Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Thank you Chris Petersen

1246

Comments

  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,878 Swaye's Wigwam

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    One is a really good coach and one is average. Helfrich won a playoff game. It doesn’t make him good. Same with Rick and the Rose Bowl. We were trending down with Rick. We wouldn’t have went 6-6 and 1-11 like we did under Gilby, but Rick wouldn’t have made us good those years.
    Did Rick inherit the program Helfrich did?

    This is a "Larry Coker is part of the 2001 Canes" post.

    Caretakers aren't coaches.

    Rick won a Rose Bowl when the P10 wasn't such a shit ball. Both Oregon schools were good that year. Rick beat 2000 Miami. Pete doesn't have either credential.

    Fuck outta here with this shit guysms. In the pantheon of Husky coaches, it goes like this:

    Dobie


    DJ

    Owens

    [some other guysms]


    Rick








    Pete
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
    Have you started drinking already? it's 10:30 man. go sleep it off.

    This is a @backthepack - level type of argument.

    Do some basic research before addressing me.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,878 Swaye's Wigwam

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    One is a really good coach and one is average. Helfrich won a playoff game. It doesn’t make him good. Same with Rick and the Rose Bowl. We were trending down with Rick. We wouldn’t have went 6-6 and 1-11 like we did under Gilby, but Rick wouldn’t have made us good those years.
    Did Rick inherit the program Helfrich did?

    This is a "Larry Coker is part of the 2001 Canes" post.

    Caretakers aren't coaches.

    Rick won a Rose Bowl when the P10 wasn't such a shit ball. Both Oregon schools were good that year. Rick beat 2000 Miami. Pete doesn't have either credential.

    Fuck outta here with this shit guysms. In the pantheon of Husky coaches, it goes like this:

    Dobie


    DJ

    Owens

    [some other guysms]


    Rick








    Pete
    Rick was a 1 hit wonder. It was a great hit - don't get me wrong. He inherited a program that was 2 years removed from being ranking #3 in the country heading into the 1997 season. Pete inherited a program which hadn't been relevant nationally in 15 years. Washington making the CFP in 2016 was far more of a turnaround jerb that what Rick pulled off in 2000.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    One is a really good coach and one is average. Helfrich won a playoff game. It doesn’t make him good. Same with Rick and the Rose Bowl. We were trending down with Rick. We wouldn’t have went 6-6 and 1-11 like we did under Gilby, but Rick wouldn’t have made us good those years.
    Did Rick inherit the program Helfrich did?

    This is a "Larry Coker is part of the 2001 Canes" post.

    Caretakers aren't coaches.

    Rick won a Rose Bowl when the P10 wasn't such a shit ball. Both Oregon schools were good that year. Rick beat 2000 Miami. Pete doesn't have either credential.

    Fuck outta here with this shit guysms. In the pantheon of Husky coaches, it goes like this:

    Dobie


    DJ

    Owens

    [some other guysms]


    Rick








    Pete
    Rick was a 1 hit wonder. It was a great hit - don't get me wrong. He inherited a program that was 2 years removed from being ranking #3 in the country heading into the 1997 season. Pete inherited a program which hadn't been relevant nationally in 15 years. Washington making the CFP in 2016 was far more of a turnaround jerb that what Rick pulled off in 2000.
    It was also the product of playing in a fucking shit ball conference and you know it.

    You also know that going through the Pac 10 in 2000 was a far different animal.

    Bottom line: he coached his team to a win in the Rose Bowl when presented the chance. Pete shit himself in every NY6 bowl game he was in. The moments were always too big for him. THAT is what is going to be written on his tomb stone. I will see to it.

    Lost to Bamers
    Lost to Penn State
    Lost to Ohio State

    Only one of those three teams were elite. The other two were just good.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,878 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited December 2019

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    One is a really good coach and one is average. Helfrich won a playoff game. It doesn’t make him good. Same with Rick and the Rose Bowl. We were trending down with Rick. We wouldn’t have went 6-6 and 1-11 like we did under Gilby, but Rick wouldn’t have made us good those years.
    Did Rick inherit the program Helfrich did?

    This is a "Larry Coker is part of the 2001 Canes" post.

    Caretakers aren't coaches.

    Rick won a Rose Bowl when the P10 wasn't such a shit ball. Both Oregon schools were good that year. Rick beat 2000 Miami. Pete doesn't have either credential.

    Fuck outta here with this shit guysms. In the pantheon of Husky coaches, it goes like this:

    Dobie


    DJ

    Owens

    [some other guysms]


    Rick








    Pete
    Rick was a 1 hit wonder. It was a great hit - don't get me wrong. He inherited a program that was 2 years removed from being ranking #3 in the country heading into the 1997 season. Pete inherited a program which hadn't been relevant nationally in 15 years. Washington making the CFP in 2016 was far more of a turnaround jerb that what Rick pulled off in 2000.
    It was also the product of playing in a fucking shit ball conference and you know it.

    You also know that going through the Pac 10 in 2000 was a far different animal.

    Bottom line: he coached his team to a win in the Rose Bowl when presented the chance. Pete shit himself in every NY6 bowl game he was in. The moments were always too big for him. THAT is what is going to be written on his tomb stone. I will see to it.

    Lost to Bamers
    Lost to Penn State
    Lost to Ohio State

    Only one of those three teams were elite. The other two were just good.
    And I've already stated in this thread, that Ricky's game day corching in 2000 was better than anything we got out of Pete. However, all 3 of the above teams were vastly better than Purdue. 2018 Ohio State was an elite team talent wise. 2017 Penn State had the future NFL rookie of the year at RB and was like 4 pts away from the CFP.

    Did Chad Ward sit out the Rose Bowl in 2000 to stay healthy for the draft?
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
    Have you started drinking already? it's 10:30 man. go sleep it off.

    This is a @backthepack - level type of argument.

    Do some basic research before addressing me.
    What's his record in the title game?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    One is a really good coach and one is average. Helfrich won a playoff game. It doesn’t make him good. Same with Rick and the Rose Bowl. We were trending down with Rick. We wouldn’t have went 6-6 and 1-11 like we did under Gilby, but Rick wouldn’t have made us good those years.
    Did Rick inherit the program Helfrich did?

    This is a "Larry Coker is part of the 2001 Canes" post.

    Caretakers aren't coaches.

    Rick won a Rose Bowl when the P10 wasn't such a shit ball. Both Oregon schools were good that year. Rick beat 2000 Miami. Pete doesn't have either credential.

    Fuck outta here with this shit guysms. In the pantheon of Husky coaches, it goes like this:

    Dobie


    DJ

    Owens

    [some other guysms]


    Rick








    Pete
    Rick was a 1 hit wonder. It was a great hit - don't get me wrong. He inherited a program that was 2 years removed from being ranking #3 in the country heading into the 1997 season. Pete inherited a program which hadn't been relevant nationally in 15 years. Washington making the CFP in 2016 was far more of a turnaround jerb that what Rick pulled off in 2000.
    It was also the product of playing in a fucking shit ball conference and you know it.

    You also know that going through the Pac 10 in 2000 was a far different animal.

    Bottom line: he coached his team to a win in the Rose Bowl when presented the chance. Pete shit himself in every NY6 bowl game he was in. The moments were always too big for him. THAT is what is going to be written on his tomb stone. I will see to it.

    Lost to Bamers
    Lost to Penn State
    Lost to Ohio State

    Only one of those three teams were elite. The other two were just good.
    And I've already stated in this thread, that Ricky's game day corching in 2000 was better than anything we got out of Pete. However, all 3 of the above teams were vastly better than Purdue. 2018 Ohio State was an elite team talent wise. 2017 Penn State had the future NFL rookie of the year at RB and was like 4 pts away from the CFP.

    Did Chad Ward sit out the Rose Bowl in 2000 to stay healthy for the draft?
    Eh, Ohio State was very good though, though not Justin Fields elite. Different team this year. I don't know. The Bucks played without Nick Bosa too. There's always something to nit pick.

    The records are what they are. The hardest part of winning those games is getting there, and Rick had a much, much tougher slog in 2000 than anything Toothy has ever faced his entire career.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
    Have you started drinking already? it's 10:30 man. go sleep it off.

    This is a @backthepack - level type of argument.

    Do some basic research before addressing me.
    What's his record in the title game?
    Just shut up. You're out of your league here and wasting everyone's time.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
    Have you started drinking already? it's 10:30 man. go sleep it off.

    This is a @backthepack - level type of argument.

    Do some basic research before addressing me.
    What's his record in the title game?
    Just shut up. You're out of your league here and wasting everyone's time.
    Christ, I'm fucking around with the fact that there wasn't a championship game back then.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,937

    This is the most fucking anal tard cake debate of all time. Ricky's game day corching in 2000 bested anything that Pete did for us. But Pete's overall program building skillz (at multiple programs) crush anything Rick was capable of. For the love of Pete, let's try and keep this objective.

    In the words of Race Parcells: you are what your record says you are.

    Rose Bowl Wins

    Rick - 1

    Toothy Frat Boy - 0

    Cooked.
    Pete: 2 Pac Titles in 6 years = .333%

    Ricky: 1 Pac Title in 4 years (would have been 1 of 6 if hes stays) = .25%

    Pete: successful at 2 programs

    Rick: won initially with other dude's guys and then started to trend downward at 2 schools.

    Pete beat Stoops. Rick beat Purdue.
    ROSE BOWL WINS

    Rick Shit Talker = ONE WIN

    Toothy Frat Boy = ZERO


    'Nuff said.
    Pac-12 Championship Games:

    Neu: 0

    Pete: 2
    Terrible.

    The Pac 10 in 2000 was literally three times harder than Pete's most challenging season in the P12 and it's not close.

    Fuck outta here.

    Boom! Facts.
    Rick was never able to win the conference title game, that's just a fact.
    Have you started drinking already? it's 10:30 man. go sleep it off.

    This is a @backthepack - level type of argument.

    Do some basic research before addressing me.
    What's his record in the title game?
    Just shut up. You're out of your league here and wasting everyone's time.
    Christ, I'm fucking around with the fact that there wasn't a championship game back then.
    Ok!!!!!!!!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.