Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Chicom Coolie Ding Dong Yang wants to Ban Air Travel

124

Comments

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    The $2.5 trillion reason we can’t rely on batteries to clean up the grid
    Fluctuating solar and wind power require lots of energy storage, and lithium-ion batteries seem like the obvious choice—but they are far too expensive to play a major role.



    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611683/the-25-trillion-reason-we-cant-rely-on-batteries-to-clean-up-the-grid/
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,650
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?
    On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.

    Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
    So what's the charge time for your Tesla? 14 years?
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited September 2019
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?
    On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.

    Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
    So what's the charge time for your Tesla? 14 years?
    Have you heard of a high speed charger? I know a few people that have driven thru Montana and such.

    It's ignorant people like you that are afraid of change that stifle advancement and technology.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Cancel all oil subsidies and we can talk about where the money should go.

    What subsidies do you want to get rid of? Tax breaks that every company gets?

    Oil is only vital to our way of life and economy. No big deal really.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,845
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    What oil subsidies? Don't hurt yourself. I know you leftards strongly feel there are massive oil subsidies. Love to hear about them.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    What oil subsidies? Don't hurt yourself. I know you leftards strongly feel there are massive oil subsidies. Love to hear about them.

    You and I could script their responses.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,650
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?
    On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.

    Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
    So what's the charge time for your Tesla? 14 years?
    Have you heard of a high speed charger? I know a few people that have driven thru Montana and such.

    It's ignorant people like you that are afraid of change that stifle advancement and technology.
    Really a house solar system high sorry charged at night? You are special!

    Driving up the 5 in Kali I see a while bunch of Tesla's. Parked at Harris ranch trying to charge because they're stranded.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?
    On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.

    Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
    So what's the charge time for your Tesla? 14 years?
    Have you heard of a high speed charger? I know a few people that have driven thru Montana and such.

    It's ignorant people like you that are afraid of change that stifle advancement and technology.
    Really a house solar system high sorry charged at night? You are special!

    Driving up the 5 in Kali I see a while bunch of Tesla's. Parked at Harris ranch trying to charge because they're stranded.
    What if you live in Wyoming, and it's the middle of winter and the temperature doesn't get above 15 degrees for a week. Is solar power going to generate enough energy to keep that house warm? Same question applies to living on the coast in the NW. There were times during the winter growing up on the Oregon coast were you didn't see the sun for weeks and it rained every day. What do those people do?
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,845
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Vote for free renewable solar then freeze in the dark.
  • Options
    UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,180
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?
    On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.

    Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
    This doesn't work at scale for business or industry. It barely works for residential. Full stop.

    Nuclear baseload, solar for daytime usage, and natural gas for ramp up or ramp down. Offset by reforestation and curbing desertification. These are the droids you are looking for.

    There's no other possible engineering solution with available technology unless you want forced rationing.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.
    Not quite true.

    The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.

    That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.

    And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.

    Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?

  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Cancel all oil subsidies and we can talk about where the money should go.

    Define 'subsidies'.

    The tax advantages oil companies get relative to accelerating exploration costs and depreciable assets aren't much different than the tax incentives renewable companies receive.


  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,650
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Solar on a massive scale should inl

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.
    Not quite true.

    The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.

    That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.

    And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.

    Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?

    More cow farts and it could be next week!
  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Member Posts: 1,526
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.
    Not quite true.

    The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.

    That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.

    And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.

    Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?

    There is a lot of promising battery tech comming down the pipe. I hope a different flavor of battery storage passes up Lithium Ion. Lithium mining is pretty shitty for the environment.

    There was a good Nat Geo article the other month about how one of the largest Lithium deposits lies in the world's largest salt flat in Bolivia, the Salar de Uyuni. It's a place where drug tourist go to trip and look at stars. I'm a strong supporter of battery tech but I'm an even stronger supporter of hallucinagenic drug trips in cool places.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,845
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    The US is undergoing reforestation and no desertification. That would be in noncapatilist countries.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    RedRocket said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Scale is the issue

    When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention

    Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s

    They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.
    Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
    I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.
    The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.
    Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.
    There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.
    Not quite true.

    The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.

    That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.

    And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.

    Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?

    There is a lot of promising battery tech comming down the pipe. I hope a different flavor of battery storage passes up Lithium Ion. Lithium mining is pretty shitty for the environment.

    There was a good Nat Geo article the other month about how one of the largest Lithium deposits lies in the world's largest salt flat in Bolivia, the Salar de Uyuni. It's a place where drug tourist go to trip and look at stars. I'm a strong supporter of battery tech but I'm an even stronger supporter of hallucinagenic drug trips in cool places.
    Not really. Reclamation projects in extraction industries are highly bonded This ain't the 70's when mining companies just walked away and left Superfund cleanup sites. Lots of times mines are replaced with golf courses or they fill up the pits with water and build homes/2nd homes around the new 'lake'. Whole different beast than the greenies want to portray.

    You're sorta getting into my wheelhouse here. Sort of. Extraction, money, joobs. Not necessarily in that order.

  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,845
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Most mining occurs outside the US. Think the chicoms are worried about reclamation?
  • Options
    GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    We aren't getting rid of fossil fuel power generation anytime soon and it's definitely not happening in any of our lifetimes.

    https://www.manhattan-institute.org/green-energy-revolution-near-impossible.

    LOL SFGbob's source is the Manhattan Institute JFC
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    We aren't getting rid of fossil fuel power generation anytime soon and it's definitely not happening in any of our lifetimes.

    https://www.manhattan-institute.org/green-energy-revolution-near-impossible.

    LOL SFGbob's source is the Manhattan Institute JFC
    And MIT but Kunt's got to Kunt. You really believe I can't find that exact same information from other sources? The numbers are what they are, they didn't make them up.

    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611683/the-25-trillion-reason-we-cant-rely-on-batteries-to-clean-up-the-grid/
Sign In or Register to comment.