Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Alternative theory: Why was Pete hired?
Comments
-
He likes sloppy tits.
Case closed -
We are waiting anxiously for you to fulfill your promise to LEAVE!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I think the thousands of reposts suggest otherwise there creep...but nice try. In other words 100x that of anyone else at HH;)creepycoug said:
You know pumpy, your contributions to this board are really quite average. You posts are pedestrian. Not the worst. There are some real retards here, so you're safe?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Well that's a waste of 45 paragraphs and 10hrs of your time Race
But your content is right in the middle of the bell curve. Not horrible, but not good at all. -
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dear. Wasnt it cool just to see purple sidelines in Pasadena again Stalin? Who cares who wonDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12 -
Doog loser!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dearDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12 -
Write a fucking paragraph Baze. You really are the most immature poster here. J used to hold that title. I dont respond to your dumbass anymore, but 20 1-2 word retorts from you deserves a response. 'Doog-loser' is the best you can do?PurpleBaze said:
Doog loser!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dearDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12
I just bought a brand new Polaris outlaw for my friends kid for her b-day Saturday. 7 years old. 1, it cost more than the car you squeeze in to your sardine parking spot in the bargain apartment complex you call home and 2, she can at least write a 7-word response on a message board. Now I know how you reached 18k posts. Pretty easy when you rapid-fire 50 1-word beauties a day for the 1 year you've been at HH -
I'm sure Jimmy Lake was thrilled to show you his participation ring while you guys caught up at the spring fling.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dear. Wasnt it cool just to see purple sidelines in Pasadena again Stalin? Who cares who wonDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12 -
Why are you so angry?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Write a fucking paragraph Baze. You really are the most immature poster here. J used to hold that title. I dont respond to your dumbass anymore, but 20 1-2 word retorts from you deserves a response. 'Doog-loser' is the best you can do?PurpleBaze said:
Doog loser!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dearDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12
I just bought a brand new Polaris outlaw for my friends kid for her b-day Saturday. 7 years old. 1, it cost more than the car you squeeze in to your sardine parking spot in the bargain apartment complex you call home and 2, she can at least write a 7-word response on a message board. Now I know how you reached 18k posts. Pretty easy when you rapid-fire 50 1-word beauties a day for the 1 year you've been at HH
When you write stupid shit like winning the Rose Bowl is irrelevant, there's really not much I need to say. Quit praising Petersen by comparing him to Sark & Ty. The Rose Bowl is not a stand-alone event. Petersen has dropped some games that he shouldn't have. The Rose Bowl was the third major bowl in a row that he blew out of his ass. Okay, we? probably weren't going to beat Alabama in 2016. But the showing against Penn State and Ohio State were terrible. With a halfway decent offense and not a galactically fucktarded QB, those games were winnable. Pete bringing in Browning as his golden boy and sticking with him for 4 fucking years was painful. On top of that, his offensive philosophy is too cutesy.
How much longer do we give Petersen? He's a decent coach, but this program needs to and can take the next step and actually win meaningful games and big bowl games.
Getting there is not good enough. Getting there and getting a participation trophy makes you a fucking doog loser.
Did I really have to explain this shit to you you imbecile? -
Ok baze, what coach in the pac 12 has got his team to 3 straight jan1 bowls in the last 20 years besides Pete Carroll and Chip Kelly (both hall of fame college coaches). That's rhetorical so dont bother answering. I credit you for trying to articulate in more than 2 words, but 2 words would have made more sense. You're kind of a dummy huh?PurpleBaze said:
Why are you so angry?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Write a fucking paragraph Baze. You really are the most immature poster here. J used to hold that title. I dont respond to your dumbass anymore, but 20 1-2 word retorts from you deserves a response. 'Doog-loser' is the best you can do?PurpleBaze said:
Doog loser!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dearDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12
I just bought a brand new Polaris outlaw for my friends kid for her b-day Saturday. 7 years old. 1, it cost more than the car you squeeze in to your sardine parking spot in the bargain apartment complex you call home and 2, she can at least write a 7-word response on a message board. Now I know how you reached 18k posts. Pretty easy when you rapid-fire 50 1-word beauties a day for the 1 year you've been at HH
When you write stupid shit like winning the Rose Bowl is irrelevant, there's really not much I need to say. Quit praising Petersen by comparing him to Sark & Ty. The Rose Bowl is not a stand-alone event. Petersen has dropped some games that he shouldn't have. The Rose Bowl was the third major bowl in a row that he blew out of his ass. Okay, we? probably weren't going to beat Alabama in 2016. But the showing against Penn State and Ohio State were terrible. With a halfway decent offense and not a galactically fucktarded QB, those games were winnable. Pete bringing in Browning as his golden boy and sticking with him for 4 fucking years was painful. On top of that, his offensive philosophy is too cutesy.
How much longer do we give Petersen? He's a decent coach, but this program needs to and can take the next step and actually win meaningful games and big bowl games.
Getting there is not good enough. Getting there and getting a participation trophy makes you a fucking doog loser.
Did I really have to explain this shit to you you imbecile? -
This.creepycoug said:
I'll let Race score that one, as he tends to be less emotional and biased about game analysis than I.PostGameOrangeSlices said:LIPO.
We were in the playoffs year 3 and half the team (defense) belonged, with far less talented players.
Respectable-ish losses the past 2 years in NY6 games.
I have to believe Pete will break through eventually because I really doubt another coach is going to do better.
Pete is winning at a historic clip. He just needs to break through on the big stage. With the way recruiting is trending I have to think he will. The offense is the concern, same as it was the past 2 years.
There were elements in all three losses of UW having its ass handed to it for a stretch. I gave Pete all the credit in the world for the half-tim adjustments that kept the PSU score respectable. But in all three, for a significant stretch of the game, UW looked outclassed.
You can't just concede an entire half of football to really good and athletic teams. So that's on somebody. I'll let you decide who, because I don't know.
And the other thing that provides important context is that he's winning at an historic clip in a conference that is now a shell of its former self. It is what it is; don't twist. I'm not playing the "USC is down"' or "Oregon is down" game. Most of the conference is what Oregon State and Cal used to take care of on their own. -
I'm not comparing Pete to previous Pac-10/Pac-12 coaches. I'm comparing Pete to the Sabans and Swinneys of the world. Can Pete get out of his own way and do what's necessary to elevate the program? Or is he going to stick to his Boise State offense and fuck things up when it counts?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok baze, what coach in the pac 12 has got his team to 3 straight jan1 bowls in the last 20 years besides Pete Carroll and Chip Kelly (both hall of fame college coaches). That's rhetorical so dont bother answering. I credit you for trying to articulate in more than 2 words, but 2 words would have made more sense. You're kind of a dummy huh?PurpleBaze said:
Why are you so angry?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Write a fucking paragraph Baze. You really are the most immature poster here. J used to hold that title. I dont respond to your dumbass anymore, but 20 1-2 word retorts from you deserves a response. 'Doog-loser' is the best you can do?PurpleBaze said:
Doog loser!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok Derek, get your buddy Sark back and wallow in 4-loss bowl games. You're as delusional as 98% of the 'dawgfans' here. Getting to a rose bowl is 99% the battle. Winning it is really irrelevant when it took 20 years to get back there with the coaches you think are better than Pete. Fuck o dearDerekJohnson said:"I'm not here to fucking hero worship a coach. I love Pete and I personally admire him, but we need Rose Bowl wins. There is no fucking reason we shouldn't have them. "
And NOW is the time to make hay while the sun shines upon a shitty Pac-12
I just bought a brand new Polaris outlaw for my friends kid for her b-day Saturday. 7 years old. 1, it cost more than the car you squeeze in to your sardine parking spot in the bargain apartment complex you call home and 2, she can at least write a 7-word response on a message board. Now I know how you reached 18k posts. Pretty easy when you rapid-fire 50 1-word beauties a day for the 1 year you've been at HH
When you write stupid shit like winning the Rose Bowl is irrelevant, there's really not much I need to say. Quit praising Petersen by comparing him to Sark & Ty. The Rose Bowl is not a stand-alone event. Petersen has dropped some games that he shouldn't have. The Rose Bowl was the third major bowl in a row that he blew out of his ass. Okay, we? probably weren't going to beat Alabama in 2016. But the showing against Penn State and Ohio State were terrible. With a halfway decent offense and not a galactically fucktarded QB, those games were winnable. Pete bringing in Browning as his golden boy and sticking with him for 4 fucking years was painful. On top of that, his offensive philosophy is too cutesy.
How much longer do we give Petersen? He's a decent coach, but this program needs to and can take the next step and actually win meaningful games and big bowl games.
Getting there is not good enough. Getting there and getting a participation trophy makes you a fucking doog loser.
Did I really have to explain this shit to you you imbecile?
