Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
MSNBC just two minutes ago...
Comments
-
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Did you wear your mask?HardlyClothed said:
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
Fuck Off. I'll give it three days before you return to your normal lying asshole self.CirrhosisDawg said:
This is sowing division ThudBomberFS. How is this helpful to creating unity?TurdBomber said:
Run along little man. This is a grownup argument.CirrhosisDawg said:All I see is division and disunity coming at a time when I hear we’re supposed to come together. Sad.
-
You’re pretty angry this morning. Exacerbated by your dementia?Sledog said:
A Pinko Faggot Commie talking about neo-Nazi's. That's special shit.HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
All Muslims are terrorists
-
This is such fucking horseshit. I can't believe the lengths you'll go to in order to perpetuate such falsehoods.HardlyClothed said:
One side was all neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. The other was leftists of various stripes. And yes they were the good guys at Charlottesville and whenever they confront the white supremacists. So Trump got it 50% right. Congrats.SFGbob said:
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
In Charlottesville at that Unite the Right rally in August 2017 there were no people who opposed removing the statue that weren’t neo-Nazi white supremacist confederacy humpers. Pretty easy to understand, dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Now all you have to do is establish that there were no people who opposed removing the statue who weren't Neo-Nazis. And you're dodging of the question regarding Trump calling Antifa "fine people" doesn't go unnoticed.HardlyClothed said:
He was clearly talking about the people in charlottesville. Not some abstract people on both sides of the issue. But we both know you’re intentionally playing dumb.SFGbob said:
What's the more logical conclusion, that Trump was calling people on both sides of the Statue issue "fine people" or that Trump was calling Neo-Nazi and Antifia fine people?HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
