Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm hearing quid pro quo is out

124»

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,763 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    Who is investigating Trump?

    At least 4 of his opponents are in the Senate

    The DNC is investigating Trump

    Its not a crime

    4 dem senators threatened to withhold aide from Ukraine unless they looked into some things.

    Seems ok to the DNC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    I did a quick search on Romeny and the wall and illegals and found a mish mash of agreeing with Trump but not liking how Trump talks because he is divisive and racist

    Which is exactly what GOP voters are not looking for. More PC bullshit from alleged conservatives.

    Romney is a Senator now. Any legislation or leadership coming from him? 2024 beckons. Be a man Mitt
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    RaceBannon said:

    Romney had his shot and got his ass kicked by Candy Crowley

    Trump ran on revisiting all aid to foreign countries and to take another look at America funding NATO. Then he acted on it.

    We had idiots in bow ties who never got elected butt hurt that they don't run the show anymore. That's a policy difference not an impeachable offense

    Romney lacked the guts to do that. He's part of the problem

    Trump threatening military aid got the Complex up in arms. It is as simple as that

    Rats have been politicizing policy difference since Reagan, this is nothing more than a continuation of that trend. They tried to do this with Reagan and the tried it with both Bush I and II.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    SFGbob said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Swaye said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Swaye said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    Doogles said:

    There are so many low points for the Dems the past 4 years it's hard to choose, but this impeachment business might be the most embarrassing.

    It's like if the early 80s coked up SNL cast tried to hold an impeachment proceeding. I can't wait until Schifforbrains has to admit he coordinated with the whistleblower before all this. Doesn't really matter though, because the validity of this whole thing has already unraveled. Now we are just waiting to see if the Dems are stupid enough to hold an impeachment vote based on hearsay and democrat operative schemes. It's over Dems. You lost. Again.
    You do know it's like 6 minutes into the first quarter. Right?
    Their next batch of "witnesses" will have gotten the info 7th hand. The led with their "best" witnesses they hand selected in secret meetings in a basement. I can only imagine how great this will be in the Senate when everyone, including GOP witnesses, get called. Face it. It's over. Find another new scandal to pin your hopes on. Russia, Collusion-gate, Obstruction-gate and now Ukraine were all duds. Just keep trying. And failing.
    Hold on one cotton-picking minute there Slim. Can you show me 51 votes in the senate for a show trial? It’s more than plausible to expect Romney, Collins, Burr and Sasse to vote with the 47 dems for a REAL trial on the articles of impeachment.

    I knew Trumptards lose their shit over trump’s upcoming impeachment but I didn’t think it would such a meltdown after day 1.
    I have never cared What Mitt Romney or Susan Collins do. Don't much care now either. Takes a supermajority to convict. If you think you are going to find 20 RINOs to vote with that loser Romney, welp, good luck.
    Trump got elected, so winners win and all that. Romney would have been a better President rather easily. You still would have gotten all of your policy preferences with out all the baggage.
    I don't think Romney would have been strong on the border or taken on the Chinese (to be fair I thought Trump was ham fisted there but it seems to be working). Romney is a giant pussy as well. But yeah, less baggage for sure. But also less HondoBros meltdowns. And these meltdowns are pretty glorious.
    The illegals are still here. The wall isn't built. It's all symbolism over substance rhetoric thus far.

    I think Romney would have had a course correction on China too. Romney didn't want your guns either.

    The meltdown are glorious in the Tug. It's not good for the country.
    Progress is happening on the wall despite the Establishment united to stop it. The illegals were never being rounded up. Stop the flow and deal with what we have. Trump offered a DACA deal two years ago

    He's not the dictator his opponents claim. Congress plays a role here.

    Starting with Bubba through Obama there was lots of talk about illegals. Trump acted and became Public Enemy #1. It takes fortitude to stand up to the mob. None of the 16 GOP candidates had it. That's why Trump won

    To complain about his tone while ignoring the last three years of lies and abuse by his opponents strikes me as a bit short sighted
    If for nothing more than his cleaning up of the VA which has been a fucking shit hole for years under both Republican and Rat Administrations Trump has earned my vote. Obama had 8 years and the problems at the VA only got worse. Trump actually is doing something and he is getting zero credit for it.
    And don’t forget the new crime bill that no one talks about.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    Looks like I was right again

    https://foxnews.com/politics/dems-shift-rhetoric-from-quid-pro-quo-to-bribery-after-impeachment-focus-groups


    Goodbye “quid pro quo.” Hello “bribery.”

    Democrats are shifting the language they use to describe the allegations against President Trump in the House impeachment inquiry. And that change has come after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recently conducted focus groups to determine which description sounds more damning to voters, The Washington Post reported.

    The paper said the DCCC conducted these focus groups in key House battlegrounds and asked participants whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was more compelling. “Bribery” was determined to be more effective.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Looks like I was right again

    https://foxnews.com/politics/dems-shift-rhetoric-from-quid-pro-quo-to-bribery-after-impeachment-focus-groups


    Goodbye “quid pro quo.” Hello “bribery.”

    Democrats are shifting the language they use to describe the allegations against President Trump in the House impeachment inquiry. And that change has come after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recently conducted focus groups to determine which description sounds more damning to voters, The Washington Post reported.

    The paper said the DCCC conducted these focus groups in key House battlegrounds and asked participants whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was more compelling. “Bribery” was determined to be more effective.

    Both are impeachable offenses, does it matter what they call it?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Looks like I was right again

    https://foxnews.com/politics/dems-shift-rhetoric-from-quid-pro-quo-to-bribery-after-impeachment-focus-groups


    Goodbye “quid pro quo.” Hello “bribery.”

    Democrats are shifting the language they use to describe the allegations against President Trump in the House impeachment inquiry. And that change has come after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recently conducted focus groups to determine which description sounds more damning to voters, The Washington Post reported.

    The paper said the DCCC conducted these focus groups in key House battlegrounds and asked participants whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was more compelling. “Bribery” was determined to be more effective.

    Both are impeachable offenses, does it matter what they call it?
    Since the DNC did a focus group on what to call it I'm going to say yes, it matters. To the DNC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Looks like I was right again

    https://foxnews.com/politics/dems-shift-rhetoric-from-quid-pro-quo-to-bribery-after-impeachment-focus-groups


    Goodbye “quid pro quo.” Hello “bribery.”

    Democrats are shifting the language they use to describe the allegations against President Trump in the House impeachment inquiry. And that change has come after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recently conducted focus groups to determine which description sounds more damning to voters, The Washington Post reported.

    The paper said the DCCC conducted these focus groups in key House battlegrounds and asked participants whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was more compelling. “Bribery” was determined to be more effective.

    Both are impeachable offenses, does it matter what they call it?
    Since the DNC did a focus group on what to call it I'm going to say yes, it matters. To the DNC
    And?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    This is exactly how bad it’s going for trump in the impeachment inquiry.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.

    It has to occur to become a fact.

    Quit your day job before you send more innocent people to the gas chamber, idiot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,763 Standard Supporter
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.

    It has to occur to become a fact.

    Quit your day job before you send more innocent people to the gas chamber, idiot.
    As I've said I hope they don't discover the bribes promised to NK.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

    Because no aid was withheld or threatened

    But Trump

    Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.
    Pathological liar
    Senile dumbfuck Boomer
    Faggot
    Good one! You really got me there, boomer.
    You like the Big Bang Theory, don't you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter