Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Virginia pro-gun rally draws crowds amid fears of violence

1356

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    @MikeDamone and @RaceBannon nailed it. Thread over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    I'd prefer legislators not trifle with civil rights with a "so, sue me" attitude. It took 33 years before Heller struck down the unconstitutional DC law. That's a long time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,188 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    Which is all I fucking said in the first place, before getting gang raped in this thread for having the nerve to make fun of militia bros.



    We don't cotton racism here. Very much
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    edited January 2020
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government. The democratic process worked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,188 Founders Club
    One black Second Amendment supporter told Breitbart News: “I do not support in any way, shape, or form Governor Northam’s and the Democrats’ gun control. What I also don’t support is the fact that every news piece you’ve seen this weekend they’ve always brought up the issue of race as though it’s nothing but white rednecks and hillbillies out here who care for the Second Amendment, when actually black Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Americans in general care about the Second Amendment. I work a gun store part-time and I can’t tell you the number of customers I see of all races, all colors, all creeds, who care about the Second Amendment and who just peaceably live their lives, enjoy their rights and the Second Amendment. So, that’s why I’m out here and big media, mainstream media be damned, if you take a good look at me you can see that I’m a black American and all I’m out here for is to enjoy my Second Amendment rights. That’s why I’m here.”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    Which is all I fucking said in the first place, before getting gang raped in this thread for having the nerve to make fun of militia bros.



    We don't cotton racism here. Very much
    Props
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    The law didn't get rolled back. It was a 10 year bill and in 04, the presidency and both houses of Congress were controlled by Republicans. So they just let it expire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,188 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    Which is all I fucking said in the first place, before getting gang raped in this thread for having the nerve to make fun of people who make different life choices than I do, exercising their civil rights.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    Which is all I fucking said in the first place, before getting gang raped in this thread for having the nerve to make fun of people who make different life choices than I do, exercising their civil rights.
    I make fun of people everyday for making different life choices than me. What the fuck our we doing here anyhow? Did I say that their life choice should illegal? Christ.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,137 Standard Supporter
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Southerndawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    Just my 0.02 but IMO the last rifle ban raised a lot of awareness that ultimately led to the rollback of the law. Now, the semi automatic Armalite Rifle form is the most popular in the USA, and any attempt to grab it is bound to be met with a lot more resistance.
    ^^ That, bigly.

    In addition, 1994 vs. 2020 probably has some reportage or visibility bias. Less likelihood of grassroots efforts being seen.

    ATBS, tacticool cosplay is gay.
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=hot+tacticool+cosplay&FORM=HDRSC2

    Not so fast, fren.

    Kinda gay, yes. But there's a little Wood in there.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    RaceBannon said:

    One black Second Amendment supporter told Breitbart News: “I do not support in any way, shape, or form Governor Northam’s and the Democrats’ gun control. What I also don’t support is the fact that every news piece you’ve seen this weekend they’ve always brought up the issue of race as though it’s nothing but white rednecks and hillbillies out here who care for the Second Amendment, when actually black Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Americans in general care about the Second Amendment. I work a gun store part-time and I can’t tell you the number of customers I see of all races, all colors, all creeds, who care about the Second Amendment and who just peaceably live their lives, enjoy their rights and the Second Amendment. So, that’s why I’m out here and big media, mainstream media be damned, if you take a good look at me you can see that I’m a black American and all I’m out here for is to enjoy my Second Amendment rights. That’s why I’m here.”

    The brought props?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    edited January 2020
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    It was heavily armed white paramilitary groups that ended Reconstruction and created 100 years of Jim Crow. Only Federal troops staying in the South for decades could have ensured civil rights for the freed slaves. Ironic if you ask me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    It was heavily armed white paramilitary groups that ended Reconstruction and created 100 years of Jim Crow. Only Federal troops staying in the South for decades could have ensured civil rights for the freed slaves. Ironic if you ask me.
    Quit living in teh passed!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    It was heavily armed white paramilitary groups that ended Reconstruction and created 100 years of Jim Crow. Only Federal troops staying in the South for decades could have ensured civil rights for the freed slaves. Ironic if you ask me.
    So guns were needed to ensure civil rights for freed slaves?
    Yes, in the form of Federal troops with guns. Armed former slaves got massacred regularly during the Reconstruction period. They were outnumbered.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2020
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.
    Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.

    The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    What? It gets brought up here everyday- i.e., a well armed citizenry helps to ensure that we remain a republic free from tyranny.
    Sled is the armed rebellion fetishist.

    The real check is against the incremental creep governmental overstep, and the tyranny of dependence.
    This. Thank you, Grumble.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    It was heavily armed white paramilitary groups that ended Reconstruction and created 100 years of Jim Crow. Only Federal troops staying in the South for decades could have ensured civil rights for the freed slaves. Ironic if you ask me.
    So guns were needed to ensure civil rights for freed slaves?
    Yes, in the form of Federal troops with guns. Armed former slaves got massacred regularly during the Reconstruction period. They were outnumbered.
    So there are times guns are required to defend rights.
    Also a great example of the soft tyranny of dependence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,342 Founders Club
    edited January 2020
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    DJDuck said:

    Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/

    Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.

    The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
    Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.

    Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
    DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.

    They haven't shot anyone. HTH
    But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?
    Probably has to do with the fact that we live in a world where the media is far more populous in nature than then and people can self-organize more easily. Terrible things for democracy.
    Well, my fren, as a gun owner and 2nd amendment supporter I guess I am just fucking lost sometimes. So the point of dressing up in Army gear and toting ARs to the State Capital is to demonstrate a willingness of armed resistance against a tyranny of the majority coming from the DC era metro progressives? And yet just a few decades a go the Feds came for our? guns (1994) to an extent of which is incomprehensible in 2020 and yet no one did a god damned thing. I can't square in my head.
    You're just looking for a reason to mock something along with the cool kids

    Its not 1994

    You could make a plausible case that it wasn't a slippery slope but now we know it was

    They are coming to get the guns

    Americans stand up to the government and you shit on them. Another Mr Conservative
    It was winning elections that got the Assault Weapons Ban to expire. Not guys threatening armed resistance to the government.
    Who threatened arm resistance to the government?

    You are peddling the bullshit narrative that was given to you before anyone even showed up

    Black face racist governor down south have tried to disarm Blacks for centuries

    For fucks sake there are few thing more American than protests.

    I suppose we should have just elected our way out of Vietnam
    It was heavily armed white paramilitary groups that ended Reconstruction and created 100 years of Jim Crow. Only Federal troops staying in the South for decades could have ensured civil rights for the freed slaves. Ironic if you ask me.
    So guns were needed to ensure civil rights for freed slaves?
    Yes, in the form of Federal troops with guns. Armed former slaves got massacred regularly during the Reconstruction period. They were outnumbered.
    So there are times guns are required to defend rights.
    Yes, there are times when the State (with guns) has to defend the rights of minorities against armed militias (with guns).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter