Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798

1235

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,572
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
    To the extent Daddy can’t be even more guilty of doing exactly what the call notes already show he was doing, I agree.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    This issue really has a great hook. I'm sure America is on the edge of its seat waiting to see what half baked scheme gets leaked next

    When will Nan call for a REAL vote so we can get this guy impeached!!??

    We need to see the transcript

    Here you go - nothing to see

    WE NEED A SPECIAL COUNSEL

    You do realize you people are clinically insane don't you?

    When Trump released the transcript it was time to move to the next fake scandal
  • Options
    ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
    Agreed.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,957
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,572
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    You need to say "Daddy" and "damning" more times. It's really strengthening your case.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,957
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
    So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,957
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I didn't attribute reason...I just stated the transcript recorded by 3-4 people in parallel during the call in coordination with a computer voice program somehow magically does not match what this guy wanted it to say so he tried to change it.

    At least you are admitting the transcript itself is a big thud...that's a big step for you in your mental state.
    You’re free to call the others to ask whether his corrections would have been inaccurate.

    The “transcript” doesn’t need the details he would have included in order to be damning.
    Yeah, I’ll call 3-4 transcribers working in parallel along with the voice recognition computer program and tell them they suck at their jobs and they need to add some stuff to their work because SchifforBrains can’t find anything on Russia Ukraine to pin on Trump.

    Moron...
    So Houston thinks someone at the White House scrubbed it and it wasn't just missing in transcription. Big if true!
    A response worthy of a HondoFSBro! I’m sure he is proud.
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    Trumptards are struggling hugely to oppose the impeachment they support.

  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited October 2019
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    Hmmmm


    That's not new. You guys floated this a week or so ago

    Pathetic
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,634
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    They make up Shit daily.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:

    Hmmmm


    That's not new. You guys floated this a week or so ago

    Pathetic
    You’ve gone from forgetting what day it is to what week it is? Sad.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Hmmmm


    That's not new. You guys floated this a week or so ago

    Pathetic
    You’ve gone from forgetting what day it is to what week it is? Sad.
    Good one!

    It's still not new

  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam



    Pathetic. September

    Pathological liars often can't keep the lies straight
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment




    Pathetic. September

    Pathological liars often can't keep the lies straight

    Ummmm did you not read what you posted because it doesn’t say the same thing as the current new story. This is embarrassing. For you.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Scott did you hear about this breaking news?


  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Scott did you hear about this breaking news?


    “Hey race, did you hear space x recently launched and landed the Falcon heavy?”

    “That happened in 1969 idiot! We went to the moon. It was on teevee.”
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:




    Pathetic. September

    Pathological liars often can't keep the lies straight

    Ummmm did you not read what you posted because it doesn’t say the same thing as the current new story. This is embarrassing. For you.
    It's the same thing

    You didn't read it

    September 27th the secret server and the transcript moved

    Pathological liar
Sign In or Register to comment.