Sandmann’s suit called The Post’s coverage libelous on its face, but the judge’s opinion cited case law noting that statements must be “more than annoying, offensive or embarrassing.” They must expose the allegedly libeled party to public hatred, ridicule and contempt, among other damaging elements.
Sandmann’s suit called The Post’s coverage libelous on its face, but the judge’s opinion cited case law noting that statements must be “more than annoying, offensive or embarrassing.” They must expose the allegedly libeled party to public hatred, ridicule and contempt, among other damaging elements.
He was most certainly subjected to public hatred.
Whatever. It was definitely terrible journalism.
I only libeled the poor kid for a few hours on a renegade college football message bored. Felt bad for a few moments, but wasn't gonna apologize to any you jerks!!
Sandmann’s suit called The Post’s coverage libelous on its face, but the judge’s opinion cited case law noting that statements must be “more than annoying, offensive or embarrassing.” They must expose the allegedly libeled party to public hatred, ridicule and contempt, among other damaging elements.
He was most certainly subjected to public hatred.
Whatever. It was definitely terrible journalism.
I only libeled the poor kid for a few hours on a renegade college football message bored. Felt bad for a few moments, but wasn't gonna apologize to any you jerks!!
Sandmann’s suit called The Post’s coverage libelous on its face, but the judge’s opinion cited case law noting that statements must be “more than annoying, offensive or embarrassing.” They must expose the allegedly libeled party to public hatred, ridicule and contempt, among other damaging elements.
He was most certainly subjected to public hatred.
Whatever. It was definitely terrible journalism.
I only libeled the poor kid for a few hours on a renegade college football message bored. Felt bad for a few moments, but wasn't gonna apologize to any you jerks!!
Sandmann’s suit called The Post’s coverage libelous on its face, but the judge’s opinion cited case law noting that statements must be “more than annoying, offensive or embarrassing.” They must expose the allegedly libeled party to public hatred, ridicule and contempt, among other damaging elements.
He was most certainly subjected to public hatred.
Whatever. It was definitely terrible journalism.
I only libeled the poor kid for a few hours on a renegade college football message bored. Felt bad for a few moments, but wasn't gonna apologize to any you jerks!!
Comments
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/judge-dismisses-libel-suit-against-washington-post-brought-by-covington-catholic-high-school-student/2019/07/26/d02fd6ce-afd3-11e9-8e77-03b30bc29f64_story.html?utm_term=.aa011148103e
He was most certainly subjected to public hatred.
Whatever. It was definitely terrible journalism.
Someone seems upset.