Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Schiff witness vindman shared DJT call w/several people,likely violation of leakIng statute USC 798

1246

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,609
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,609
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    Yes yes of course only a moron can't see what you have failed for 6 months to explain about anything

    Daddy confessed. To an ever changing menu of unproven and made up out of thin air fake allegations

    Its not working

    Seriously give Schiff a hand. He is really struggling even while keeping it secret and changing the testimony
    Sounds like you’ve stopped trump’s impeachment now.
    Does it?

    Seems to be stopping itself quite nicely
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,609
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    What’s your hurry? It’s going to happen when Schiff says so. Not a minute earlier. There’s nothing you can do to stop trump’s impeachment and the triumphant reception it is receiving from the nation’s Trumptards.
    Bootlicker heard from
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,957
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    So if I say I went surfing, you wouldn't know it was in the ocean unless I said the word "Ocean." Got it.


    And of course you're lying about not thinking the photo was staged.

    Bob on full tilt. And can't provide a link to back up his lying ass.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    Yeah, the "confession" along with where he asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden is very damning.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    Yeah, the "confession" along with where he asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden is very damning.
    He just wanted a public announcement of an investigation. Manufactured dirt would be a bonus of course.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,670
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,670
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
    So your answer is No.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    You have no facts for yours why are you exempt?
    So your answer is No.
    I think his answer was go fuck yourself.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,957
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,609
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Apparently what was suspected all along has now been confirmed


    Apparently, suspected or confirmed. Choose one

    The language of pathological liars

    Nice team hondo has put together. Probably won't make a bowl this year but still

    ESL? OBK wants to deport you...
    Is it apparently true, suspected to be true or confirmed to be true

    It can't be all three

    Unless you're a pathological liar.
    It was suspected and Vinland confirmed it according to reports. Need more coffee this morning? Sucks getting old eh...
    I like how the left puts all their trust in criminals.

    He has zero credibility. None. Committed crimes. Attempted to alter an official classified document as well to say what HE wanted it to say.

    The TDS in you maroons is unbelievable.
    Vindman a 20 year member of the US military who received a purple heart in Iraq is suddenly a criminal with zero credibility because he testified in a matter detrimental to Dear Leader...

    Found a pick of sled the elephant!


    So a 20 year veteran distributes secret documents to people who have no reason or clearance to see it. Makes him a criminal. HTH
    Your claim. Got facts?
    He confessed

    Read the report

    You didn't read the report

    What transcript?

    There is no transcript
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,574
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    DJDuck said:

    Top Democrat Witness and Pompous Nutjob Col. Vindman Tried and Failed to Tamper with Rough Draft of President’s Call to Ukrainian President

    “FOX News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Colonel Vindman may have violated the federal leaking statute 18 USC 798 when he leaked the president’s classified call to several other opertaives.

    And now this…
    Vindman admitted during testimony that he tampered with and tried but failed to alter the transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President”



    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/wow-top-democrat-witness-and-pompous-nutjob-col-vindman-tried-and-failed-to-tamper-with-rough-draft-of-presidents-call-to-ukrainian-president/

    Who had DJ waiting all day for the Gateway Pundit to tell him why and how to smear a lifelong serviceman? That’s two in a row for anyone counting.



    Yeah, Gen Flynn says hello you hypocritical douche bag.
    Hey ATL, We know you have trouble staying on task, but is Col. Vindman a pompous nut job who tampered with a transcript?
    Yes, by his own admission.
    By your own admission, you’re a shameless lying sack of shit. At least you’re consistent.
    You can deny that he didn't show classified information to numerous other individuals and that he didn't try to fraudulently change the transcript but those are the facts.
    Correcting call notes, i.e. doing his job. Very nefarious.
    That is just pathetic

    And pathological
    There is no transcript, madam.
    Explains why all of you were initially demanding that it be released.
    Given that the notes confirmed the shakedown, why don’t we just call it “the Confession”?
    Why don't you add it to the Articles and vote then? You cracked the case
    Flattering, but only a fucking moron wouldn’t be able to see what’s plainly there to be seen. Even the GOP has moved on to its new slogan: “Inappropriate but not Impeachable”

    They’ll be putting it on red ball caps soon.
    That's why he needed to change the transcript then?

    You need to get your lies straight...
    The “transcript” is plenty damning even in its incompleteness. You really should try to remember your lines—it was “inappropriate” for Daddy to shakedown the Ukraine.
    If its so damning why the need to "fix" it again?

    Keep lying to yourself...we'll just blame your psychosis on your parental issues...
    Some people prefer completeness and accuracy to incompleteness and inaccuracy. Only you gals think he wanted to correct the record for political reasons. That’s called projection.
    I think his "corrections" are immaterial.
Sign In or Register to comment.