how do you alt-right fringe high school educated guys rationalize this one?

ApostleofGrief

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=785

You have to concede a quid pro quo was worked, but let me guess, it had nothing to do with the president right? It was a renegade lawyer only acting on his own? Correct?

Pitchfork51

ApostleofGrief said:

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=785

You have to concede a quid pro quo was worked, but let me guess, it had nothing to do with the president right? It was a renegade lawyer only acting on his own? Correct?

Don't care. Went on with my day. Had a fleeting thought that ur a fag.

Sledog

https://abc7chicago.com/conflicts-between-sondland-other-witnesses-in-impeachment-probe-raise-questions-/5660881/

Another partisan lying piece of shit. just like Schitt leaking this out when it's already been debunked. How do you feel being so stupid to have not even looked at anything but believing what Schitt says when he's a proven liar?

insinceredawg

ApostleofGrief said:

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=785

You have to concede a quid pro quo was worked, but let me guess, it had nothing to do with the president right? It was a renegade lawyer only acting on his own? Correct?

Trumptards in September: The Ukraine phone call was perfect and totally appropriate. Whistleblower is fake news!
Trumptards in October: Okay maybe Trump tried to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden but there was no quid pro quo!
Trumptards in November: Okay there was quid pro quo. Get over it!

ApostleofGrief

Sledog said:

https://abc7chicago.com/conflicts-between-sondland-other-witnesses-in-impeachment-probe-raise-questions-/5660881/

Another partisan lying piece of shit. just like Schitt leaking this out when it's already been debunked. How do you feel being so stupid to have not even looked at anything but believing what Schitt says when he's a proven liar?

That's just the testimony summary of what sondland and Volker said (witnesses) not Schiff.

PurpleThrobber

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

ApostleofGrief

insinceredawg said:

ApostleofGrief said:

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=785

You have to concede a quid pro quo was worked, but let me guess, it had nothing to do with the president right? It was a renegade lawyer only acting on his own? Correct?

Trumptards in September: The Ukraine phone call was perfect and totally appropriate. Whistleblower is fake news!
Trumptards in October: Okay maybe Trump tried to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden but there was no quid pro quo!
Trumptards in November: Okay there was quid pro quo. Get over it!

Next is create fall guys

SFGbob

Sledog said:

https://abc7chicago.com/conflicts-between-sondland-other-witnesses-in-impeachment-probe-raise-questions-/5660881/

Another partisan lying piece of shit. just like Schitt leaking this out when it's already been debunked. How do you feel being so stupid to have not even looked at anything but believing what Schitt says when he's a proven liar?

Weird how they are doing this with press releases and not by just releasing all the transcripts or holding the interviews in public. Like how Schiff was lying yesterday by claiming that Republicans were free to question the witnesses during the interviews while leaving out the fact that he and the Rats had veto power over what questions they could ask.

ApostleofGrief

SFGbob said:

Sledog said:

https://abc7chicago.com/conflicts-between-sondland-other-witnesses-in-impeachment-probe-raise-questions-/5660881/

Another partisan lying piece of shit. just like Schitt leaking this out when it's already been debunked. How do you feel being so stupid to have not even looked at anything but believing what Schitt says when he's a proven liar?

Weird how they are doing this with press releases and not by just releasing all the transcripts or holding the interviews in public. Like how Schiff was lying yesterday by claiming that Republicans were free to question the witnesses during the interviews while leaving out the fact that he and the Rats had veto power over what questions they could ask.

OK!

“It is clear from their testimony that, in exchange for the statement, President Trump would award the Ukrainian president with a highly coveted White House meeting and, later, with millions of dollars in critical military aid being withheld. Ambassador Sondland called this changing U.S. policy toward Ukraine a ‘continuum’ that became ever more ‘insidious’ over time.

MikeDamone

I think he should be impeached. I’m with the HondoBros

If not for this, then for other stuff he probably did.

It’s like when a bad guy gets executed for a crime it was found later he didn’t commit. Oh well, he was a horrible human anyhow.

ApostleofGrief

MikeDamone said:

I think he should be impeached.

Disappointed

Kaepsknee

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

MikeDamone

ApostleofGrief said:

MikeDamone said:

I think he should be impeached.

Disappointed

Why? I hate trump. Tariffs are shit.

ApostleofGrief

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

ApostleofGrief

MikeDamone said:

ApostleofGrief said:

MikeDamone said:

I think he should be impeached.

Disappointed

Why? I hate trump. Tariffs are shit.

OK!

Kaepsknee

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

ApostleofGrief

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

pawz

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

Fucking this.

As is EVERY negotiation.

pawz

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

ApostleofGrief said:

salemcoog said:

It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.

Both. Pay attention.

Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?

I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.

How is this materially different than Biden's "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?

PurpleThrobber

pawz said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

Fucking this.

As is EVERY negotiation.

Here...just take our billions in foreign aid because we are neato keen kind of guys..

Yeah, that’s how it’s gone down since WWII ...fuuuuuck.

insinceredawg

pawz said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Life is one big quid pro quo

Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.

Fucking this.

As is EVERY negotiation.

There it is. The clockwork shill now admits quid pro quo is okay as long it's his side doing it. So why did Trump repeatedly scream "NO QUID PRO QUO!" for the last couple months?