Washington vs Oregon recruiting dick measuring contest
Comments
-
Holy fuck, that sure as shit takes some shine of that .97 rating. Kinda crazy that you can do a few underwear Olympics then not play a down and still get your knob polished by the teen boy expertsbananasnblondes said:
The Wright thing was weird and could e plain why UW didnt try try hard to flip him. From what I read, he did not play a down his entire senior year because he tried to transfer 3 different times. At one point, he tried to transfer back to his original school do he could play and the coach told him to fuck off.Peterman said:Delgado makes baccellia look like Megatron
Oh and wasn't someone here saying Wright was a dummy and might not qualify?
I also read something about him taking classes at a community college in Eugene to get his eligibility.
Funa was another guy that didnt play at all due to injury. -
Another factor into why Oregon's class is rated so high is because they have 5 players in the top 100 composite. The fact that two of them didn't play at all their senior year leads me to believe they're overranked.
#2 - Kayvon
#41 - Wright
#63 - Jonah
#68 - Funa
#94 - Pittman -
Nah - they're good. Those are good players. If you move them all down 100 spots, it's still a big time class. Don't be a Doog.insinceredawg said:Another factor into why Oregon's class is rated so high is because they have 5 players in the top 100 composite. The fact that two of them didn't play at all their senior year leads me to believe they're overranked.
#2 - Kayvon
#41 - Wright
#63 - Jonah
#68 - Funa
#94 - Pittman -
-
right after he acquiesced to Trautman, he called Gee Scott Jr.RaceBannon said:
-
The thread quality with Ballz and without is vastly different.
-
I'm genuinely surprised he hasn't posted in this thread yet. @StrongArmCobra you ok bro?greenblood said:The thread quality with Ballz and without is vastly different.
-
Comparing classes by comparing the position groups is fucking stupid. Teams have different needs each year.
-
Sorry but Pchuck said:
By a mile.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Nacua was a huge, huge addition and raises the overall grade of the class way more than a WR normally would. The need for dominant WR, in terms of taking that next step, is really glaring and he's that kind of talent. Pittman and Delgado are JAGS and not even comparable to him.chuck said:
By a mile.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Nacua was a huge, huge addition and raises the overall grade of the class way more than a WR normally would. The need for dominant WR, in terms of taking that next step, is really glaring and he's that kind of talent. Pittman and Delgado are JAGS and not even comparable to him.insinceredawg said:
Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?HillsboroDuck said:
Rather easily.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Davis isn't #2 though.
Sorry but Willhoite and Pittman are ranked higher than Nakua with Delgado right behind.insinceredawg said:
Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?HillsboroDuck said:
Rather easily.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Davis isn't #2 though.
With all due respect your overall recruiting class talent and returning WR talent is really sub par.
-
It’s not like we had 16 4 stars or anything!DJDuck said:Sorry but P
chuck said:
By a mile.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Nacua was a huge, huge addition and raises the overall grade of the class way more than a WR normally would. The need for dominant WR, in terms of taking that next step, is really glaring and he's that kind of talent. Pittman and Delgado are JAGS and not even comparable to him.chuck said:
By a mile.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Nacua was a huge, huge addition and raises the overall grade of the class way more than a WR normally would. The need for dominant WR, in terms of taking that next step, is really glaring and he's that kind of talent. Pittman and Delgado are JAGS and not even comparable to him.insinceredawg said:
Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?HillsboroDuck said:
Rather easily.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Davis isn't #2 though.
Sorry but Willhoite and Pittman are ranked higher than Nakua with Delgado right behind.insinceredawg said:
Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?HillsboroDuck said:
Rather easily.bananasnblondes said:
Puka is the best out of the group.insinceredawg said:With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.
Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
Davis isn't #2 though.
With all due respect your overall talent and WR talent is really sub par.








