Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?
There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?
There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?
There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.
Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?
There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
See... that's where all this gets interesting. There's the other accounts, his buddy's books, his buddy's girlfriend, the nominee's flat denials.
And oh by the way, there's some reasonably credible lying to Congress shit that happened pretty recently that the media doesn't care about but I do.
The Supreme Court is a big deal. I'm sure there's someone on that Federalist Society list the President has without Kavanaugh's baggage (Starr investigation, Bush AG *and* now this rapey stuff).
If I were a Repub I would drop this dude and go get one of them before it's too late. He can keep setting bad precedent at the DC circuit.
Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?
There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.
Pretty obvious response to the bullshit you're peddling Hondo. Great minds think alike
Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
Comments
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
Bull. Fucking. Shit.
This is what happens when melodrama supplants facts.
People forget that.
And oh by the way, there's some reasonably credible lying to Congress shit that happened pretty recently that the media doesn't care about but I do.
The Supreme Court is a big deal. I'm sure there's someone on that Federalist Society list the President has without Kavanaugh's baggage (Starr investigation, Bush AG *and* now this rapey stuff).
If I were a Repub I would drop this dude and go get one of them before it's too late. He can keep setting bad precedent at the DC circuit.
Need to see the meltdown
Thanks Comrade
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/report-ford-polygraph-expert-says-victims-like-ford-you-believe-them-dont-ask-specific-questions/