Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
Disagree.
When CFB thinks of UW CFB thinks Jeff Crosby. It's right there in the tweet.
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
In all seriousness it's not about protecting UW, or about holding anyone to any standard, it's about crafting UW into their vision of what it should it be.
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
In all seriousness it's not about protecting UW, or about holding anyone to any standard, it's about crafting UW into their vision of what it should it be.
What do you mean by this? Whether they're going about it the wrong way or are right or wrong, it seems their vision of what UW should be is a team (I'm assuming you're referring to UW football and not the university as a whole) that wins at all cost, recruits ANY player that has elite physical talent, hires ANY coach who will do what it takes to win (with a heavy prioritization of recruiting over coaching), and reorganizes the program into an Oregonesque marketing machine for kids that also respects the traditions that the old timers won't let go (you know, so an impossible contradiction). Agree or disagree with this (put me in the latter camp), I don't see how it's inconsistent with the other two motivations on your list.
Edit for clarity: In their mind (I'm assuming, but it's a safe assumption), these twat likes could impact recruiting, and recruiting is their god. Their standard is to have 27 burner accounts so their personal life depravity and basement dwelling loserishness can't possibly impact recruiting in even the most minute way. So to get the program to conform to their vision, they believe an obscure assistant should be held to their standard of keeping a firewall between their crackpot personal life and possible recruits' eyeballs.
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
In all seriousness it's not about protecting UW, or about holding anyone to any standard, it's about crafting UW into their vision of what it should it be.
What do you mean by this? Whether they're going about it the wrong way or are right or wrong, it seems their vision of what UW should be is a team (I'm assuming you're referring to UW football and not the university as a whole) that wins at all cost, recruits ANY player that has elite physical talent, hires ANY coach who will do what it takes to win (with a heavy prioritization of recruiting over coaching), and reorganizes the program into an Oregonesque marketing machine for kids that also respects the traditions that the old timers won't let go (you know, so an impossible contradiction). Agree or disagree with this (put me in the latter camp), I don't see how it's inconsistent with the other two motivations on your list.
If they were trying to protect UW they'd address their concerns quietly.
So I twitter searched Aubrey Huff. And now know Jeff Crosby?
I do agree that Husky football should not be divisive but instead celebrated something we have in common in this increasingly segmented world we live in
I don't automatically think young possible DAWGS are on one side of the political spectrum or the other and that's the point. Why take the risk? Why risk losing one player. Its just stupid
I made my twitter account politics free and my increased followers are THANKFUL for it
So I twitter searched Aubrey Huff. And now know Jeff Crosby?
I do agree that Husky football should not be divisive but instead celebrated something we have in common in this increasingly segmented world we live in
I don't automatically think young possible DAWGS are on one side of the political spectrum or the other and that's the point. Why take the risk? Why risk losing one player. Its just stupid
I made my twitter account politics free and my increased followers are THANKFUL for it
Why even take the slightest of chance, is the urge to like an edgy tweet just too much? This isn't a fucking hobby, be professional
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
In all seriousness it's not about protecting UW, or about holding anyone to any standard, it's about crafting UW into their vision of what it should it be.
What do you mean by this? Whether they're going about it the wrong way or are right or wrong, it seems their vision of what UW should be is a team (I'm assuming you're referring to UW football and not the university as a whole) that wins at all cost, recruits ANY player that has elite physical talent, hires ANY coach who will do what it takes to win (with a heavy prioritization of recruiting over coaching), and reorganizes the program into an Oregonesque marketing machine for kids that also respects the traditions that the old timers won't let go (you know, so an impossible contradiction). Agree or disagree with this (put me in the latter camp), I don't see how it's inconsistent with the other two motivations on your list.
If they were trying to protect UW they'd address their concerns quietly.
They're not trying to protect UW.
Welcome to the millennial version of disagreement. Fester in a social media echo chamber with other like-minded dipshits until you all convince yourselves you're morally righteous and then proceed to bitch and moan until someone pays attention
Literally no one would’ve ever known about Crosby (who?) and his twitter account if not for these dipshits bringing it to light. If they actually cared they’d privately send a DM to someone in the athletic department... instead they blow it up on twitter and just use it as another reason to claim the “moral high ground”. Narcissists gonna narcissist
In all seriousness it's not about protecting UW, or about holding anyone to any standard, it's about crafting UW into their vision of what it should it be.
What do you mean by this? Whether they're going about it the wrong way or are right or wrong, it seems their vision of what UW should be is a team (I'm assuming you're referring to UW football and not the university as a whole) that wins at all cost, recruits ANY player that has elite physical talent, hires ANY coach who will do what it takes to win (with a heavy prioritization of recruiting over coaching), and reorganizes the program into an Oregonesque marketing machine for kids that also respects the traditions that the old timers won't let go (you know, so an impossible contradiction). Agree or disagree with this (put me in the latter camp), I don't see how it's inconsistent with the other two motivations on your list.
If they were trying to protect UW they'd address their concerns quietly.
They're not trying to protect UW.
Welcome to the millennial version of disagreement. Fester in a social media echo chamber with other like-minded dipshits until you all convince yourselves you're morally righteous and then proceed to bitch and moan until someone pays attention
The real question is if they would care if Crosby’s political likes and retweets were the opposite. I doubt they would have a problem with it, even tho like Race nobody getting paid and associated with UW football should be doing anything political on Twitter.
The real question is if they would care if Crosby’s political likes and retweets were the opposite. I doubt they would have a problem with it, even tho like Race nobody getting paid and associated with UW football should be doing anything political on Twitter.
The real question is if they would care if Crosby’s political likes and retweets were the opposite. I doubt they would have a problem with it, even tho like Race nobody getting paid and associated with UW football should be doing anything political on Twitter.
I suppose you'd have to define "the opposite." You may be promoting a false dichotomy here.
Just browsed a bit. I get it, someone associated and paid by UW shouldn’t be liking political and right wing stuff. Guess what else? No high school kid gives a shit or is worried about what that guy’s tweeting about. The UW fans tweeting about it (the everything matters dipshits) are bringing it into consciousness.
Wait... what?
We?re trying to get Jeff Crosby fired for liking some bad tweets.
Nobody knows who the fuck Crosby is. I didn’t until yesterday. Nobody has any opinion on West Coast football. It might as well not exist to over half the country.
Comments
When CFB thinks of UW CFB thinks Jeff Crosby. It's right there in the tweet.
Edit for clarity: In their mind (I'm assuming, but it's a safe assumption), these twat likes could impact recruiting, and recruiting is their god. Their standard is to have 27 burner accounts so their personal life depravity and basement dwelling loserishness can't possibly impact recruiting in even the most minute way. So to get the program to conform to their vision, they believe an obscure assistant should be held to their standard of keeping a firewall between their crackpot personal life and possible recruits' eyeballs.
They're not trying to protect UW.
I do agree that Husky football should not be divisive but instead celebrated something we have in common in this increasingly segmented world we live in
I don't automatically think young possible DAWGS are on one side of the political spectrum or the other and that's the point. Why take the risk? Why risk losing one player. Its just stupid
I made my twitter account politics free and my increased followers are THANKFUL for it
Pretty sure DDY is older than me though.