Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent.
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.
Read the book.
Don't take my word for it.
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
There is so much to break down it took 1/4 of the book. I really don't want to rehash it all.
"Robo-calls" only scratch the surface of the fraud that was going on.
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
There is no way a handful of isolated incidents could have created a global economic disaster. It was certainly endemic.
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.
Read the book.
Don't take my word for it.
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.
Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent.
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.
No you just quoted me and said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.
Read the book.
Don't take my word for it.
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.
Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent.
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.
Appears Pawz just cut your legs out from underneath you dumbfuck. Your pals are all here I'm one of them will console you with an ass tonguing.
Fine. I'm a mysogenist then. But that doesn't change the fact that Kamala has a face like a bloodhound and a grating, whiny voice that sounds like a starving cat. And look at those man hands. JFC.
I'd hit it. Without a doubt. It's what separates us from women. We can hit that which we hate with terrible enthusiasm. Ask @PurpleThrobber . He'll tell you.
Agreed. The Throbber will never deny one's right to wood hit any individual with even a remote hint of celebrity.
And a Presidential Candidate definitely falls into that realm.
I"m thinking she was even halfway doable back in the day. Much like Pelosi's ample ta tas.
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.
Read the book.
Don't take my word for it.
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.
And you think that story represent a significant number of all the bank foreclosures? I concede there were most certainly some rare examples where what you were claiming had occurred. Big country millions of mortgages certainly errors like that are going to be made. But that was far for normal.
Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent.
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.
Appears Pawz just cut your legs out from underneath you dumbfuck. Your pals are all here I'm one of them will console you with an ass tonguing.
That’s some mighty fine “evidence.” You’ll do better tomorrow GayBob. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Come see Gaybob do his best Hondo in every thread.
He's not going to read anything. That would take time away from his sniveling cunt act.
Come on flea you can shove that head even further up your ass.
So far we've got a single example of the BofA fucking up the paper work and foreclosing on a single party that wasn't behind on their mortgage. And this case was dealt with fairly quickly by the court and they not only didn't lose their home they got a judgment against BofA.
Still waiting for all of those other examples you Kunt claimed were happening all the time.
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.
Read the book.
Don't take my word for it.
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
Completely agree with this. Lending companies should have never been issuing those loans and would have never been able to write those kinds of loans if there had never been the creation of Freddie and Fannie.
But the truth of the matter is all of mortgages that were eventually foreclosed on were done so on account of failure to stay current on the payments.
Come on CD you can get that head even further up your ass. Show me all of those instances where Banks foreclose on people who aren't late with their payments.
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.
No you just quoted me and said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
Comments
"Robo-calls" only scratch the surface of the fraud that was going on.
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
There is no way a handful of isolated incidents could have created a global economic disaster. It was certainly endemic.
Read the book. It's a quick read.
He's not going to read anything. That would take time away from his sniveling cunt act.
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
No further questions your honor.
And a Presidential Candidate definitely falls into that realm.
I"m thinking she was even halfway doable back in the day. Much like Pelosi's ample ta tas.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
So far we've got a single example of the BofA fucking up the paper work and foreclosing on a single party that wasn't behind on their mortgage. And this case was dealt with fairly quickly by the court and they not only didn't lose their home they got a judgment against BofA.
Still waiting for all of those other examples you Kunt claimed were happening all the time.
But I do love how you duped GayBob!
Completely agree with this. Lending companies should have never been issuing those loans and would have never been able to write those kinds of loans if there had never been the creation of Freddie and Fannie.
But the truth of the matter is all of mortgages that were eventually foreclosed on were done so on account of failure to stay current on the payments.
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Ok.
Then don't bail the fucking banks out afterword.