Locker, Price or Browning
Comments
-
Fucking locker you goofs.
Because he would have opened up the defense like a hooker's legs and it would be playing football downhill from there.
He would have benefitted from the Peterman discipline. He would have been awesome. -
Browning got big coffee cups at UW?ThomasFremont said:
Jake and I are close friends, actually. And we’re both wealthier than you. By a LOT.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
History majors dont make the kind of glue puppy makes. See Tommy, Pup hung with capitalist, wealth driven Business-economics majors in the classroomThomasFremont said:I stand with Pup on this one. I’m picking my boy Jake all day. Us history majors stick together
-
Wrong Jake. I’m NOT friends with that looser.Ice_Holmvik said:
Browning got big coffee cups at UW?ThomasFremont said:
Jake and I are close friends, actually. And we’re both wealthier than you. By a LOT.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
History majors dont make the kind of glue puppy makes. See Tommy, Pup hung with capitalist, wealth driven Business-economics majors in the classroomThomasFremont said:I stand with Pup on this one. I’m picking my boy Jake all day. Us history majors stick together
-
Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
-
for sec i thought pummpy got mod privileges caz he was chinning his own posts
-
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman. -
No im not wrong, Price wasnt better than Locker in any way. Sheesh and again, just tell me which way?chuck said:
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman. -
Reading defenses, anticipating openings, throwing a catchable ball into said openings, going through progressions, throwing the ball away when appropriate...I could go on. Basically everything aside from running and throwing the ball hard to nobody.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No im not wrong, Price wasnt better than Locker in any way. Sheesh and again, just tell me which way?chuck said:
Just agree to disagree. You're right about one thing though. Way too many hypotheticals in play and the debate is silly because of it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Price was a decent college qb, and good passer. Ok? But a lot of his big throws were "throwbacks" against pursuit. He really wasnt great at going through all of his progressions and making throws. Was he more accurate than browning? not necessarily. Did he have a stronger arm? Not close! Did he hang in pocket longer? No! Did he make better decisions? No! Did he win more games? No! In what way was he a "better' college qb? I'll agree with you if you say anything to change my mind
It's also silly because I'm right. Price was a gamer, had an under rated arm (way better than cobra), went through progressions and hung in the pocket like a trooper. He definitely regressed o er time and with wear and tear. I'll grant that. He was pathetic at the end of the come back loss at Pullman. -
Fuck u pup
Get off the meds -
Pete values three things above all else at QB: accuracy, reading the defense and grasping the offense. I’m not sure Price could have started for Pete but I’m damn sure Locker never would have.
