I'm hearing quid pro quo is out

RaceBannon

Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump

CirrhosisDawg

This is exactly how bad it’s going for trump in the impeachment inquiry.

HHusky

Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.

RaceBannon

CirrhosisDawg said:

This is exactly how bad it’s going for trump in the impeachment inquiry.

Yep really bad

The sham is collapsing

Hurts Trump bigly

Bendintheriver

RaceBannon said:

Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump

Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.

We have the transcript of the call. No quid pro quo

So the pivot to bribery

Nothing there either

The change was for the low information team hondo

HHusky

Bendintheriver said:

RaceBannon said:

Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump

Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".

I’m a little hurt you haven’t been reading my stuff for the past couple of months.

Dude61

I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley

RaceBannon

State Department official George Kent testified Wednesday that he would “love” to see Ukraine look into the circumstances surrounding the closure of a probe tied to natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, while also raising concerns that Hunter Biden’s role on the board of that firm created the appearance of a conflict of interest.


Sounds like Kent agrees that Biden isn't above the law

HoustonHusky

It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...

CirrhosisDawg

HoustonHusky said:

It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.

RaceBannon

The people with first hand knowledge have already said there was no threat

Or bribery

Or quid pro quo

The transcript showed that when Trump released it

Bendintheriver

CirrhosisDawg said:

HoustonHusky said:

It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.

None of your witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why do you think that is cirrhosis? If they supposedly heard this information third hand, they certainly must know who heard it first hand. Again, why do you think that is cirrhosis?

RaceBannon

http://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1194660405907464194?s=19

Sledog

Dude61 said:

I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley

Works in court......

HHusky

Dude61 said:

I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley

That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.

HoustonHusky

CirrhosisDawg said:

HoustonHusky said:

It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.

All the adults read the transcript. Not sure what Jennifer said to you.

Teenage girls...

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley

That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.

We already know what the first hand witnesses said

No quid pro quo

RaceBannon

Imagine claiming you have a whistleblower then crying because people who actually heard the call said nothing is there

And your whistleblower is nowhere to be found

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley

That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.

We already know what the first hand witnesses said

No quid pro quo

Of course there was a quid pro quo. “Get over it.”

CirrhosisDawg

I touched a sensitive nerve here in trumptard land. Trump’s plumbers ignore subpoenas (Barr’s DOJ won’t enforce and court resolution would take months) and trump’s impeached with additional articles of obstruction. Or they could testify and clear everything up with first hand knowledge, right trumptards?