Cohen testimony
Comments
-
"congressclowns"? why do you people talk this way?jecornel said:TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect? -
Got it. You were just making up bullshit.salemcoog said:
Im not working with the NYSD, so you would probably have to wait until those investigations conclude.CirrhosisDawg said:
“Certainly?” Why would SDNY care about his Congressional testimony? I’m sure you can explain.salemcoog said:
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
I am flattered that you believe me to be so omniscient, however. -
I think my favorite part so far was when Clay Higgins said he hadn't heard of Michael Cohen until today, thinking that he was insulting Cohen
-
We’re all criminals in some way. Any President worth their salt broke laws to get Shit done. Be it in prior life, campaigning and legislating. The trick is not to get caught.HHusky said:
I appreciate your concession that we've known Daddy is a criminal for ages. I recognize deplorables don't care.jecornel said:TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect?
I’d say that President Obama would be the exception as He never really aspired to accomplish much in office. Just take victory laps. -
No doubt there's a lot of things that I think that are wrong. The recognition of which is necessary for an open mind. I don't expect you to understand that. Good luck the rest of the way!CirrhosisDawg said:
There’s a lot you think that is objectively wrong. Including this.UW_Doog_Bot said:It seems like this should be a red letter day for the impeachment cheer squad and this thread is filled with bickering about other nonsense.
I thought this was the day the hammer dropped? Team LIPO wants to know. -
I get that when a thought process becomes more complex than Simple arithmetic for you, you wave the white flag.CirrhosisDawg said:
Got it. You were just making up bullshit.salemcoog said:
Im not working with the NYSD, so you would probably have to wait until those investigations conclude.CirrhosisDawg said:
“Certainly?” Why would SDNY care about his Congressional testimony? I’m sure you can explain.salemcoog said:
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
I am flattered that you believe me to be so omniscient, however. -
Are we all felons?salemcoog said:
We’re all criminals in some way. Any President worth their salt broke laws to get Shit done. Be it in prior life, campaigning and legislating. The trick is not to get caught.HHusky said:
I appreciate your concession that we've known Daddy is a criminal for ages. I recognize deplorables don't care.jecornel said:TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect?
I’d say that President Obama would be the exception as He never really aspired to accomplish much in office. Just take victory laps. -
lol i was rightsalemcoog said:
We’re all criminals in some way. Any President worth their salt broke laws to get Shit done. Be it in prior life, campaigning and legislating. The trick is not to get caught.HHusky said:
I appreciate your concession that we've known Daddy is a criminal for ages. I recognize deplorables don't care.jecornel said:TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect?
I’d say that President Obama would be the exception as He never really aspired to accomplish much in office. Just take victory laps.MariotaTheGawd said:I'm predicting the spin on fox news and then here 20 minutes later will be "everyone commits crimes" and then they'll go into turbo whataboutism mode
-
Complex? Like one house of congress reducing a criminal sentence? Or a US DA office considering testimony with no connection at all to its investigation in its sentencing recommendations? Complex like that?salemcoog said:
I get that when a thought process becomes more complex than Simple arithmetic for you, you wave the white flag.CirrhosisDawg said:
Got it. You were just making up bullshit.salemcoog said:
Im not working with the NYSD, so you would probably have to wait until those investigations conclude.CirrhosisDawg said:
“Certainly?” Why would SDNY care about his Congressional testimony? I’m sure you can explain.salemcoog said:
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
I am flattered that you believe me to be so omniscient, however. -
Lol someone from Salem with hot IQ smack talk
