Peak oil
Comments
-
Still wouldn't cut it on the Leceister boards.PurpleJ said:A lot of dumb shit gets said here, but this is right up there. Obama was one of the most pro-oil Presidents of all time and that jump in production is largely due to him.
Sad. -
Wow. Hondo Freudian Slips that he's a Catcher, too.2001400ex said:BendMeOver trusts journalists over CPAs on financial reporting matters. Nice work man.
-
And you trust journalists over actual scientific studies that you won’t not read.2001400ex said:BendMeOver trusts journalists over CPAs on financial reporting matters. Nice work man.
-
I definitely won't not read them Mike.MikeDamone said:
And you trust journalists over actual scientific studies that you won’t not read.2001400ex said:BendMeOver trusts journalists over CPAs on financial reporting matters. Nice work man.
-
Well, you haven’t so that’s true.2001400ex said:
I definitely won't not read them Mike.MikeDamone said:
And you trust journalists over actual scientific studies that you won’t not read.2001400ex said:BendMeOver trusts journalists over CPAs on financial reporting matters. Nice work man.
-
I always knew you preferred to watch.2001400ex said:J is destroying Bob in this thread. Best part is, Bob is still clueless about it.
#cuck -
I thought you were better than this.MisterEm said:
Holy shit, J. Stick to Tacoma tuff talk.PurpleJ said:A lot of dumb shit gets said here, but this is right up there. Obama was one of the most pro-oil Presidents of all time and that jump in production is largely due to him.
Production /= pro-oil.
Obama was anti-extraction for ANY raw materials. Obama made environmental consulting firms jizz with delight with the extra regulatory red tape added during his tenure.
Take a look at his commerce and interior appointees and then tell me he was pro oil.
HondoFS logic right here. -
-
Obama was only "pro-oil" if you live so far left that you believe "not doing enough to stop it" is the same as you know, actively helping the industry. JFC.
-
Obama was no friend of the resource extraction industries.PurpleJ said:A lot of dumb shit gets said here, but this is right up there. Obama was one of the most pro-oil Presidents of all time and that jump in production is largely due to him.
-
There was never an oil shortage and we foolishly brought up production to the point where President Obama had to lift the export ban. Gas prices came down when oil speculators were facing jail and massive fines and they picked up their ball and went home.
-
Obama wanted gas prices as high as possible to keep people from driving. He's that big an ass.HustlinOwl said:There was never an oil shortage and we foolishly brought up production to the point where President Obama had to lift the export ban. Gas prices came down when oil speculators were facing jail and massive fines and they picked up their ball and went home.
-
HustlinOwl said:
There was never an oil shortage and we foolishly brought up production to the point where President Obama had to lift the export ban. Gas prices came down when oil speculators were facing jail and massive fines and they picked up their ball and went home.
Obama prosecuted all of one entity for oil speculation and it was a case that was started under Bush and you've been informed of all of this numerous times, but just like Hondo, you just repeat your lies over and over again. I guess I should take this as a step forward since you did use to claim he put oil speculators in jail -
So then Obama and the Rats were lying when they said we couldn't drill our way out it.HustlinOwl said:There was never an oil shortage and we foolishly brought up production to the point where President Obama had to lift the export ban. Gas prices came down when oil speculators were facing jail and massive fines and they picked up their ball and went home.
Got it. -
Dodo doesn't do supply and demand or math. Dodo lies and loves to be lied to.
-
Yep, that's J, biggest leftie bastard I know.UW_Doog_Bot said:Obama was only "pro-oil" if you live so far left that you believe "not doing enough to stop it" is the same as you know, actively helping the industry. JFC.
-
NO BLOOD FOR OIL!!!!! MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!!!!GreenRiverGatorz said:
Yep, that's J, biggest leftie bastard I know.UW_Doog_Bot said:Obama was only "pro-oil" if you live so far left that you believe "not doing enough to stop it" is the same as you know, actively helping the industry. JFC.
-
If it’s a popular war you can do both.PurpleJ said:
MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!!!!GreenRiverGatorz said:
Yep, that's J, biggest leftie bastard I know.UW_Doog_Bot said:Obama was only "pro-oil" if you live so far left that you believe "not doing enough to stop it" is the same as you know, actively helping the industry. JFC.
-
The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless. -
The US is basically already there and Global Warming is a hoax but ok.Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless.
-
I know that’s what they tell you in Texas. Alternative facts.HoustonHusky said:
The US is basically already there and Global Warming is a hoax but ok.Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless.
I disagree with how Dems want to tackle it, though. Their solutions aren’t final. -
I’m against war.USMChawk said:
If it’s a popular war you can do both.PurpleJ said:
MAKE LOVE NOT WAR!!!!GreenRiverGatorz said:
Yep, that's J, biggest leftie bastard I know.UW_Doog_Bot said:Obama was only "pro-oil" if you live so far left that you believe "not doing enough to stop it" is the same as you know, actively helping the industry. JFC.
-
This is why nuclear needs to be a big part of the near futureMad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless. -
The EIA and Energy Dept are now in Texas?PurpleJ said:
I know that’s what they tell you in Texas. Alternative facts.HoustonHusky said:
The US is basically already there and Global Warming is a hoax but ok.Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless.
I disagree with how Dems want to tackle it, though. Their solutions aren’t final. -
PurpleJ said:
I know that’s what they tell you in Texas. Alternative facts.HoustonHusky said:
The US is basically already there and Global Warming is a hoax but ok.Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless.
I disagree with how Dems want to tackle it, though. Their solutions aren’t final.
Had to work it in, didn't you? BAMN. -
We had a really cold February. And now you're trying to tell me earth is getting warmer??Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless. -
I refuse to accept any green gaia global religionist as serious until they can tell me how much the US should spend and what it will accomplish. We spend tens of billions on sticking a corn byproduct in our gasoline so we can pretend that we are making a difference. There is no material difference in net CO2 emissions from using ethanol. The US produces 15% of the world’s CO2 while the chi coms produce about double of that. Our CO2 production is declining – largely as a result of using natural gas to produce electricity rather than coal. The chi coms are increasing CO2 production. The Euros, Indians and chi coms are still building coal plants. We aren’t.
If leftards were serious about reducing CO2 production we would be building nuclear power plants and fracking on federal lands and exporting massive amounts of LNG to Europe and Asia. But leftards are not serious and could give a crap about family wage jobs for Americans. The solution is for us to freeze in the dark. -
What could go wrong???? I miss the real lefties of the 60's and 70's that opposed nuclear energy.BearsWiin said:
This is why nuclear needs to be a big part of the near futureMad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless. -
Everyone does it is a running joke here but everyone does itGreenRiverGatorz said:
We had a really cold February. And now you're trying to tell me earth is getting warmer??Mad_Son said:The US has not and cannot drill it's way to energy independence. We still consume more than we produce. If our production increased to where we were an oil exporter, the price of oil would tank to where it was not profitable. We would need to have lower production internationally as well as increased production domestically. It is still a positive for the economy today if we produce more oil though.
Peak oil is a real concept insofar as at some point we will have produced more oil than at any other point. So far people have been terrible at predicting that point. Oil is a finite resource and we do produce it faster than it is created though, so we will get there even if we don't intentionally move away from oil due to non-economic factors.
Climate change is real and the globe is warming at an unprecedented rate because of human inputs to the atmosphere, among other factors. There is a real cost to the future in burning fossil fuels today.
Source: myself - I have a PhD in geophysics and experience in oil exploration and production at one of the largest oil companies in the world. The rest of you can fuck off if you disagree because your opinions are worthless.
That's the great thing about the weather. It will eventually prove both sides on anecdotal evidence
