Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Election implications. Doesn’t help Trump IMO

Options
MikeDamone
MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
in Tug Tavern
For all those who think Trump will be re-elected with no problems, think again. State elections in Virginia and Kentucky show that the dependents of the Deep State do not want to have to work for benefits such as Medicare even when the costs are rising. They don't even want to have to work at all for getting these "free" benefits. Shows you where the dependent mindset lays. The 2020 elections will be difficult to win.

HondoBros? True?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-health-202/2019/11/06/the-health-202-mediciaid-work-requirements-were-defeated-at-the-ballot-box-last-night/5dc1bd3888e0fa10ffd20b7b/
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Options
    MikeDamone said:

    For all those who think Trump will be re-elected with no problems, think again. State elections in Virginia and Kentucky show that the dependents of the Deep State do not want to have to work for benefits such as Medicare even when the costs are rising. They don't even want to have to work at all for getting these "free" benefits. Shows you where the dependent mindset lays. The 2020 elections will be difficult to win.

    HondoBros? True?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-health-202/2019/11/06/the-health-202-mediciaid-work-requirements-were-defeated-at-the-ballot-box-last-night/5dc1bd3888e0fa10ffd20b7b/

    I think it's awfully warm out for November 2020. Bedsides, Trump wants to be the first president ever to be impeached then reelected. He will do anything he can to make this happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,304 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,304 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Options
    I like where this thread is going...time for the landowner class to rise up!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,304 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    Nah, we need to go back to men only. This shit is getting out of hand. They can run for office, but not vote. I think that is a fair compromise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,304 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    Nah, we need to go back to men only. This shit is getting out of hand. They can run for office, but not vote. I think that is a fair compromise.
    I'll have to chew on it a while.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 31,923 Standard Supporter
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    I'd exempt members of the military and law enforcement but I'd also add to this all other public sector employees.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 31,923 Standard Supporter
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    You already beat me to it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 42,429
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    Ban both the union and PAC money and this country likely has a chance of survival.

    If not, we fucked.

    Throw in term limits and we’re back off to the races.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2019
    Options
    Virginia is about to get a heavy dose of democrat fascism similar to what exists on the Left Coast with democrat supermajorities and governors canceling ballot measure election results that they don't like and doing the opposite of what voters have instructed them to do. They allowed the democrats to gerrymander voting districts and this is the result. The antifa brigade will be rolled out to bludgeon and intimidate anyone who opposes their agenda.

    Virginia voted in and continues to tolerate the leadership of a Governor who is on the record as supporting infanticide.

    Virginia deserves everything that is coming its way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Options
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Virginia is about to get a heavy dose of democrat fascism similar to what exists on the Left Coast with democrat supermajorities and governors canceling ballot measure election results that they don't like and doing the opposite of what voters have instructed them to do. They allowed the democrats to gerrymander voting districts and this is the result. The antifa brigade will be rolled out to bludgeon and intimidate anyone who opposes their agenda.

    Virginia voted in and continues to tolerate the leadership of a Governor who is on the record as supporting infanticide.

    Virginia deserves everything that is coming its way.

    But do they support 5G?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Options
    “The Antifa brigade”

    Greenshirtlaughingguy.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Options
    insinceredawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Virginia is about to get a heavy dose of democrat fascism similar to what exists on the Left Coast with democrat supermajorities and governors canceling ballot measure election results that they don't like and doing the opposite of what voters have instructed them to do. They allowed the democrats to gerrymander voting districts and this is the result. The antifa brigade will be rolled out to bludgeon and intimidate anyone who opposes their agenda.

    Virginia voted in and continues to tolerate the leadership of a Governor who is on the record as supporting infanticide.

    Virginia deserves everything that is coming its way.

    But do they support 5G?
    But do you support the white supremacist governor of Virginia? Why are you afraid to answer the question?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    Nah, we need to go back to men only. This shit is getting out of hand. They can run for office, but not vote. I think that is a fair compromise.
    Ok, I will agree to this, if you agree to making every recipient of government aid have to row 1000 M on the Concept II per $1.00 received. Again, the rowing machines will be hooked up to the power grid at discussed.
    I think that works. That was way they give back. We all agree everyone should give back n
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781 Swaye's Wigwam
    Options
    PurpleThrobber said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    YellowSnow said:

    What if we made it a requirement to vote that a citizen cannot current be receiving transfer payments at either the federal, state or local level?

    Or take it a step further. Only land owners can vote. MAGA
    I'm good with that, as long as we still allow female land owners to vote too.
    Why? A female would never own land unless a man gave it to her. Seems like that would just fuck everything up.
    There's a lot of smart, successful, high earning women out there these days. We want them voting.

    Oh, I'd also add public sector employees to my list. Sorry @Sledog but we can't have the government unions electing the folks that negotiate their contracts. I'm sure you'll understand.
    Ban both the union and PAC money and this country likely has a chance of survival.

    If not, we fucked.

    Throw in term limits and we’re back off to the races.
    It’s odd to me there are 535 people in this country who we know the names of, know where they live, but asking them to refrain from taking bribes is too tall of an order.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 31,706
    Options
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    insinceredawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Virginia is about to get a heavy dose of democrat fascism similar to what exists on the Left Coast with democrat supermajorities and governors canceling ballot measure election results that they don't like and doing the opposite of what voters have instructed them to do. They allowed the democrats to gerrymander voting districts and this is the result. The antifa brigade will be rolled out to bludgeon and intimidate anyone who opposes their agenda.

    Virginia voted in and continues to tolerate the leadership of a Governor who is on the record as supporting infanticide.

    Virginia deserves everything that is coming its way.

    But do they support 5G?
    But do you support the white supremacist governor of Virginia? Why are you afraid to answer the question?
    Of course ISD is a good comrade!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter