Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798

2456

Comments

  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    That’s a helluva spin. You gals are shameless.
    At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.

    Seemed odd that according to the memo Zelensky tells Trump that they will look into the company he mentioned yet according to the memo Trump didn’t bring up a company.

    Pretty interesting take scotti. Normal people would have thought the fact Col Vindman broke our laws, shared classified information with who-the-hell-knows, fraudulently tried to change the content of the transcript himself, and the fact Schitf shut down cross examination of this gentleman, might have been a bit more interesting to you, but you go ahead and concentrate on the fact some company's name is not mentioned in the transcript.

    Way to keep your eye on the ball.
    BendMeOver is against sharing classified information. Yet bitches that the impeachment hearing is done behind closed doors.
    You fucking idiot, those are two completely different things. Impeachment hearing is being done behind closed doors strictly for rat political purposes. The daily leaks that obviously come from Schitf and the rest of the rats on the committee are clearly meant to violate their own closed door rule to their advantage. Like we have heard from many in those meetings, what is being deliberately leaked by rats from their own "closed door" meeting is misleading and many times completely false.

    What a fucking idiot you are.

    Come on now scotti. Step up to the bar and defend this piece of lying shit. Its what you libs do.
    Nice meltdown. Can't wait to watch your meltdown if Trump gets impeached.
  • Options
    BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,546
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    That’s a helluva spin. You gals are shameless.
    At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.

    Seemed odd that according to the memo Zelensky tells Trump that they will look into the company he mentioned yet according to the memo Trump didn’t bring up a company.

    Pretty interesting take scotti. Normal people would have thought the fact Col Vindman broke our laws, shared classified information with who-the-hell-knows, fraudulently tried to change the content of the transcript himself, and the fact Schitf shut down cross examination of this gentleman, might have been a bit more interesting to you, but you go ahead and concentrate on the fact some company's name is not mentioned in the transcript.

    Way to keep your eye on the ball.
    You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now. HTH
    Umm no. Another scotti lie. Keep em' coming big boy. Before you know it you will be at the same dishonesty level as your dream boat Hondo.
  • Options
    ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
  • Options
    BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,546
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    That’s a helluva spin. You gals are shameless.
    At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.

    Seemed odd that according to the memo Zelensky tells Trump that they will look into the company he mentioned yet according to the memo Trump didn’t bring up a company.

    Pretty interesting take scotti. Normal people would have thought the fact Col Vindman broke our laws, shared classified information with who-the-hell-knows, fraudulently tried to change the content of the transcript himself, and the fact Schitf shut down cross examination of this gentleman, might have been a bit more interesting to you, but you go ahead and concentrate on the fact some company's name is not mentioned in the transcript.

    Way to keep your eye on the ball.
    You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now. HTH
    Umm no. Another scotti lie. Keep em' coming big boy. Before you know it you will be at the same dishonesty level as your dream boat Hondo.
    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed but feel free to deny it all you want. You can go down with the ship as a true believer Trumptard that the most prolific liar to ever hold office is finally being honest with you. Fitting since you can't seem to go even a single post on an anonymous message board without lying...
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    That’s a helluva spin. You gals are shameless.
    At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.

    Seemed odd that according to the memo Zelensky tells Trump that they will look into the company he mentioned yet according to the memo Trump didn’t bring up a company.

    Pretty interesting take scotti. Normal people would have thought the fact Col Vindman broke our laws, shared classified information with who-the-hell-knows, fraudulently tried to change the content of the transcript himself, and the fact Schitf shut down cross examination of this gentleman, might have been a bit more interesting to you, but you go ahead and concentrate on the fact some company's name is not mentioned in the transcript.

    Way to keep your eye on the ball.
    You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now. HTH
    Umm no. Another scotti lie. Keep em' coming big boy. Before you know it you will be at the same dishonesty level as your dream boat Hondo.
    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed but feel free to deny it all you want. You can go down with the ship as a true believer Trumptard that the most prolific liar to ever hold office is finally being honest with you. Fitting since you can't seem to go even a single post on an anonymous message board without lying...
    Where the fuck do you get off giving anyone shit about lying Scotty? Have you admitted you lied your ass off about the staged photo? Fuck no, you've ran and hid like a fucking Kunt.
  • Options
    ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited October 2019

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2019
    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    What was suspected all long Scotty? What was left out?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    What was suspected all long Scotty? What was left out?
    That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    What was suspected all long Scotty? What was left out?
    That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
    Gosh I always assumed that any Ukrainian investigation in to Biden and his son would involve the company that was paying Biden's son. Did you need that spelled out for you?

    And why did you lie about the photo being staged and then lack the integrity to admit your head was up your ass? If I call you zero integrity piece of crap, but I don't include that I don't think very highly of you have I left something out by not saying that?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,567
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    Now we add "according to reports"

    Its pathological folks

    What reports from who? Schiff?

    We have seen the transcript. You'll never spin your way past that no matter how many lies you tell
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    What was suspected all long Scotty? What was left out?
    That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
    Gosh I always assumed that any Ukrainian investigation in to Biden and his son would involve the company that was paying Biden's son. Did you need that spelled out for you?

    And why did you lie about the photo being staged and then lack the integrity to admit your head was up your ass? If I call you zero integrity piece of crap, but I don't include that I don't think very highly of you have I left something out by not saying that?
    Don't you have to go back to lying about the bill that was sent to Obama cutting entitlements?
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,637
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    What was suspected all long Scotty? What was left out?
    That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
    Gosh I always assumed that any Ukrainian investigation in to Biden and his son would involve the company that was paying Biden's son. Did you need that spelled out for you?

    And why did you lie about the photo being staged and then lack the integrity to admit your head was up your ass? If I call you zero integrity piece of crap, but I don't include that I don't think very highly of you have I left something out by not saying that?
    Don't you have to go back to lying about the bill that was sent to Obama cutting entitlements?
    House passed a bill that cut entitlements. Harry Reid's Senate killed it. You lied and claimed no Republican supports cutting entitlement spending.

    I stated all of this yesterday and clarified my statement in real time. 9 months later you're still supporting this lie.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.

    That's the difference between me, someone with integrity, and you a pathological liar.
  • Options
    BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,546
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
Sign In or Register to comment.