Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition

145791015

Comments

  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Sledog said:

    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    you clearly know nothing about polygraphs

    The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.

    Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."

    Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
    He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.

    "The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."

    Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
    who?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
    Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
    You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
    Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
    Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?

    The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    The biggest line of unbelievable bullshit I've heard in this whole drama is this: "I thought he was going to kill me."

    Bull. Fucking. Shit.

    This is what happens when melodrama supplants facts.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
    You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
    Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
    You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
    Trump won because of our comments here.

    People forget that.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    AZDuck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.
    Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends
    Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?

    The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
    See... that's where all this gets interesting. There's the other accounts, his buddy's books, his buddy's girlfriend, the nominee's flat denials.

    And oh by the way, there's some reasonably credible lying to Congress shit that happened pretty recently that the media doesn't care about but I do.

    The Supreme Court is a big deal. I'm sure there's someone on that Federalist Society list the President has without Kavanaugh's baggage (Starr investigation, Bush AG *and* now this rapey stuff).

    If I were a Repub I would drop this dude and go get one of them before it's too late. He can keep setting bad precedent at the DC circuit.

  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,948
    I want them to push him through no matter what

    Need to see the meltdown
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited September 2018

    I want them to push him through no matter what

    Need to see the meltdown

    The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    I want them to push him through no matter what

    Need to see the meltdown

    Burning the country down to own the libs is still all you've got.

    Thanks Comrade
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dude61 said:

    SFGbob said:

    Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

    There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.
    I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.
    And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.
    You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.
    Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.
    Pretty obvious response to the bullshit you're peddling Hondo. Great minds think alike
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,835 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    I want them to push him through no matter what

    Need to see the meltdown

    The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH
    Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I want them to push him through no matter what

    Need to see the meltdown

    The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH
    Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.
    Did you read what I wrote? Clearly not.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.


  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,835 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    you clearly know nothing about polygraphs

    The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.

    Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."

    Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
    He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.

    "The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."

    Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
    who?
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/experts-doubt-claim-of-truthful-polygraph-result-from-kavanaugh-accuser

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/report-ford-polygraph-expert-says-victims-like-ford-you-believe-them-dont-ask-specific-questions/
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,589 Founders Club

    As a man who is in many compromising sexual situations...I always support the guy with my mouth.

Sign In or Register to comment.