Shout-out to HondoFS...she must be a relative. Its hard to find people this nuts and dumb...it has to be genetic.
Think the best part is not remembering if she took the polygraph (less than 2 months ago) on the same day as her grandmothers funeral or not. How is a person suppose to remember that? She literally has no short-term memory, no long-term memory, but she is sure it was Kavanaugh. And the few details she does provide are all contradicted specifically by others in sworn testimony.
But there is still a 50/50 chance it will work because there are a bunch of HondoFS in the world...sad state we live in.
You read your live updating talking points memo and the second paragraph is probably copy pasta.
Nice work!!! You sure are the genius here.
Yes, you live in a simulation in which anyone who disagrees with you is working off a "talking point". And these are provided by an evil computer simulation? The people behind "chemtrails"? Trump? Please do complete your nutjob conspiracy theory...
Like I said...shout-out to you. You both are absolutely nuts...
So you watched the live stream and came up with that on your own. Ok!!!!
Shout-out to HondoFS...she must be a relative. Its hard to find people this nuts and dumb...it has to be genetic.
Think the best part is not remembering if she took the polygraph (less than 2 months ago) on the same day as her grandmothers funeral or not. How is a person suppose to remember that? She literally has no short-term memory, no long-term memory, but she is sure it was Kavanaugh. And the few details she does provide are all contradicted specifically by others in sworn testimony.
But there is still a 50/50 chance it will work because there are a bunch of HondoFS in the world...sad state we live in.
You read your live updating talking points memo and the second paragraph is probably copy pasta.
Nice work!!! You sure are the genius here.
Yes, you live in a simulation in which anyone who disagrees with you is working off a "talking point". And these are provided by an evil computer simulation? The people behind "chemtrails"? Trump? Please do complete your nutjob conspiracy theory...
Like I said...shout-out to you. You both are absolutely nuts...
Meanwhile there is no greater purveyor of the Rat party talking points than Hondo. Guy is completely blind to what a fucking hypocrite he is and when you call him on it he'll either go straight to the strawman ass fuck or start posting his bullshit.
He totally fucking lied yesterday about the four affidavits produced by Ford's attorney refuting the claims by everyone Ford said was at the party, denying any knowledge of what Ford was talking about. Now I'm willing to concede that Hondo is a fucking moron and was just confused about what the affidavits were actually claiming but then he has the gall to criticism someone else for not reading the source he provided that he obviously never read himself.
Okay, I'm no woman. I get that. But assuming everything Dr. Ford says is true, would an event like that cause her to underperform academically, not get dates, wig out in college, keep shit from her parents, spend too much time in the sun, drink too much, etc., etc., etc. Sorry, not buying it.
Read some studies on PTSD. That's exactly what happens
This is what's wrong with #MeToo IMO. Suddenly every single hangnail is the fault of the Patriarchy.
Rape = hangnail? Come on.
If nothing else, this entire process seems to prove Freud's initial conclusions that women are fucking hysterical. Period. End of story.
Speaking of hysterical... much of this insane drama is the result of Chuck Grassley saying "damn the torpedoes, we're gonna get this guy confirmed before the Senate recesses for the election. A great many bad decisions and stupid actions have resulted from the precipitate rush to confirm Kavanaugh this summer. So who's being hysterical?
Shout-out to HondoFS...she must be a relative. Its hard to find people this nuts and dumb...it has to be genetic.
Think the best part is not remembering if she took the polygraph (less than 2 months ago) on the same day as her grandmothers funeral or not. How is a person suppose to remember that? She literally has no short-term memory, no long-term memory, but she is sure it was Kavanaugh. And the few details she does provide are all contradicted specifically by others in sworn testimony.
But there is still a 50/50 chance it will work because there are a bunch of HondoFS in the world...sad state we live in.
Shout-out to HondoFS...she must be a relative. Its hard to find people this nuts and dumb...it has to be genetic.
Think the best part is not remembering if she took the polygraph (less than 2 months ago) on the same day as her grandmothers funeral or not. How is a person suppose to remember that? She literally has no short-term memory, no long-term memory, but she is sure it was Kavanaugh. And the few details she does provide are all contradicted specifically by others in sworn testimony.
But there is still a 50/50 chance it will work because there are a bunch of HondoFS in the world...sad state we live in.
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
Okay, I'm no woman. I get that. But assuming everything Dr. Ford says is true, would an event like that cause her to underperform academically, not get dates, wig out in college, keep shit from her parents, spend too much time in the sun, drink too much, etc., etc., etc. Sorry, not buying it.
This is what's wrong with #MeToo IMO. Suddenly every single hangnail is the fault of the Patriarchy.
If nothing else, this entire process seems to prove Freud's initial conclusions that women are fucking hysterical. Period. End of story.
High school party drinking and clumsy groping have never occurred prior to this incident. But being able to remember anything is normal.
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
Shout-out to HondoFS...she must be a relative. Its hard to find people this nuts and dumb...it has to be genetic.
Think the best part is not remembering if she took the polygraph (less than 2 months ago) on the same day as her grandmothers funeral or not. How is a person suppose to remember that? She literally has no short-term memory, no long-term memory, but she is sure it was Kavanaugh. And the few details she does provide are all contradicted specifically by others in sworn testimony.
But there is still a 50/50 chance it will work because there are a bunch of HondoFS in the world...sad state we live in.
You read your live updating talking points memo and the second paragraph is probably copy pasta.
Nice work!!! You sure are the genius here.
Yes, you live in a simulation in which anyone who disagrees with you is working off a "talking point". And these are provided by an evil computer simulation? The people behind "chemtrails"? Trump? Please do complete your nutjob conspiracy theory...
Like I said...shout-out to you. You both are absolutely nuts...
Meanwhile there is no greater purveyor of the Rat party talking points than Hondo. Guy is completely blind to what a fucking hypocrite he is and when you call him on it he'll either go straight to the strawman ass fuck or start posting his bullshit.
He totally fucking lied yesterday about the four affidavits produced by Ford's attorney refuting the claims by everyone Ford said was at the party, denying any knowledge of what Ford was talking about. Now I'm willing to concede that Hondo is a fucking moron and was just confused about what the affidavits were actually claiming but then he has the gall to criticism someone else for not reading the source he provided that he obviously never read himself.
Cue Hondo's Kunt act.
Again. Read for comprehension. That's not what I said.
Okay, I'm no woman. I get that. But assuming everything Dr. Ford says is true, would an event like that cause her to underperform academically, not get dates, wig out in college, keep shit from her parents, spend too much time in the sun, drink too much, etc., etc., etc. Sorry, not buying it.
Read some studies on PTSD. That's exactly what happens
This is what's wrong with #MeToo IMO. Suddenly every single hangnail is the fault of the Patriarchy.
Rape = hangnail? Come on.
If nothing else, this entire process seems to prove Freud's initial conclusions that women are fucking hysterical. Period. End of story.
Speaking of hysterical... much of this insane drama is the result of Chuck Grassley saying "damn the torpedoes, we're gonna get this guy confirmed before the Senate recesses for the election. A great many bad decisions and stupid actions have resulted from the precipitate rush to confirm Kavanaugh this summer. So who's being hysterical?
PTSD? 2 mins of groping equals 2 tours in Vietnam? Who's being ridiculous?
And @AZDuck, groping and fondling now equals Rape?
Okay, I'm no woman. I get that. But assuming everything Dr. Ford says is true, would an event like that cause her to underperform academically, not get dates, wig out in college, keep shit from her parents, spend too much time in the sun, drink too much, etc., etc., etc. Sorry, not buying it.
This is what's wrong with #MeToo IMO. Suddenly every single hangnail is the fault of the Patriarchy.
If nothing else, this entire process seems to prove Freud's initial conclusions that women are fucking hysterical. Period. End of story.
This hearing has gone poorly for Ford and her credibility, and gets worse for her the longer it goes on. No evidence, no facts, bizarre memory gaps, lies about flying, no idea who bought polygraph.
I'll stipulate Kavanaugh did all of it. Every last bit of it. When he was a 17 year old drunk, Catholic school boy, if those who oppose his nomination will stipulate that he's got a 30 year record of stellar legal work, he's qualified to be a SC Justice, and has done nothing in his adult life to question his temperament or abilities as a judge, which, by the way, is the issue before the panel.
Or can we dispense with the huge lie that this isn't about political revenge for the 2016 Election, and get fucking real, for once.
Okay, I'm no woman. I get that. But assuming everything Dr. Ford says is true, would an event like that cause her to underperform academically, not get dates, wig out in college, keep shit from her parents, spend too much time in the sun, drink too much, etc., etc., etc. Sorry, not buying it.
Read some studies on PTSD. That's exactly what happens
This is what's wrong with #MeToo IMO. Suddenly every single hangnail is the fault of the Patriarchy.
Rape = hangnail? Come on.
If nothing else, this entire process seems to prove Freud's initial conclusions that women are fucking hysterical. Period. End of story.
Speaking of hysterical... much of this insane drama is the result of Chuck Grassley saying "damn the torpedoes, we're gonna get this guy confirmed before the Senate recesses for the election. A great many bad decisions and stupid actions have resulted from the precipitate rush to confirm Kavanaugh this summer. So who's being hysterical?
PTSD? 2 mins of groping equals 2 tours in Vietnam? Who's being ridiculous?
And @AZDuck, groping and fondling now equals Rape?
Abusive sexual contact.
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency, knowingly engages in sexual contact with another person without that other person’s permission shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2244 - Abusive sexual contact
sexual contact (3)the term “sexual contact” means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;
Comments
He totally fucking lied yesterday about the four affidavits produced by Ford's attorney refuting the claims by everyone Ford said was at the party, denying any knowledge of what Ford was talking about. Now I'm willing to concede that Hondo is a fucking moron and was just confused about what the affidavits were actually claiming but then he has the gall to criticism someone else for not reading the source he provided that he obviously never read himself.
Cue Hondo's Kunt act.
https://www.elementsbehavioralhealth.com/trauma-ptsd/ptsd-2/
http://www.massmed.org/continuing-education-and-events/conference-proceeding-archive/men-s-health--pineles-pdf-(pdf)/
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
And @AZDuck, groping and fondling now equals Rape?
#Defeatedfans
Or can we dispense with the huge lie that this isn't about political revenge for the 2016 Election, and get fucking real, for once.
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency, knowingly engages in sexual contact with another person without that other person’s permission shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2244 - Abusive sexual contact
sexual contact
(3)the term “sexual contact” means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;
also
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jcop.10008
https://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/ptsd-overview/women/sexual-assault-females.asp
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583013/