Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

#Tulsi2020

1568101117

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club

    "I think you had the director of the Department of National Intelligence at that time, James Clapper, who sat before the United States Senate and blatantly lied," Gabbard charged.

    "He was asked very directly, 'Are you collecting this information,' and he said 'no.' 'Are you collecting this information on American citizens' and he said, 'no.' And yet, he is somebody you see on TV almost every day as an expert in this country without any consequence lying to the American people."


    So was the surveillance of American citizens wrong or the lying about the surveillance of American citizens wrong?

    Personally, I'm not cool with abundance here.

    Spying on Americans is cool as long as @dflea signs off on it
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
  • ZoneUW
    ZoneUW Member Posts: 794
    I endorse Andrew Yang for President
  • ZoneUW
    ZoneUW Member Posts: 794
    salemcoog said:

    So you don’t know. That’s what I figured.

    ID politics is the gross exaggeration of claims of discrimination, mistreatment and marginalization to a group of individuals defined by race, gender, age, wealth or religion by a politician, pundit or poaster in order to avoid discussing real issues. It’s goal is to divide rather than seek solutions to problems that effect everyone.

    ID politics on the surface appears to provide support and solutions for those that are truly marginalized. But it’s true goal is to create deep divides by pitting,races, social classes, sexual preferences and even genders against one another with the main tools being false equivalencies, logical fallacies, gaslighting and flat out lies.
    So basically what you’re telling me is it’s the main political strategy of conservatives and white nationalists?
  • ZoneUW
    ZoneUW Member Posts: 794
    Tulsi is hot, but something is wrong with her skin. Still, she has a much better smile than AOC (who is still hot) and her breats, while more modest, seem to be holding together better than AOC’s while she ages.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    ZoneUW said:

    Tulsi is hot, but something is wrong with her skin. Still, she has a much better smile than AOC (who is still hot) and her breats, while more modest, seem to be holding together better than AOC’s while she ages.

    *tits
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,496 Standard Supporter
    ZoneUW said:

    Tulsi is hot, but something is wrong with her skin. Still, she has a much better smile than AOC (who is still hot) and her breats, while more modest, seem to be holding together better than AOC’s while she ages.

    AOC isn't hot.

    HTH

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter

    Gabbard likes Assad a little too much for my tastes

    Another idiot parrot.

    Oh, it's MTG. What a surprise.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    ZoneUW said:

    Tulsi is hot, but something is wrong with her skin. Still, she has a much better smile than AOC (who is still hot) and her breats, while more modest, seem to be holding together better than AOC’s while she ages.

    AOC isn't hot.

    HTH

    She’s politician hot.

    Low bar.

    Or has GayBob has worn off on you?