how do you alt-right fringe high school educated guys rationalize this one?

CirrhosisDawg

Take heart trumptards. McConnell says he’s “pretty sure” that after trump is impeached the senate will acquit him.

insinceredawg

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

The Ukraine meddling in our election hoax is Russian propaganda that you ate up just like Uranium One and Pizzagate. What a dumbfuck.

GDS

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

your opinion piece misrepresents when Biden made the request to Poroshenko pursuant to US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian anti-corruption advocate policy.

SFGbob

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

The Ukraine meddling in our election hoax is Russian propaganda that you ate up just like Uranium One and Pizzagate. What a dumbfuck.

You mean like Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress cocksucker?

GDS

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

The Ukraine meddling in our election hoax is Russian propaganda that you ate up just like Uranium One and Pizzagate. What a dumbfuck.

You mean like Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress cocksucker?

Still missing the Mueller memo release from Friday?

2001400ex

pawz said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

How is this materially different than Biden's "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?

That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.

pawz

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

How is this materially different than Biden's "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?

That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.

Boldface. Pathological. Liar.

SFGbob

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

The Ukraine meddling in our election hoax is Russian propaganda that you ate up just like Uranium One and Pizzagate. What a dumbfuck.

You mean like Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress cocksucker?

Still missing the Mueller memo release from Friday?

Read the report Scotty,

Dude61

"Updated" his testimony.

Sounds like a credible witness.

SFGbob

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

your opinion piece misrepresents when Biden made the request to Poroshenko pursuant to US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian anti-corruption advocate policy.

Actually the opinion piece links to the email exchange from 2016 that show Hunter Biden's name was invoked by Ukrainian officials as a reason why the State Department should help with ending the corruption probe.

2001400ex

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

How is this materially different than Biden's

That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.

Boldface. Pathological. Liar.

Show me the video where Biden said "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?

PurpleThrobber

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.

Got it. Makes total sense now.

2001400ex

PurpleThrobber said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.

Got it. Makes total sense now.

Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?

GDS

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/

your opinion piece misrepresents when Biden made the request to Poroshenko pursuant to US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian anti-corruption advocate policy.

Actually the opinion piece links to the email exchange from 2016 that show Hunter Biden's name was invoked by Ukrainian officials as a reason why the State Department should help with ending the corruption probe.

that's not what the email shows and Biden didn't make the Shokin request in March 2016 as your opinion piece states. He made the push during a Dec 2015 trip to Ukraine. Realize that's not as convenient for your timeline but sorry to let facts get in your way.

PurpleThrobber

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.

Got it. Makes total sense now.

Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?

There's 50,000 dollars facts per month that Hunter Biden pulled down. So, yes.

GDS

PurpleThrobber said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.

Got it. Makes total sense now.

Unfortunately the facts don't support that conclusion but if they did I'd have a yuge problem with it.

2001400ex

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

GDS said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.

But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.

Got it. Makes total sense now.

Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?

There's 50,000 dollars facts per month that Hunter Biden pulled down. So, yes.

Where is his work on a board illegal or impeachable?

UW_Doog_Bot

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

pawz

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

How is this materially different than Biden's

That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.

Boldface. Pathological. Liar.

Show me the video where Biden said "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?

That part of $1 billion dollars do you not understand?

CirrhosisDawg

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

ApostleofGrief

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Yes.

RaceBannon

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

ApostleofGrief

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

You couldn't hack college and dropped out. Not smart enough. I saw a lot like you.

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

You couldn't hack college and dropped out. Not smart enough. I saw a lot like you.

Hey too stupid to get into UW CWU guy. Who is your candidate?

Come on gutless. Spill it

I got into UW by the way. You didn't

CirrhosisDawg

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

DoogbotFS

RaceBannon

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

DoogbotFS

How much did you pay for the education that came up with that comeback? Is it too late for you to get a refund?

CirrhosisDawg

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

DoogbotFS

How much did you pay for the education that came up with that comeback? Is it too late for you to get a refund?

I paid for my Freshman-junior year tuition at UW. I won an academic scholarship my senior year for the full year’s tuition. I worked for a year afterwards and the received a fellowship to USC for graduate school (100% tuition plus a $500 month stipend in 1989-91). So I paid about $6,000 for a BA from UW and an MS from USC.

ApostleofGrief

@RaceBannon
Graduate before you pop off with snobbery

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

@RaceBannon
Graduate before you pop off with snobbery

Who is your candidate? Just because I got into UW and you couldn't is no reason to be bitter

Some guys needed college. I didn't

Its ok we really are not all equal. I'm better than you

RaceBannon

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.

Where did race get his college degree?

Obsessed much?

Olympia High

And as already proven, a 1970's high school grad is smarter than 99% of recent college grads

And I'm smarter than you.

I don't need a resume. I have results. Ty was two time national coach of the year. I doubt Saban has ever been

DoogbotFS

How much did you pay for the education that came up with that comeback? Is it too late for you to get a refund?

I paid for my Freshman-junior year tuition at UW. I won an academic scholarship my senior year for the full year’s tuition. I worked for a year afterwards and the received a fellowship to USC for graduate school (100% tuition plus a $500 month stipend in 1989-91). So I paid about $6,000 for a BA from UW and an MS from USC.

So like Ty you won coach of the year

And still suck