Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”
Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”
Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”
Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”
Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”
Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”
Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”
Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”
Barbarians at the gate. Pete always talks about being out of his comfort zone. So hopefully he can walk the walk in that front. Caz it is just going continue to
Despite our broken fucktarded offense with shot receivers, Pro Football Focus has Eason graded out as the 11th best QB in the country.
Get him some fucking help and get out of his way.
No no no. Run the damn ball. Enough of this pathetic gimmicky throwing offenses. The midget wr can’t get open when an LB 50 pounds heavier is covering them (it is the match up you want, but they can’t get open)
Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”
Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”
Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”
Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”
Good article. It’s such a cop out to say in 2018 we played to the defense. It’s not mutually exclusive to be good at both. I understand playing conservative and playing to the defense, but that wasn’t why we couldn’t score in the red zone and why Pete fucked up the kicking game.
I blame Pete for Henry’s woes because no kicker can have confidence being treated like that. Pete was scared to kick a FG over 30 yards last year.
Brock had a quote about if Ahmed is getting better. He is and he really didn’t get too much of a chance to get going vs Stanford. It’s not his fault that Newton came in and looked incredible. Ahmed isn’t the problem. None of the RB’s are. They are a strength.
No identity, not running the ball more, and playing scared on offense. There isn’t any trust in what anyone is doing . That’s the problem.
Yes Peyton Henry is the biggest thing that bugs me. Something feels off about going from the worst Kicker in the pac12 to the best kicker in the pac12 in one season?
Nobody questions coaches knowledge. This is their careers and they are around it everyday. Bush knows football. I believe he puts in a lot of time and effort.
He’s not succeeding. Point blank. All the knowledge and effort is for naught if you can’t teach and improve the players to an appropriate standard. We are far below that standard and that’s all that matters.
Comments
Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”
Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”
Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”
Despite our broken fucktarded offense with shot receivers, Pro Football Focus has Eason graded out as the 11th best QB in the country.
Get him some fucking help and get out of his way.
I laffed. But it was a sad laugh.
https://media.giphy.com/media/6QcO20o5f3vlS/giphy.gif
I blame Pete for Henry’s woes because no kicker can have confidence being treated like that. Pete was scared to kick a FG over 30 yards last year.
Brock had a quote about if Ahmed is getting better. He is and he really didn’t get too much of a chance to get going vs Stanford. It’s not his fault that Newton came in and looked incredible. Ahmed isn’t the problem. None of the RB’s are. They are a strength.
No identity, not running the ball more, and playing scared on offense. There isn’t any trust in what anyone is doing . That’s the problem.
He’s not succeeding. Point blank. All the knowledge and effort is for naught if you can’t teach and improve the players to an appropriate standard. We are far below that standard and that’s all that matters.