Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Washington vs Oregon recruiting dick measuring contest

I know Doogs and Quooks will say they prefer their team's class over the other but even if I were to try to be objective, it's hard to say Oregon's class is better than ours. Their higher rating is driven primarily by larger numbers (26 vs 22 signees) and Thibs but when you look at position by position, the only areas the Ducks beat us straight up were at WR, TE, and on the edge. Our class is stronger in the trenches on both sides and in the secondary.

QB
UW: Dylan Morris (4*)
UO: Cale Millen (3*)
Edge: UW
UW had their pick between the two

RB
UW: Cam Davis (4*)
UO: Sean Dollars (4*), Jayvaun Wilson (3*)
Edge: Even
UW preferred Davis over Dollars but Ducks got their “big back” while we struck out on Charbonnet

WR
UW: Taj Davis (3*)
UO: Mycah Pittman (4*), Josh Delgado (4*), Lance Wilhoite (4*), JR Waters (3*)
Edge: UO

TE
UW: None
UO: Patrick Herbert (4*)
Edge: UO

OL
UW: Julius Buelow (4*), Nathan Kalepo (4*), Troy Fautanu (4*), Corey Luciano (3*)
UO: Malaesala Aumvavae-Laulu (4*), Jonah Tauanu’u (4*), Logan Sagapolu (3*)
Edge: UW

DL
UW: Faatui Tuitele (4*), Jacob Bandes (4*), Sama Paama (4*), Noa Ngalu (3*)
UO: Keyon Ware-Hudson (4*), Kristian Williams (3*), Suaava Poti (3*)
Edge: UW

OLB/BUCK
UW: Laiatu Latu (4*), Bralen Trice (3*)
UO: Kayvon Thibodeaux (5*), Isaac Townsend (3*), Brandon Dorlus (3*), Treven Ma’ae (3*)
Edge: UO

ILB
UW: Josh Calvert (4*), Daniel Heimuli (4*), Miki Ah You (3*), Alphonzo Tuputala (3*)
UO: Mase Funa (4*), Ge’mon Eaford (4*), Dru Mathis (3*)
Edge: UW

DB
UW: Trent McDuffie (4*), Asa Turner (4*), Kamren Fabiculanan (4*), Cam Williams (3*)
UO: Mykael Wright (4*), Trikweze Bridges (3*), Jamal Hill (3*), DJ James (3*)
Edge: UW

K
UW: Tim Horn (3*)
UO: Camden Lewis (3*)
Edge: UW
Oregon offered Horn before Lewis
«13456

Comments

  • KevininTacomaKevininTacoma Member Posts: 122
    UW got 14 4*s. Ducks had 12 4*/5*
    Ducks class is better due to volume
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    We lost

    Ducking doogs forget that the game won on the field
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited February 2019
    You have to bury Oregon in Seattle next year to keep your job.
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,745 Swaye's Wigwam
    haie said:

    You have to bury Oregon in Seattle next year to keep your job.

    You want to fire Petersen after he has built Washington into the 6th best program in the country?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club

    haie said:

    You have to bury Oregon in Seattle next year to keep your job.

    You want to fire Petersen after he has built Washington into the 6th best program in the country?
    Not even 10-2 top ten

    Heat up the seat
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,742 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    You have to bury Oregon in Seattle next year to keep your job.

    You want to fire Petersen after he has built Washington into the 6th best program in the country?
    @whatshouldicareabout rank top 10
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.

    Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,278

    With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.

    Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.

    Puka is the best out of the group.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,059 Swaye's Wigwam

    With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.

    Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.

    Puka is the best out of the group.
    By a mile.

    Nacua was a huge, huge addition and raises the overall grade of the class way more than a WR normally would. The need for dominant WR, in terms of taking that next step, is really glaring and he's that kind of talent. Pittman and Delgado are JAGS and not even comparable to him.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    I hate Dooging as much as the next person, but this is all true. There are like 4 guys total in Oregon's class that we would prefer to the same guy in ours. That doesn't mean theirs sucks, tho.

    But it does mean their class isn't better than ours. And it isn't.

    Is Cale Millen one of the 4?
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.

    Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.

    Puka is the best out of the group.
    Rather easily.

    Davis isn't #2 though.
    Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?

  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam

    With the addition of Puka, I'm calling it a tie for WR recruiting. Yes the Ducks got four WRs including three 4* but I think among the six WRs signed between the two schools, Puka and Davis were our top two. And if the recruiting analysts are to be believed, we passed on both Pittman and Delgado.

    Position by position UW wins 6-2-2 with the two losses at TE and OLB/BUCK.

    Puka is the best out of the group.
    Rather easily.

    Davis isn't #2 though.
    Not in the rankings but I think he was higher on the coaches' board than the other guys. Didn't we accept his commitment around the same time we started to "cool" on Delgado and Pittman?

    Yeah - I think the way we had WRs ranked, Davis was higher than Delgado or Pittman for us. I personally like Pittman better, but I always thought Delgado and Dollars were really not that good.

    I think the guys OUR STAFF would swap go like this...

    I think we'd take Jonah T as an add on, not as a swap. Kayvon and Ma'ae we would've taken over Trice I think. Though Ma'ae is a little confusing. Funa we liked, but he doesn't really fit our D - would we take him over Trice? Probably? Maybe.

    Mykael Wright we would've taken over KamFab, pretty sure about that.

    So, Kayvon's a weird one because of OKG shit, but if we could just have him, duh we'd take him.

    I'd say the final verdict is that we would've taken Jonah, Kayvon, Maybe Funa, maybe Ma'ae and Wright.
    Talent only considered Kayvon no question.

    All the other baggage? It's all speculation that none of us are ever likely to know for sure.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861
    Eaford sucks, he’s small and slow.


    Wilhoite is good.
Sign In or Register to comment.