Hamdan
Comments
-
You know its fucking bad when you want Jonathan Smith back.
-
"We wanted to be stupid in that situation. We might have been a little too stupid. That's on me, it really is."GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Smith with eason would have probably been pretty goodCuntWaffle said:You know its fucking bad when you want Jonathan Smith back.
-
Right before that I was thinking another TD and then a stop and we’re seeing the young pups getting in.bananasnblondes said:The biggest thing was that stupid trick play. You just stopped them, have good field position, and need to waste clock. The game is essentially over and you give them hope by trying some stupid high risk bullshit to show off. Made no sense.
-
"...wanted to press the issue and score again, but USC blitzed"GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh, it's almost like USC knew THEY had to be aggressive, to try to create a turnover, sack, big stop, to have a chance to win. If only our staff could have possibly forseen them using such a rarely-employed strategy. But no way around it; could happen to anyone! -
I can buy off on part of that. But our receivers should catch what's thrown their way. And Eason has been accurate and throwing the ball in people bread basket. Our receivers didn't lose reps. And don't get me started on wut we can't develop stud receivers. Ross and Pettis aside of course.Fenderbender123 said:
Watching those drops in the CAL game I had to think that more reps with the WRs may have helped them get used to Eason throwing to them. One less drop in that game could have easily been the difference.2001400ex said:
Eason is good enough and had a ton of reps in practice last year. I liked trying to keep haener in it. Thinking he stays and starts next year. It was a strategy that didn't work. And I don't see that Eason has struggled from the less reps in practice. Do you?Doogles said:
Get 15 yards, kick a field goal, and it's a 3 possession game in the 4th quarter.PurpleBaze said:I was going to start a thread with the trick play as the topic, but I'll just poast here. Let me preface it by saying that I also blame Petersen for the offensive woes. He's a big boss and if he wants change on offense, he'll demand it.
Anyway, that trick play right after getting the ball on the 50 yard-line was completely unnecessary. You have a two-touchdown lead. Know the fucking situation. Put together a nice drive and get some points. That's how you put the final nail in the coffin. There's no need for a toss-sweep, double reverse, flea-flicker bullshit. It's not needed at that point. Plus, that shit works on less talented defenses that might have a tendency to over-pursue plays.
I'm focusing on one play, but it's really a little window at the small school Boise State mentality. Just line up and push their shit in. You don't need an explosive play at that point. You're in the driver's seat. Just take control of the game and #finish.
After that shitshow of a play, the win felt like a loss.
Eason is playing himself into a top 5 pick. There is no way in fuck you even joke about the competition being even with Haener. Pete preaches the importance of reps and then fucks off half of them at the most important position. Wtf are we doing on O???! -
Crisped.CuntWaffle said:You know its fucking bad when you want Tedford back in the booth.
-
Hey PETE
If you want to be "aggresive" I am OK! with that. FFS though use your elite for sure first round quarterback launching a piss missle at one of your massive sure handed WR/TE YOU FUCKING IDIOT! -
It’s not aggressive. You want to be aggressive, hit Hunter Bryant on a post or go deep to Puka.
-
I don’t understand we were moving the chains fine.







