Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition
Comments
-
who?Sledog said:
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.AZDuck said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASledog said:
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Be a better poasterAZDuck said:
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me. -
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said: -
And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.SFGbob said: -
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friendsTurdBuffer said:
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said: -
fuck off
-
Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?AZDuck said:
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friendsTurdBuffer said:
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said:
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years. -
The biggest line of unbelievable bullshit I've heard in this whole drama is this: "I thought he was going to kill me."
Bull. Fucking. Shit.
This is what happens when melodrama supplants facts. -
Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.SFGbob said: -
See... that's where all this gets interesting. There's the other accounts, his buddy's books, his buddy's girlfriend, the nominee's flat denials.TurdBuffer said:
Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?AZDuck said:
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friendsTurdBuffer said:
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said:
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.
And oh by the way, there's some reasonably credible lying to Congress shit that happened pretty recently that the media doesn't care about but I do.
The Supreme Court is a big deal. I'm sure there's someone on that Federalist Society list the President has without Kavanaugh's baggage (Starr investigation, Bush AG *and* now this rapey stuff).
If I were a Repub I would drop this dude and go get one of them before it's too late. He can keep setting bad precedent at the DC circuit.
-
I want them to push him through no matter what
Need to see the meltdown -
The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTHPitchfork51 said:I want them to push him through no matter what
Need to see the meltdown -
Burning the country down to own the libs is still all you've got.Pitchfork51 said:I want them to push him through no matter what
Need to see the meltdown
Thanks Comrade -
Pretty obvious response to the bullshit you're peddling Hondo. Great minds think alike2001400ex said:
Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.SFGbob said: -
Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.2001400ex said:
The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTHPitchfork51 said:I want them to push him through no matter what
Need to see the meltdown -
Did you read what I wrote? Clearly not.Sledog said:
Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.2001400ex said:
The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTHPitchfork51 said:I want them to push him through no matter what
Need to see the meltdown -
Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/experts-doubt-claim-of-truthful-polygraph-result-from-kavanaugh-accuserAZDuck said:
who?Sledog said:
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.AZDuck said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASledog said:
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Be a better poasterAZDuck said:
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/report-ford-polygraph-expert-says-victims-like-ford-you-believe-them-dont-ask-specific-questions/ -
Pitchfork51 said:
As a man who is in many compromising sexual situations...I always support the guy with my mouth.
-
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
Now the argument is. He was a nerd. A nerd would never hurt a fly.SFGbob said:
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
The whole thing is nothing but a sham. No corroborating witnesses, in fact all the people she said were there said it didn't happen. That being said awkward teen dating isn't a crime. If every guy in high school was prosecuted for trying to round the bases but getting shut down we'd all be in jail.
-
Great melt down as always2001400ex said:
Now the argument is. He was a nerd. A nerd would never hurt a fly.SFGbob said:
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
See?RaceBannon said:
Great melt down as always2001400ex said:
Now the argument is. He was a nerd. A nerd would never hurt a fly.SFGbob said:
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
Strawman ass fucking and lying seems to be all you're good for Hondo. I never said that a nerd wouldn't hurt a fly. I said he was a nerd and that explained his horrible demeanor. Now get back in there, that strawman's asswhole isn't going to fuck itself.2001400ex said:
Now the argument is. He was a nerd. A nerd would never hurt a fly.SFGbob said:
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
The only way this has a good ending is if it turns out that he's always been completely gay and his wife is a beard.
He sure looks and acts like a genuine faggot.
Thank god Pete wasn't coaching at UW when this little tryhard nerd was graduating from high school. -
See?SFGbob said:
Strawman ass fucking and lying seems to be all you're good for Hondo. I never said that a nerd wouldn't hurt a fly. I said he was a nerd and that explained his horrible demeanor. Now get back in there, that strawman's asswhole isn't going to fuck itself.2001400ex said:
Now the argument is. He was a nerd. A nerd would never hurt a fly.SFGbob said:
The guy is a nerd, who the hell kept a daily calendar when they were 17? Better yet, who keeps those calendars? Highly organized, intelligent, obsessive compulsives. I'm sure he wasn't what would have been considered cool in school but he was most definitely a good student who if he were 17 today would be really into computers.AZDuck said:Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.
-
There is a fat ugly Cunt with a bad haircut on CNN screaming Kavanaugh is a GOP operative who is clearly lying.
Might actually be Hondo’ s sister.
-
