Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Trumptard’s Wall will stop illegal drugs from flowing across our Southern border...

1246

Comments

  • Options
    sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    5 Awesomes Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hondo: “We shouldn’t be trying to secure the border”
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    That's what I thought

    Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels

    That's rational. Secure the border

    There is no argument against it

    The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?

    In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Hondo: “We shouldn’t be trying to secure the border”

    Where do you see that? Fuck you are stupid.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,356
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    That's what I thought

    Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels

    That's rational. Secure the border

    There is no argument against it

    The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?

    In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
    Spend more. That was tough

    Where is the Democrats legislation on these other items?

    That's what I thought
  • Options
    sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    5 Awesomes Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.

    If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes


    Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.

    If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.

    Fucktarded comment of the day.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,854
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.

    If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.

    I mean, does anybody really care about the Mariners any more?

    In accounting parlance, that shit needs to be impaired on society's balance sheet.

  • Options
    sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    5 Awesomes Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    T-Mobile does. and probably Ichiro
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Cost of the Wall is roughly equal to the market value of the Seahawks+ Mariners.

    If a town can field sports teams inside walls to keep the undesirables out, you’d think an entire Country could do so rather easily, if it wanted to.

    I mean, does anybody really care about the Mariners any more?

    In accounting parlance, that shit needs to be impaired on society's balance sheet.

    I know you are being sarcastic. But impairment is based on discounted future cash flows. And as long as TV revenue comes in, they are good.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,786
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    That's what I thought

    Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels

    That's rational. Secure the border

    There is no argument against it

    Hondo needs burger flippers he can underpay because he doesn't believe in the bullshit that spouts from his pie hole.
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.


  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceFS needs his butt buddy Gay Bob to come help translate his fucktarded comments into something coherent.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,356
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.


    No I don't

    Lying again I see
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,356
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    This is the "rational" argument against from @insinceredawg
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.


    No I don't

    Lying again I see
    What do you think the $5.7B is going to cover then? You dismissed Hondo's 200 miles of wall comment so I'm curious what your expectations are.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,356
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    RaceFS thinks the $5.7B Trump is shutting the government down for is going to cover the entire wall, beef up check points, and improve technology.


    No I don't

    Lying again I see
    What do you think the $5.7B is going to cover then? You dismissed Hondo's 200 miles of wall comment so I'm curious what your expectations are.
    I said spend what it takes

    The 5 billion was a compromise by Trump to get a deal for now

    Build the wall. End of story
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?

    Nah.


  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    salemcoog said:

    Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?

    Nah.


    This already has its own thread. HTH
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    2001400ex said:

    salemcoog said:

    Pelosi, Schumer and all of your heroes were for a wall and voted to fund it a few short years ago. Hell, almost half of Democrats were for a wall at the same time. But something happened to make them suddenly against it. Could it be that they all got woke?

    Nah.


    This already has its own thread. HTH
    I know facts are like cryptonite for you. I’ll try to poast the kind of BS that your mind can comprehend next time.
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    2001400ex said:

    That's what I thought

    Who is talking about 200 miles? Fund the whole wall. Beef up the checkpoints. Use tech to find tunnels

    That's rational. Secure the border

    There is no argument against it

    The $5.7 billion will only cover about 200 miles. What do you think the cost to put that wall across the whole border is?

    In other words, Trump shut down the government over something that won't have any meaningful effect on border security. I feel that's been established and you won't hear it even tho you agree with it.
    That’s just for starters. All we need to do is take the rest from the over $100 Billion per year that we spend to house, clothe, feed and treat anchor babies and their parents, aunts, uncles etc. to fund the rest.
Sign In or Register to comment.