Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pocahontas puts up

12346

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited October 2018
    So what you’re admitting is that Warren falsely referred to herself as Native American while at Harvard

    Why so Secretive?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,838 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
    That is a proven fake news source you are quoting.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
    That is a proven fake news source you are quoting.
    CNBC? Wut? Ok I'll bite. Refute the facts.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,949
    Anyone trying to spin this as anything but embarrassing is a fucking moron.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Anyone trying to spin this as anything but embarrassing is a fucking moron.

    It's embarrassing on both sides TBH. She's fucktarded for playing it off at Harvard like she's a minority. And it's embarrassing for Trump who is lying about the shit when the facts are embarrassing enough.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
    You're either a liar or moron Hondo. Warren started her tenured teaching position at Harvard in July of 1995.

    IN WHAT WOULD be her final year at the University of Texas, Warren made a decision that would come to haunt her: She listed herself in the Association of American Law Schools annual directory as a minority law professor.

    The organization debuted its list of minority law professors in the 1986-1987 edition, and Warren’s name appears in bold on page 1055 of the volume. It was listed the same way in each of the next eight editions.


    She had been calling herself a "minority" for nearly 10 years prior to her time at Harvard. Liar or dumbfuck Hondo, take your pick.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Warren’s central offense dates back to the mid 1980s, when she first formally notified law school administrators that her family tree includes Native Americans. Warren said she grew up with family stories about both grandparents on her mother’s side having some Cherokee or Delaware blood.

    That genealogical claim has zero documentary evidence to back it up, according to a PolitiFact review of news and newsletter databases back to 1986.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
    You're either a liar or moron Hondo. Warren started her tenured teaching position at Harvard in July of 1995.

    IN WHAT WOULD be her final year at the University of Texas, Warren made a decision that would come to haunt her: She listed herself in the Association of American Law Schools annual directory as a minority law professor.

    The organization debuted its list of minority law professors in the 1986-1987 edition, and Warren’s name appears in bold on page 1055 of the volume. It was listed the same way in each of the next eight editions.


    She had been calling herself a "minority" for nearly 10 years prior to her time at Harvard. Liar or dumbfuck Hondo, take your pick.
    Care to provide a link?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    edited October 2018
    Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library. The documents show that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.

    Again this was nearly 3 years prior to her becoming a tenured Professor at Harvard. So how in the fuck did they list her as a Native American back in 1992-1993 when according to you Hondo she didn't list her ethnicity until five months after she got the tenured position in 1995 Hondo?

    It's okay, you can admit you're a lying dumbfuck Hondo.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    You can say the words Hondo, you're a gullible dishonest dipshit who likes to swallow like a bitch.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    What's the "lie" Hondo? Give me a clear cut lie and not just a statement that makes your Kunt hurt. And why are you running interference for Warren's obvious lie about being a Cherokee?

    See my posts above. It's very clear the lie.

    Running interference. How cute.
    It's very clearly a statement that makes your snatch hurt. You can't show how what he said is a lie. Meanwhile, we know for a fact that Warren's statement about being a Cherokee is a complete lie. No need to rely on anyone's opinion or interpretation of that claim. It's factually incorrect and a lie.

    Trump said she never would have gotten into Harvard. Explain how that is factual.
    I love how this Kunt loves to play the exact and precise language Kunt act in order to call other people liars but how he never applies that standard to himself.

    Trump didn't say anything about her getting into Harvard dumbfuck. She wasn't trying to get into Harvard as a student. She was trying to get a job there and you have no way to show that she would have been given the job if she hadn't represented herself as a minority candidate. Harvard promoted her as a women of color and a minority, native American hire so certainly her bogus status as an Indian was important to Harvard and it definitely helped her get the job. It certainly didn't hurt her.

    How do you know she would have been given the job without that bogus minority status? You don't, therefore you can't say that Trump's statement is a lie. What we do know is a lie, is Warren's claim that she was a Cherokee.
    You are lying again.

    The Globe, however, published a report on Sept. 1 contradicting that claim. "Warren first listed her ethnicity as Native American nearly five months after she started her tenured position at Harvard and 2½ years after she was there as a visiting professor and first offered the job," the newspaper reported.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/trump-rips-elizabeth-warren-over-dna-test-on-native-american-lineage.html

    You can say the words. Trump lied. It's ok to say it.
    You're either a liar or moron Hondo. Warren started her tenured teaching position at Harvard in July of 1995.

    IN WHAT WOULD be her final year at the University of Texas, Warren made a decision that would come to haunt her: She listed herself in the Association of American Law Schools annual directory as a minority law professor.

    The organization debuted its list of minority law professors in the 1986-1987 edition, and Warren’s name appears in bold on page 1055 of the volume. It was listed the same way in each of the next eight editions.


    She had been calling herself a "minority" for nearly 10 years prior to her time at Harvard. Liar or dumbfuck Hondo, take your pick.
    Care to provide a link?
    It's linked in the source you provided dipshit.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library. The documents show that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.

    Again this was nearly 3 years prior to her becoming a tenured Professor at Harvard. So how in the fuck did they list her as a Native American back in 1992-1993 when according to you Hondo she didn't list her ethnicity until five months after she got the tenured position in 1995 Hondo?

    It's okay, you can admit you're a lying dumbfuck Hondo.

    The Globe examined hundreds of documents, many of them never before available, and reached out to all 52 of the law professors who are still living and were eligible to be in that Pound Hall room at Harvard Law School. Some are Warren’s allies. Others are not. Thirty-one agreed to talk to the Globe — including the law professor who was, at the time, in charge of recruiting minority faculty. Most said they were unaware of her claims to Native American heritage and all but one of the 31 said those claims were not discussed as part of her hire. One professor told the Globe he is unsure whether her heritage came up, but is certain that, if it did, it had no bearing on his vote on Warren’s appointment.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/09/01/did-claiming-native-american-heritage-actually-help-elizabeth-warren-get-ahead-but-complicated/wUZZcrKKEOUv5Spnb7IO0K/story.html
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Before coming to Harvard, Warren taught at the University of Pennsylvania’s law school for seven years. For at least three of those years - 1991, 1992, and 1994 - an internal publication drawing on statistics from the university’s federal affirmative action report listed one Native American female professor in the university’s law school. Penn’s library does not have a report for the year Warren was visiting at Harvard.

    Sucks when you don't even read what you linked here doesn't it Hondo. So which is it Hondo, are you a liar or dumbfuck? How does Penn list her as Native American back in 1991, when according to you, she didn't give that information out until late 1995?
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,409
    edited October 2018
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library. The documents show that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.

    Again this was nearly 3 years prior to her becoming a tenured Professor at Harvard. So how in the fuck did they list her as a Native American back in 1992-1993 when according to you Hondo she didn't list her ethnicity until five months after she got the tenured position in 1995 Hondo?

    It's okay, you can admit you're a lying dumbfuck Hondo.

    The Globe examined hundreds of documents, many of them never before available, and reached out to all 52 of the law professors who are still living and were eligible to be in that Pound Hall room at Harvard Law School. Some are Warren’s allies. Others are not. Thirty-one agreed to talk to the Globe — including the law professor who was, at the time, in charge of recruiting minority faculty. Most said they were unaware of her claims to Native American heritage and all but one of the 31 said those claims were not discussed as part of her hire. One professor told the Globe he is unsure whether her heritage came up, but is certain that, if it did, it had no bearing on his vote on Warren’s appointment.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/09/01/did-claiming-native-american-heritage-actually-help-elizabeth-warren-get-ahead-but-complicated/wUZZcrKKEOUv5Spnb7IO0K/story.html
    I'd like to see of the 31 that actually responded we her allies. I'm guessing 30? I'd like to know what the other 21 people knew. At least one person claims that her Native American heritage was brought up.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library. The documents show that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.

    Again this was nearly 3 years prior to her becoming a tenured Professor at Harvard. So how in the fuck did they list her as a Native American back in 1992-1993 when according to you Hondo she didn't list her ethnicity until five months after she got the tenured position in 1995 Hondo?

    It's okay, you can admit you're a lying dumbfuck Hondo.

    The Globe examined hundreds of documents, many of them never before available, and reached out to all 52 of the law professors who are still living and were eligible to be in that Pound Hall room at Harvard Law School. Some are Warren’s allies. Others are not. Thirty-one agreed to talk to the Globe — including the law professor who was, at the time, in charge of recruiting minority faculty. Most said they were unaware of her claims to Native American heritage and all but one of the 31 said those claims were not discussed as part of her hire. One professor told the Globe he is unsure whether her heritage came up, but is certain that, if it did, it had no bearing on his vote on Warren’s appointment.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/09/01/did-claiming-native-american-heritage-actually-help-elizabeth-warren-get-ahead-but-complicated/wUZZcrKKEOUv5Spnb7IO0K/story.html
    I'd like to see of the 31 that actually responded we her allies. I'm guessing 30? I'd like to know what the other 21 people knew. At least one person claims that her Native American heritage was brought up.
    Wut? Where did your read where it was brought up?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Before coming to Harvard, Warren taught at the University of Pennsylvania’s law school for seven years. For at least three of those years - 1991, 1992, and 1994 - an internal publication drawing on statistics from the university’s federal affirmative action report listed one Native American female professor in the university’s law school. Penn’s library does not have a report for the year Warren was visiting at Harvard.

    Sucks when you don't even read what you linked here doesn't it Hondo. So which is it Hondo, are you a liar or dumbfuck? How does Penn list her as Native American back in 1991, when according to you, she didn't give that information out until late 1995?

    What does that have to do with Trump's lie?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library. The documents show that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.

    Again this was nearly 3 years prior to her becoming a tenured Professor at Harvard. So how in the fuck did they list her as a Native American back in 1992-1993 when according to you Hondo she didn't list her ethnicity until five months after she got the tenured position in 1995 Hondo?

    It's okay, you can admit you're a lying dumbfuck Hondo.

    The Globe examined hundreds of documents, many of them never before available, and reached out to all 52 of the law professors who are still living and were eligible to be in that Pound Hall room at Harvard Law School. Some are Warren’s allies. Others are not. Thirty-one agreed to talk to the Globe — including the law professor who was, at the time, in charge of recruiting minority faculty. Most said they were unaware of her claims to Native American heritage and all but one of the 31 said those claims were not discussed as part of her hire. One professor told the Globe he is unsure whether her heritage came up, but is certain that, if it did, it had no bearing on his vote on Warren’s appointment.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/09/01/did-claiming-native-american-heritage-actually-help-elizabeth-warren-get-ahead-but-complicated/wUZZcrKKEOUv5Spnb7IO0K/story.html
    Gosh Hondo, it's almost as if you're a fucking lying Kunt who is now posting shit that doesn't respond to anything I said. You claimed she didn't list herself as Native American until after she was hired as tenured Professor at Harvard. You lied Hondo. She'd been listing herself as a minority and an Indian since the mid-80s. Telling me that 31 were either unaware of her native American status or that they didn't discuss her native American status doesn't address your fucking lie Hondo.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    She'd been identifying herself as a minority and a native American 10 years prior to getting the tenured position at Harvard, the fact that they didn't discuss her race and ethnic status means nothing. It was already a given that she was an Indian, at least that is what she had been telling people for 10 years. What was there to discuss? That's the way the game is played, they don't need to discuss anything, the minority is always given the leg up in that environment.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    She'd been identifying herself as a minority and a native American 10 years prior to getting the tenured position at Harvard, the fact that they didn't discuss her race and ethnic status means nothing. It was already a given that she was an Indian, at least that is what she had been telling people for 10 years. What was there to discuss? That's the way the game is played, they don't need to discuss anything, the minority is always given the leg up in that environment.

    Read what Trump said. Find evidence that her being listed as native American helped her get that job.

    Or call Trump a liar.
Sign In or Register to comment.