Willie Brown's concubine is a fighter.
Comments
-
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
There is so much to break down it took 1/4 of the book. I really don't want to rehash it all.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
"Robo-calls" only scratch the surface of the fraud that was going on.
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
There is no way a handful of isolated incidents could have created a global economic disaster. It was certainly endemic.
Read the book. It's a quick read.
-
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand. -
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.SFGbob said:
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
Come see Gaybob do his best Hondo in every thread.
He's not going to read anything. That would take time away from his sniveling cunt act. -
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt. -
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
No further questions your honor. -
It was easy.SFGbob said:
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ctLEGrOmf4
-
Appears Pawz just cut your legs out from underneath you dumbfuck. Your pals are all here I'm one of them will console you with an ass tonguing.CirrhosisDawg said:
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.SFGbob said:
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
Agreed. The Throbber will never deny one's right to wood hit any individual with even a remote hint of celebrity.creepycoug said:
I'd hit it. Without a doubt. It's what separates us from women. We can hit that which we hate with terrible enthusiasm. Ask @PurpleThrobber . He'll tell you.TurdBuffer said:
Fine. I'm a mysogenist then. But that doesn't change the fact that Kamala has a face like a bloodhound and a grating, whiny voice that sounds like a starving cat. And look at those man hands. JFC.
And a Presidential Candidate definitely falls into that realm.
I"m thinking she was even halfway doable back in the day. Much like Pelosi's ample ta tas.
-
And you think that story represent a significant number of all the bank foreclosures? I concede there were most certainly some rare examples where what you were claiming had occurred. Big country millions of mortgages certainly errors like that are going to be made. But that was far for normal.pawz said:
It was easy.SFGbob said:
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ctLEGrOmf4 -
That’s some mighty fine “evidence.” You’ll do better tomorrow GayBob.SFGbob said:
Appears Pawz just cut your legs out from underneath you dumbfuck. Your pals are all here I'm one of them will console you with an ass tonguing.CirrhosisDawg said:
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.SFGbob said:
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
-
Come on flea you can shove that head even further up your ass.dflea said:Come see Gaybob do his best Hondo in every thread.
He's not going to read anything. That would take time away from his sniveling cunt act.
So far we've got a single example of the BofA fucking up the paper work and foreclosing on a single party that wasn't behind on their mortgage. And this case was dealt with fairly quickly by the court and they not only didn't lose their home they got a judgment against BofA.
Still waiting for all of those other examples you Kunt claimed were happening all the time. -
It’s ok to admit you didn’t understand the topic.pawz said:
It was easy.SFGbob said:
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ctLEGrOmf4
But I do love how you duped GayBob! -
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
Completely agree with this. Lending companies should have never been issuing those loans and would have never been able to write those kinds of loans if there had never been the creation of Freddie and Fannie.
But the truth of the matter is all of mortgages that were eventually foreclosed on were done so on account of failure to stay current on the payments. -
In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it -
Come on CD you can get that head even further up your ass. Show me all of those instances where Banks foreclose on people who aren't late with their payments.
-
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it. -
-
What happens when you are selling to people without the financial literacy to understand what they are buying? Buyer beware?RaceBannon said:In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it
Ok.
Then don't bail the fucking banks out afterword.
-
Had the exact thing happen to me back in 2003. Seemed too good to be true. It was and I got a 30 year fixed instead. I was defrauded!!!!RaceBannon said:In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it -
An ARM in 87 would have been money. You would have been dumb to lock in a fixed rate in 87.RaceBannon said:In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it -
An arm in 03 was money too. The house I bought in 02 was an arm. Almost as good as my current 15 year fixed at 3%.SFGbob said:
Had the exact thing happen to me back in 2003. Seemed too good to be true. It was and I got a 30 year fixed instead. I was defrauded!!!!RaceBannon said:In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it -
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it. -
JFC.SFGbob said:
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Read the book.
Or don't. -
Wrong as usual2001400ex said:
An ARM in 87 would have been money. You would have been dumb to lock in a fixed rate in 87.RaceBannon said:In 87 the mortgage broker tried to bait and switch me to an ARM and I told him to fuck off
The listing agent found another broker
You don't have to take a bad deal and if a bad deal was all you could get you still don't have to take it -
Nice try. You're not nearly clever enuff to do rhetoric with me mochambo.SFGbob said:
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Btw ... don't you ever get tired? You argue about shit down to the blood nub of the thing like your life depends on it. Most of it, like this one, is just so fucking stupid. Like, who fucking cares about why this or that guy got foreclosed on? Does it fucking matter that you're right about that? How many key board do you go through a month?
What a sad little fucking man you must be. -
How do you square what's in the book with this statement by you?pawz said:
JFC.SFGbob said:
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Read the book.
Or don't.
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
If I've failed to make the payments on the mortgage I signed have the banks really defrauded me out of my home? The overwhelming majority of all of these foreclosures came from people who could no longer make their payments. That's kind of an odd way for a bank to "defraud" anyone.
Should the banks have been making these loans? Fuck no and under the old lending standards they never would have written up these loans. But what changed the lending standards and why did banks and mortgage companies continue to write up these loans that they knew many times weren't going to be repaid?
-
How many keyboards do you and Hondo shove up each others asses each month?creepycoug said:
Nice try. You're not nearly clever enuff to do rhetoric with me mochambo.SFGbob said:
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Btw ... don't you ever get tired? You argue about shit down to the blood nub of the thing like your life depends on it. Most of it, like this one, is just so fucking stupid. Like, who fucking cares about why this or that guy got foreclosed on? Does it fucking matter that you're right about that? How many key board do you go through a month?
What a sad little fucking man you must be. -
I say again, what a sad little fucking man you must be. Weirdo fuck.SFGbob said:
How many keyboards do you and Hondo shove up each others asses each month?creepycoug said:
Nice try. You're not nearly clever enuff to do rhetoric with me mochambo.SFGbob said:
I'll prove it about as well as you Kunts here proved that banks routinely foreclosed on mortgages of people who weren't behind in their payments. Like you they are emotional little girls who believe whatever they want to believe.creepycoug said:
This is why people always find you with three cocks: one in your mouth and one in each ear.SFGbob said:
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt.
You go from ill-fated attempts at deductive reasoning to "you know you meant" whining faster than a Kansas City faggot gets on your bare ass.
You're the one who framed your response on a "claims made" basis dumb dumb. I'm not responsible for your responses.
You're the 'prove it' guy. Prove it.
Btw ... don't you ever get tired? You argue about shit down to the blood nub of the thing like your life depends on it. Most of it, like this one, is just so fucking stupid. Like, who fucking cares about why this or that guy got foreclosed on? Does it fucking matter that you're right about that? How many key board do you go through a month?
What a sad little fucking man you must be.
