Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored
No.
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.
He so far has ignored my offer...
@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.
Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored
No.
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.
He so far has ignored my offer...
@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.
#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant
It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.
You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.
No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.
When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.
Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored
No.
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.
He so far has ignored my offer...
@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.
Any way to do that?
I've donated twice. Last year was the wam. And this year I will when I feel like it. I don't react to people goading me to donate. But if you want to donate for me.... Go ahead.
#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant
It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.
You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.
No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.
When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.
Give an example where I don't give "my progressive heros" the same standard.
And my spiel is correcting dumbfucks like you that say stupid shit like Obama gave Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. Or Trump's approval rating is 36% among black people.
#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant
It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.
You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.
No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.
When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.
Give an example where I don't give "my progressive heros" the same standard.
And my spiel is correcting dumbfucks like you that say stupid shit like Obama gave Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. Or Trump's approval rating is 36% among black people.
Give an example of where I talked about Obama giving billions of dollars to Iran or about Trump’s approval rating being 36%.
My criticism is relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without acknowledging Obama or Hillary.
#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant
It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.
You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.
No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.
When you hold your progressive hero’s to the same standard that you hold conservatives to (and Trump isn’t a conservative) then I’ll be interested in your take. Your entire spiel is straw mans and red herrings.
Give an example where I don't give "my progressive heros" the same standard.
And my spiel is correcting dumbfucks like you that say stupid shit like Obama gave Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. Or Trump's approval rating is 36% among black people.
Give an example of where I talked about Obama giving billions of dollars to Iran or about Trump’s approval rating being 36%.
My criticism is relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without acknowledging Obama or Hillary.
I didn't say you did say that. I said people like you. Read for comprehension.
Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored
No.
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.
He so far has ignored my offer...
@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.
Any way to do that?
I've donated twice. Last year was the wam. And this year I will when I feel like it. I don't react to people goading me to donate. But if you want to donate for me.... Go ahead.
Funny. You said that a while ago so I dropped it...and yet you still haven't ponied up.
Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored
No.
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
I offered to pay @2001400ex membership for him as long as I got to add a signature of my choosing to each of his poasts.
He so far has ignored my offer...
@DerekJohnson and @Swaye . Is it possible for me to add a signature to all of @2001400ex poasts? I don't think its right for @DerekJohnson to be footing the bill for all the spam he poasts without paying his own way, and apparently he either can't afford to do it or his partner won't allow him so I've offered to sponsor him as long as I get to add a disclaimer/signature to all of his poasts.
Any way to do that?
I've donated twice. Last year was the wam. And this year I will when I feel like it. I don't react to people goading me to donate. But if you want to donate for me.... Go ahead.
Funny. You said that a while ago so I dropped it...and yet you still haven't ponied up.
Funny how that works...
Lol it's been like 5 says and I was camping out of cell service. You probably bitch about millennials needing instead gratification.
Comments
HTH
But it does make me think the Soros machine needs to pay @DerekJohnson for his spam.
He so far has ignored my offer...
Any way to do that?
And my spiel is correcting dumbfucks like you that say stupid shit like Obama gave Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. Or Trump's approval rating is 36% among black people.
My criticism is relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without acknowledging Obama or Hillary.
Funny how that works...