Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman.
Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman.
No im not wrong, Price wasnt better than Locker in any way. Sheesh and again, just tell me which way?
Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman.
No im not wrong, Price wasnt better than Locker in any way. Sheesh and again, just tell me which way?
Reading defenses, anticipating openings, throwing a catchable ball into said openings, going through progressions, throwing the ball away when appropriate...I could go on. Basically everything aside from running and throwing the ball hard to nobody.
Pete values three things above all else at QB: accuracy, reading the defense and grasping the offense. I’m not sure Price could have started for Pete but I’m damn sure Locker never would have.
Price was too slow to get out of the pocket to throw it OB. At least brown can do that. Locker would be only fucking prayer to beat Auburn. Not even close dipshits
Yeah Locker's performances against the only top shelf defense he ever faced would give me confidence in him going against Auburn. Fuck dude weren't you watching?
Price played the same gutsy style every snap and shredded defenses when he had time..sometimes when he didn't have time. He saw things on the field that Locker would never understand and Cobra would need film room equipment to grasp (but could never apply in the heat if the moment).
Price would put up huge numbers behind this line and be a legit Heisman contender. He was 10x the passer and 100x better leader on the field than either Jake.
Price WOULDNT have time vs Auburn chucky, that's the point. He'd be worse than browning. Locker could burn Auburn inside or outside Pocket, and give UW it's only chance offensively vs that DL. Again, a silly thread.
Price vs Auburn behind this line would look similar to Price vs pretty much everyone he ever faced with the shit lines Cozzetto oriduced. That's the point Pump. He was used to being harrassed and pummeled to shit, and played through it at a level we all dreamed of for Locker but never saw. Did price ever go 4-20?
One went #8 in the draft, the other not even a FA offer. Just STFU Chuck, you lost the debate...now move on to something you have a clue about
The topic is college quarterbacking, not perceived NFL potential based on physical traits. Price was in a different universe than locker as a pocket passer. Locker was a shit pick at #8. He was a shit pick before day three. History is on my side. Stats are on my side. Unbiased observation is on my side.
Chuck, please...Locker was to be drafted #1 overall as a jr BECAUSE of his ability as a pocket passer...with speed to get out of trouble. Price wasn't as good as Jake, in any 1 area as a college QB, so no, he wasnt a better college qb either.
Price was too slow to get out of the pocket to throw it OB. At least brown can do that. Locker would be only fucking prayer to beat Auburn. Not even close dipshits
Yeah Locker's performances against the only top shelf defense he ever faced would give me confidence in him going against Auburn. Fuck dude weren't you watching?
Price played the same gutsy style every snap and shredded defenses when he had time..sometimes when he didn't have time. He saw things on the field that Locker would never understand and Cobra would need film room equipment to grasp (but could never apply in the heat if the moment).
Price would put up huge numbers behind this line and be a legit Heisman contender. He was 10x the passer and 100x better leader on the field than either Jake.
Price WOULDNT have time vs Auburn chucky, that's the point. He'd be worse than browning. Locker could burn Auburn inside or outside Pocket, and give UW it's only chance offensively vs that DL. Again, a silly thread.
Price vs Auburn behind this line would look similar to Price vs pretty much everyone he ever faced with the shit lines Cozzetto oriduced. That's the point Pump. He was used to being harrassed and pummeled to shit, and played through it at a level we all dreamed of for Locker but never saw. Did price ever go 4-20?
One went #8 in the draft, the other not even a FA offer. Just STFU Chuck, you lost the debate...now move on to something you have a clue about
The topic is college quarterbacking, not perceived NFL potential based on physical traits. Price was in a different universe than locker as a pocket passer. Locker was a shit pick at #8. He was a shit pick before day three. History is on my side. Stats are on my side. Unbiased observation is on my side.
Chuck, please...Locker was to be drafted #1 overall as a jr BECAUSE of his ability as a pocket passer...with speed to get out of trouble. Price wasn't as good as Jake, in any 1 area as a college QB, so no, he wasnt a better college qb either.
Pete values three things above all else at QB: accuracy, reading the defense and grasping the offense. I’m not sure Price could have started for Pete but I’m damn sure Locker never would have.
Its 1 thing to be ignorant, yet worse to be ignorant about ones' ignorance and even worse yet be purposefully stubborn about both. Sark would have started Jake over price (he did), Pete would have started Jake over Price, as would every last coach in the cuntry.
Price was too slow to get out of the pocket to throw it OB. At least brown can do that. Locker would be only fucking prayer to beat Auburn. Not even close dipshits
Yeah Locker's performances against the only top shelf defense he ever faced would give me confidence in him going against Auburn. Fuck dude weren't you watching?
Price played the same gutsy style every snap and shredded defenses when he had time..sometimes when he didn't have time. He saw things on the field that Locker would never understand and Cobra would need film room equipment to grasp (but could never apply in the heat if the moment).
Price would put up huge numbers behind this line and be a legit Heisman contender. He was 10x the passer and 100x better leader on the field than either Jake.
Price WOULDNT have time vs Auburn chucky, that's the point. He'd be worse than browning. Locker could burn Auburn inside or outside Pocket, and give UW it's only chance offensively vs that DL. Again, a silly thread.
Price vs Auburn behind this line would look similar to Price vs pretty much everyone he ever faced with the shit lines Cozzetto oriduced. That's the point Pump. He was used to being harrassed and pummeled to shit, and played through it at a level we all dreamed of for Locker but never saw. Did price ever go 4-20?
One went #8 in the draft, the other not even a FA offer. Just STFU Chuck, you lost the debate...now move on to something you have a clue about
That's because natural ability and athleticism is like crack to NFL coaches. It's like guysm with a sub 4.3 40 tim who didn't really do shit in college ... they still get drafted in complete disproportion to their achievements.
Pete is a system QB guy, not a "let it rip" coach.
Price would be perfect for Pete right now.
Lockner would miss the easy passes like he always did and it would drive Pete crazy, which would make him crawl up Jack's ass, which would make Jack resort even more to panic and instinct and broken play QB'ing, and eventually lead to his benching.
There have been other physically-gifted QBs (although admittedly none like Lockner) who played under Pete who didn't play. Accuracy was the problem. Playing well in the system was the problem. Not the ability to throw it 80 yards from a knee.
Comments
Because he would have opened up the defense like a hooker's legs and it would be playing football downhill from there.
He would have benefitted from the Peterman discipline. He would have been awesome.
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman.
Get off the meds
Doesn't mean shit.