#Tulsi2020

pawz

APAG can #yankoff to AOC all he wants, but anybody with a half-brain knows her, ummm..., ideas are completely untenable and unrealistic.

I grew up on the idea that you should vote for the best person regardless which side of the aisle. Plus #teamhondo #HondoBros will be vociferously opposed. Therefore ...

#Tulsi2020



https://youtu.be/cghitaCfOg4

Sledog

Those green new jobs plans worked great in Spain!

pawz

Sledog said:

Those green new jobs plans worked great in Spain!

What the fuck are you talking about?

allpurpleallgold

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

Southerndawg

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

Tulsi and Sandy are both left wing statists with fantasyland aspirations. Anyone supporting either is a dumb motherfucker.

PurpleThrobber

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

I'm willing to bet that by 2028, AOC has a better shot at slinging Old Fashioneds and Boilermakers again than being POTUS.

She no has no shot.

pawz

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You mad bro? Nice rant nonetheless.


Feel free to call me a one-issue voter: NO interventionist regime change wars.


HondoFS if you think AOC has a glimmer of hope at the white house. I would wager a large portion of my income against. But knock yourself out.

2001400ex

PurpleThrobber said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

I'm willing to bet that by 2028, AOC has a better shot at slinging Old Fashioneds and Boilermakers again than being POTUS.

She no has no shot.

Bartender smack talk? There's a lot of stuff to bag on her about, but now you are bagging on good hard work?

jecornel

Sam Harris is not fond of Tulsi....at all.

Southerndawg

jecornel said:

Sam Harris is not fond of Tulsi....at all.

Not surprising. Last go around he was "With Her", while Tulsi was "Feelin the Bern".

PurpleThrobber

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

I'm willing to bet that by 2028, AOC has a better shot at slinging Old Fashioneds and Boilermakers again than being POTUS.

She no has no shot.

Bartender smack talk? There's a lot of stuff to bag on her about, but now you are bagging on good hard work?

If she pours a nice Old Fashioned (sub rye, not bourbon - too sweet) and dance on the counter Coyote Ugly style, The Throbber is cool with dat.

Pretty sure she is a dental floss thong wearer and the Throbber's tip for service would fit nicely in her ass crack.*

*double entendre intentional.

Sledog

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You left out rebuilding every single building in the country so they are energy efficient. Should take 6 months.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You left out rebuilding every single building in the country so they are energy efficient. Should take 6 months.

Did you write your $600k check yet?

Pitchfork51

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

I'm willing to bet that by 2028, AOC has a better shot at slinging Old Fashioneds and Boilermakers again than being POTUS.

She no has no shot.

Bartender smack talk? There's a lot of stuff to bag on her about, but now you are bagging on good hard work?

If she pours a nice Old Fashioned (sub rye, not bourbon - too sweet) and dance on the counter Coyote Ugly style, The Throbber is cool with dat.

Pretty sure she is a dental floss thong wearer and the Throbber's tip for service would fit nicely in her ass crack.*

*double entendre intentional.

tip....nice

Sledog

pawz said:

Sledog said:

Those green new jobs plans worked great in Spain!

What the fuck are you talking about?

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/09/obama_green_jobs_con_job_and_the_ill_wind_that_blows_from_spain.html

https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/spains-experience-with-the-green-economy-save-the-planet-lose-some-jobs/

https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/the-nrels-flawed-white-paper-on-the-spanish-green-jobs-study/

allpurpleallgold

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You mad bro? Nice rant nonetheless.


Feel free to call me a one-issue voter: NO interventionist regime change wars.


HondoFS if you think AOC has a glimmer of hope at the white house. I would wager a large portion of my income against. But knock yourself out.

I’d be willing to bet AOC is also against interventionist regime change wars. Glad to know we can count on your vote.

allpurpleallgold

jecornel said:

Sam Harris is not fond of Tulsi....at all.

Who the fuck cares what Sam Harris thinks.

pawz

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You mad bro? Nice rant nonetheless.


Feel free to call me a one-issue voter: NO interventionist regime change wars.


HondoFS if you think AOC has a glimmer of hope at the white house. I would wager a large portion of my income against. But knock yourself out.

I’d be willing to bet AOC is also against interventionist regime change wars. Glad to know we can count on your vote.

Sorry to disappoint, but I can't vote for anyone with only two more brain cells than Hondo.

2001400ex

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

You mad bro? Nice rant nonetheless.


Feel free to call me a one-issue voter: NO interventionist regime change wars.


HondoFS if you think AOC has a glimmer of hope at the white house. I would wager a large portion of my income against. But knock yourself out.

I’d be willing to bet AOC is also against interventionist regime change wars. Glad to know we can count on your vote.

Sorry to disappoint, but I can't vote for anyone with only two more brain cells than Hondo.

Yet you voted for Trump.

UW_Doog_Bot

allpurpleallgold said:

This, right here, is why I think libertarians are the dumbest motherfuckers on earth.

Tulsi Gabbard is for Medicare For All, free college, she’s anti-intervention, wants to end Citizens United and for a $15 minimum wage.

She has a brutal criticism of the Green New Deal though. “It’s too vague”. Oh shit AOC, SLAMMED.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Off Fossil Fuels bill calls 80% of electricity sold to be clean energy, 80% of new vehicles sales must be zero emission vehicles, 80% trains to be electrified by 2027 and 100% by 2035.

AOC, let’s do 100% by 2030. Unrealistic! Untenable!

Tulsi let’s do 80% by 2027 and 100% by 2035. There we go, totally realistic and tenable.

What are you talking about.

The biggest difference between them is AOC will be president one day and Tulsi will not.

WTF does any of that have to do with libertarianism? A bunch of statist progressives arguing whether the state should control 99% or 81%. I guess that looks libertarian when you're a communist.

jecornel

allpurpleallgold said:

jecornel said:

Sam Harris is not fond of Tulsi....at all.

Who the fuck cares what Sam Harris thinks.

I like listening to smart people and who hates leftist Identity politics that has alienated most of America.

Man you are one salty dude.