Yeah, there's a 100 Million people living in those white areas. Scotty is such a lying piece of crap.
Ya - citing stats and facts is lying. It's 162.9 million Blob...fuck off.
I don't believe that number either. What's your definition of Broadband Internet?
Scotty the dumbfuck thinks there are a 160 million people living in those non-purple areas.
Because Verizon cell coverage is equivalent to 25 mbps min terrestrial based broadband...really flailing here Blob. Sad.
Fine you're stupid enough to believe that there are 160 million people living in the non-red areas of the map I posted.
Is this where I call you a dumbfuck for being unable to understand the Microsoft report?
Obviously Bob is trying to turn this into a gotcha moment and twisting definitions around to his favor. My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).
Obviously you didn't read who tried to twist the definitions around and are too much a of coward to contradict someone on your team. I didn't try to turn anything into a "gotcha." The dumbass claimed there are a 160 million people who don't have access to high speed internet. A claim that you, yourself have refuted. This isn't about me Owl.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
Now you don't know the meaning of the word refute?
re·fute /rəˈfyo͞ot/ Learn to pronounce verb prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob.
My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
Weird how I didn't lie about anything, while you lied claiming Owl had refuted my point with his Verizon 4G map showing 70% coverage in relation to a discussion about terrestrial land based broadband - sad to see you struggling so yugely.
"Using anonymized data that we collect as part of our ongoing work to improve the performance and security of our software and services, we found that 162.8 million people are not using the internet at broadband speeds. Our results align well with the FCC’s broadband subscription data and the Pew Research numbers, which suggests these data sets are far closer to the mark then the broadband access data reported by the FCC and leaves us with the unescapable conclusion that today there exists no accurate, comprehensive and public estimate of broadband coverage in the United States."
He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
Now you don't know the meaning of the word refute?
re·fute /rəˈfyo͞ot/ Learn to pronounce verb prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob.
My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).
Yeah, but he didn't "refute" you Scotty.
Nope he didn't - you're really melting down here Blob.
Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...
Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...
Well you've said all kinds of lies and bullshit Scott. Maybe if you call it a "meltdown" again it will magically turn your lying bullshit into the truth.
For some reason my earlier post got deleted but hell even the FCC report you posted which uses a completely faulty premise for determining "access" says the Report concludes broadband is not yet being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion
For some reason my earlier post got deleted but hell even the FCC report you posted which uses a completely faulty premise for determining "access" says the Report concludes broadband is not yet being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion
Which isn't the same as saying that 160 million people lack access to high speed internet but you keep fucking chicken Scotty.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.
Obviously you need a Federal program to provide you with greater internet speed.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.
So people lack access to an internet speed that most people don't need. But hey, Scotty the Republican says we should spend Federal tax dollars on it. You know what else people in rural areas lack? They don't have good entertainment and shopping options. I demand a Federal program!!!!
Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...
Well you've said all kinds of lies and bullshit Scott. Maybe if you call it a "meltdown" again it will magically turn your lying bullshit into the truth.
"all kinds" while you've yet to point out a single one. This is what I said 160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband and that is backed up by the Microsoft data posted here.
If we want to talk about bullshit and lies I could point to you claiming owl's map showing Verizon's 4G coverage being at 70% somehow refuted my point, but I don't want to interrupt your meltdown here...
I claimed that Owl was trying to refute you with that map. You claimed that he wasn't trying to refute you. Just because Owl is moron doesn't mean he wasn't attempting to refute you. My image refuted you, put you're a fucking liar and you just soldier on.
I claimed that Owl was trying to refute you with that map. You claimed that he wasn't trying to refute you. Just because Owl is moron doesn't mean he wasn't attempting to refute you. My image refuted you, put you're a fucking liar and you just soldier on.
no - you claimed owl refuted my point and i pointed out he didn't. Was he trying to refute it? Probably but that's not what you claimed. Should we keep going with this bullshit or are you just looking to get the last word in?
Comments
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
re·fute
/rəˈfyo͞ot/
Learn to pronounce
verb
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob.
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
Yeah, but he didn't "refute" you Scotty.
"Using anonymized data that we collect as part of our ongoing work to improve the performance and security of our software and services, we found that 162.8 million people are not using the internet at broadband speeds. Our results align well with the FCC’s broadband subscription data and the Pew Research numbers, which suggests these data sets are far closer to the mark then the broadband access data reported by the FCC and leaves us with the unescapable conclusion that today there exists no accurate, comprehensive and public estimate of broadband coverage in the United States."
If we want to talk about bullshit and lies I could point to you claiming owl's map showing Verizon's 4G coverage being at 70% somehow refuted my point, but I don't want to interrupt your meltdown here...