Should make Thanksgiving dinner among families of mixed politics that much more fun.
I would leave any social gathering where people thought it was okay to discuss politics in mixed company, even if I agreed with the political views being espoused.
probably smart for you. mix company usually doesn't take well to calling people kunts and conflating politics with your pedo fantasies
That's just my stage persona, in real life I can be civil But I'd happy to call you Kunt to your face if you like.
Should make Thanksgiving dinner among families of mixed politics that much more fun.
I would leave any social gathering where people thought it was okay to discuss politics in mixed company, even if I agreed with the political views being espoused.
probably smart for you. mix company usually doesn't take well to calling people kunts and conflating politics with your pedo fantasies
That's just my stage persona, in real life I can be civil But I'd happy to call you Kunt to your face if you like.
I have read it dipshit. It proves absolutely nothing other than schitf broke the law and got some dem plant to make an accusation through 3rd hand information. It proves nothing. The fact you would even post this article when you know that the dem plant is anonymous and has not been asked one question by anyone other than schitf and the dem lawyers he had write this document for the dem plant makes you look even more ridiculous. There is zero proof of anything.
I swear in all my dealings with democrats both personally and professionally, you idiots on here are the lowest goose stepping liberal morons I have ever seen in my life.
You asked for an article detailing the accuracy of the whistleblower's complaint. Nevermind that the IG testified under oath that the complaint was urgent and credible, I provided an article with annotations that you're too lazy or dishonest (or both) to refute. Instead we get treated to a dripping wad of your feelings on the matter.
Consider your sore snatch diagnosed.
It did not qualify as urgent. second and third hand bullshit never does. HTH
I have read it dipshit. It proves absolutely nothing other than schitf broke the law and got some dem plant to make an accusation through 3rd hand information. It proves nothing. The fact you would even post this article when you know that the dem plant is anonymous and has not been asked one question by anyone other than schitf and the dem lawyers he had write this document for the dem plant makes you look even more ridiculous. There is zero proof of anything.
I swear in all my dealings with democrats both personally and professionally, you idiots on here are the lowest goose stepping liberal morons I have ever seen in my life.
You asked for an article detailing the accuracy of the whistleblower's complaint. Nevermind that the IG testified under oath that the complaint was urgent and credible, I provided an article with annotations that you're too lazy or dishonest (or both) to refute. Instead we get treated to a dripping wad of your feelings on the matter.
Consider your sore snatch diagnosed.
It did not qualify as urgent. second and third hand bullshit never does. HTH
The document was written by rat lawyers. There has been zero cross examination. It is total garbage and that asshole who posted it is as dumb a sack of rocks for even trying to defend such a joke.
I have read it dipshit. It proves absolutely nothing other than schitf broke the law and got some dem plant to make an accusation through 3rd hand information. It proves nothing. The fact you would even post this article when you know that the dem plant is anonymous and has not been asked one question by anyone other than schitf and the dem lawyers he had write this document for the dem plant makes you look even more ridiculous. There is zero proof of anything.
I swear in all my dealings with democrats both personally and professionally, you idiots on here are the lowest goose stepping liberal morons I have ever seen in my life.
You asked for an article detailing the accuracy of the whistleblower's complaint. Nevermind that the IG testified under oath that the complaint was urgent and credible, I provided an article with annotations that you're too lazy or dishonest (or both) to refute. Instead we get treated to a dripping wad of your feelings on the matter.
Consider your sore snatch diagnosed.
It did not qualify as urgent. second and third hand bullshit never does. HTH
The document was written by rat lawyers. There has been zero cross examination. It is total garbage and that asshole who posted it is as dumb a sack of rocks for even trying to defend such a joke.
A lot of bluster and feelings to say you can't refute that its content has been largely corroborated. When presented with evidence, you goose step back into your talking points safe space and suck your thumb. Enjoy your shows today, Atl.
Don’t look now GayBob but nadler just bitch-slapped trump in federal court. The court ruled in favor of nadler and the judiciary committee this afternoon as trump sought to hide the mueller grand jury testimony. You should be used to all this losing by now though.
Don’t look now GayBob but nadler just bitch-slapped trump in federal court. The court ruled in favor of nadler and the judiciary committee this afternoon as trump sought to hide the mueller grand jury testimony. You should be used to all this losing by now though.
How many times have you fellated Nadler, CD? Jesus! Come up for air once in awhile.
Don’t look now GayBob but nadler just bitch-slapped trump in federal court. The court ruled in favor of nadler and the judiciary committee this afternoon as trump sought to hide the mueller grand jury testimony. You should be used to all this losing by now though.
Comments
Or not
Sad.