Harris' ain't going to manage to make it. Not being in the spotlight has been her biggest advantage. The more she's put under one the less people will like her.
Is this the episode where Rubin calls a KKK member a moderate?
Who cares? He's the interviewer. Did you not listen to the other 55 1/2 minutes where he's not speaking?
Or because he doesn't toe the extreme leftist Progressive central party line, his platform is taboo?
Politics
On The Rubin Report, Rubin consistently identifies as a classical liberal with libertarian leanings. Rubin previously identified as a progressive while he was affiliated with The Young Turks.
The show often focuses on criticizing elements within the progressive movement, which he refers to as the "regressive left",[16] a term coined by activist Maajid Nawaz.[17] Rubin has stated that "regressives are the left's version of the tea party"[18], and has characterized progressivism as a "mental disorder."[19]
Just went to her site and read her platform. Turned off by the SJW crap, liked the Veteran stuff, and then she, like all Dems, lost me with the assault weapon ban. Oh well. Maybe someday a Democrat will choose liberty over safety again, but I won't hold my breath.
Just went to her site and read her platform. Turned off by the SJW crap, liked the Veteran stuff, and then she, like all Dems, lost me with the assault weapon ban. Oh well. Maybe someday a Democrat will choose liberty over safety again, but I won't hold my breath.
I've been thinking about this quite a bit....and in full disclosure, the G&R Compound has no guns. Now, my two neighbors have a gazillion arms and invading forces have to go through their property to get to mine, so not too worried about things.
That said - and Jake Browning still does suck - The Throbber could support an outright ban on assault weapons IF and ONLY IF, military and police forces surrendered theirs within the borders of the US of A.
You need that shit to subdue bad guys in Afghanistan and parts unknown, fine. Then lock that shit up within the US at specified arsenals that can ONLY be released by a super majority of Congress AND signed into law by the sitting POTUS.
Until that happens, it's a non-starter. There's enough of a Constitutionalist in me to appreciate the strict definition of maintaining a militia - but there was never any intent by the Founding Fathers of an permanent army that, theoretically, could be turned against its lawful citizens during a time of upheaval.
Just went to her site and read her platform. Turned off by the SJW crap, liked the Veteran stuff, and then she, like all Dems, lost me with the assault weapon ban. Oh well. Maybe someday a Democrat will choose liberty over safety again, but I won't hold my breath.
This is fair critique.
I give her a bit of a pass on the normal DNC issues because:
1) she hot and would be great in bed 2) stopping anti-interventionist, bullshit wars is my #1 issue 3) she strikes me as pragmatic enough not to be carried down those rabbit holes with the loony left
Her apparant pragmatism is what keeps me hanging by a thread when I see position on assault rifle bans. I would like to think her fellow veterans would keep her from such drastic action. I could be wrong. Otherwise I'm all-in with you and throbber on that issue.
Just went to her site and read her platform. Turned off by the SJW crap, liked the Veteran stuff, and then she, like all Dems, lost me with the assault weapon ban. Oh well. Maybe someday a Democrat will choose liberty over safety again, but I won't hold my breath.
I've been thinking about this quite a bit....and in full disclosure, the G&R Compound has no guns. Now, my two neighbors have a gazillion arms and invading forces have to go through their property to get to mine, so not too worried about things.
That said - and Jake Browning still does suck - The Throbber could support an outright ban on assault weapons IF and ONLY IF, military and police forces surrendered theirs within the borders of the US of A.
You need that shit to subdue bad guys in Afghanistan and parts unknown, fine. Then lock that shit up within the US at specified arsenals that can ONLY be released by a super majority of Congress AND signed into law by the sitting POTUS.
Until that happens, it's a non-starter. There's enough of a Constitutionalist in me to appreciate the strict definition of maintaining a militia - but there was never any intent by the Founding Fathers of an permanent army that, theoretically, could be turned against its lawful citizens during a time of upheaval.
Comments
If Harris is the nominee she will be attacked for releasing felons in California under reform the state put into place
She's the prosecutor. Doubtful she picked individuals to fuck over
It's like calling Tulsi a baby killer for being in Iraq
It would be grimly funny if someone now goes after Gabbard for Iraq.
The image of her sucking off a 60 y.o. Willy Brown doesn't help her cause, either.
She's a swallower though.
If you are going to make a claim like that, link or stfu.
Or because he doesn't toe the extreme leftist Progressive central party line, his platform is taboo?
Politics
On The Rubin Report, Rubin consistently identifies as a classical liberal with libertarian leanings. Rubin previously identified as a progressive while he was affiliated with The Young Turks.
The show often focuses on criticizing elements within the progressive movement, which he refers to as the "regressive left",[16] a term coined by activist Maajid Nawaz.[17] Rubin has stated that "regressives are the left's version of the tea party"[18], and has characterized progressivism as a "mental disorder."[19]
Just went to her site and read her platform. Turned off by the SJW crap, liked the Veteran stuff, and then she, like all Dems, lost me with the assault weapon ban. Oh well. Maybe someday a Democrat will choose liberty over safety again, but I won't hold my breath.
That said - and Jake Browning still does suck - The Throbber could support an outright ban on assault weapons IF and ONLY IF, military and police forces surrendered theirs within the borders of the US of A.
You need that shit to subdue bad guys in Afghanistan and parts unknown, fine. Then lock that shit up within the US at specified arsenals that can ONLY be released by a super majority of Congress AND signed into law by the sitting POTUS.
Until that happens, it's a non-starter. There's enough of a Constitutionalist in me to appreciate the strict definition of maintaining a militia - but there was never any intent by the Founding Fathers of an permanent army that, theoretically, could be turned against its lawful citizens during a time of upheaval.
I give her a bit of a pass on the normal DNC issues because:
1) she hot and would be great in bed
2) stopping anti-interventionist, bullshit wars is my #1 issue
3) she strikes me as pragmatic enough not to be carried down those rabbit holes with the loony left
Her apparant pragmatism is what keeps me hanging by a thread when I see position on assault rifle bans. I would like to think her fellow veterans would keep her from such drastic action. I could be wrong. Otherwise I'm all-in with you and throbber on that issue.