that is why the right exists.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence. -
The site of Race's conversion. O-Town. Surprising surprise.RaceBannon said:I recall the tea party days in 2009. They were called racists and the GOP mainstream hated them. I had my corner office in Olympia high above Sylvester Park when they marched on the Capital. I went down to the street.
Regular working folks. Salt of the earth. And both parties hate them
Trump 2020 -
Fuck off again for good measure, because I can't remember what the other one was, but I'm sure it was for a good reason.creepycoug said:
Gratuitous Grundle. That, and the not-soon-forgotten "fuck you" the other day ... what's going on with you my nega?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
We still homies? Homie?
PS: agree with the fetish assessment. -
Alright. It's on.creepycoug said:
Gratuitous Grundle. That, and the not-soon-forgotten "fuck you" the other day ... what's going on with you my nega?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
We still homies? Homie?
PS: agree with the fetish assessment. -
DuckHHunterisafag said:
Who fucking cares what you think? You're a fucking hasbeen nobody.YellowSnow said:
My mind is not changed.RaceBannon said:
BullshitYellowSnow said:
Sorry Sled, brandishing long guns out amongst the general public in urban areas is lame as fuck. They are for hunting, the range or home defense.Sledog said:
Comrade you seem upset! Settle down. This is how America works.BearsWiin said:
Buncha fucking paintballing weekend warrior triplechins protesting magazine capacity limits and background checksYellowSnow said:
I’m pretty sure you’re not a well regulated militia if you can’t run a sub 12 min mile. Christ.BearsWiin said:All is well for the moment at Richmond Redneck Cosplay
Wait til they start fighting over doughnuts
Waah waah I can't properly defend myself from TYRANNY without a banana clip
Black Panthers >>> Team Triglyceride
For you and the rest of the commies on here:
-
[fuckoffbutton]GrundleStiltzkin said:
Fuck off again for good measure, because I can't remember what the other one was, but I'm sure it was for a good reason.creepycoug said:
Gratuitous Grundle. That, and the not-soon-forgotten "fuck you" the other day ... what's going on with you my nega?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
We still homies? Homie?
PS: agree with the fetish assessment. -
Disagree. I feel this was a good effert.creepycoug said:
The site of Race's conversion. O-Town. Surprising surprise.RaceBannon said:I recall the tea party days in 2009. They were called racists and the GOP mainstream hated them. I had my corner office in Olympia high above Sylvester Park when they marched on the Capital. I went down to the street.
Regular working folks. Salt of the earth. And both parties hate them
Trump 2020 -
Tyranny!creepycoug said:
Wolverines!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sledog said:
No I'm not. Never want to see that happen but that is why the right exists.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.YellowSnow said:
What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.RaceBannon said:
Who threatened arm resistance to the government?YellowSnow said:
It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.RaceBannon said:
You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kidsYellowSnow said:
Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
Its not 1994
You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was
They are coming to get the guns
Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up
Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries
For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.
I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence. -
I still have the first 30-30 I was given for my 12th birthday. Took my first deer with that rifle. Love it. These days I primarily use a 25-06, though I just purchased a 6.5 Creedmore last year and plan to use that next season to see how it does. For a woods gun capable of thumping bear I have a Browning BLR in .358 Winchester that I quite love, though it will wake you up quick when you shoot it.
-
This. If VA were to ban and confiscate (they won't because I think they got the message that the good ole boys in the hills will shoot first, give guns second), it could be decades before the SCOTUS took the issue up, if ever.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'd prefer legislators not trifle with civil rights with a "so, sue me" attitude. It took 33 years before Heller struck down the unconstitutional DC law. That's a long time.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then? -
-
There's something I find very cathartic about lever guns. Something about loading the cartridges into the tube and then cycling the lever. More fun to me than ARs going pop, pop, pop.Swaye said:I still have the first 30-30 I was given for my 12th birthday. Took my first deer with that rifle. Love it. These days I primarily use a 25-06, though I just purchased a 6.5 Creedmore last year and plan to use that next season to see how it does. For a woods gun capable of thumping bear I have a Browning BLR in .358 Winchester that I quite love, though it will wake you up quick when you shoot it.
-
Virgins dems kill bill targeting criminals with guns. Imagine that. Going to let them vote too.
https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/01/22/virginia-dems-bill-criminals-guns/ -
I have a lever gun fetish as well. They are just so light, trim, flat and handy. No one thinks twice about a lever gun when they see one.YellowSnow said:
There's something I find very cathartic about lever guns. Something about loading the cartridges into the tube and then cycling the lever. More fun to me than ARs going pop, pop, pop.Swaye said:I still have the first 30-30 I was given for my 12th birthday. Took my first deer with that rifle. Love it. These days I primarily use a 25-06, though I just purchased a 6.5 Creedmore last year and plan to use that next season to see how it does. For a woods gun capable of thumping bear I have a Browning BLR in .358 Winchester that I quite love, though it will wake you up quick when you shoot it.
Easily carried in the hand if you don't monkey them up with a scope. -
-
And there you have it. True agenda exposed.Sledog said:Virgins dems kill bill targeting criminals with guns. Imagine that. Going to let them vote too.
https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/01/22/virginia-dems-bill-criminals-guns/ -
That is a kewl gun. I'll give him that. @GrundleStiltzkin .50 cal?UW_Doog_Bot said: -
Yes.YellowSnow said: -
-
I had a Barrett .50 but it was the mag fed bolt action bullpup. Sold out to but other stuff. Just didn't use it much. A .50 is Moore of an anti-thing gun. Cars, trucks etc. It was fun for a while though!YellowSnow said: -
I don’t own any guns.
-
Well cowboy up!MikeDamone said:I don’t own any guns.
Unless you're a convicted felon then it'll be fun with Bubba the Love Sponge. -
I'd shoot my eye outSledog said:
Well cowboy up!MikeDamone said:I don’t own any guns.
Unless you're a convicted felon then it'll be fun with Bubba the Love Sponge.