CIA Admits Spying on Senate Staffers

HoustonHusky

2001400ex said:

Did anyone realize this is from 2014? I am glad that pawz and Derek stand with Diane Feinstein. It's a good look.

Was it the 2014 in the link itself that gave it away for you? Speed limit IQ...

Hey look...HondoFS still hasn’t paid up. BIG surprise...wonder if it’s because the patties aren’t flipping themselves or the partner(?) won’t let him spend the $$$.

Can I sponsor your donation to HH for the year? Would be worth it as long as I get to add a disclaimer of my choosing to every one of your poasts...

pawz

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

Kaepsknee

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

This is pretty fucked up. Spying on domestic soil is the NSA’s job!!!

Are any of you really naive enough to think this is an isolated incident though? Our privacy rights are gone and owning millions of guns didn’t stop them from doing it.

Wtf does owning guns have to do with this?

The 2A crowd insists that guns safeguard our rights. The fact that we have plenty of guns and no privacy rights from our own government spy agencies says otherwise.

There you go again Tommy, reaching like a fucking Hondo.

Ok, so you’re content with the current state of privacy rights in today’s America?

No.

2001400ex

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

ThomasFremont

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

salemcoog said:

ThomasFremont said:

This is pretty fucked up. Spying on domestic soil is the NSA’s job!!!

Are any of you really naive enough to think this is an isolated incident though? Our privacy rights are gone and owning millions of guns didn’t stop them from doing it.

Wtf does owning guns have to do with this?

The 2A crowd insists that guns safeguard our rights. The fact that we have plenty of guns and no privacy rights from our own government spy agencies says otherwise.

There you go again Tommy, reaching like a fucking Hondo.

Ok, so you’re content with the current state of privacy rights in today’s America?

No.

I didn’t think so.

USMChawk

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

Pitchfork51

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

And every time Trump does something crazy it's a direct reflection on Hillary because only could someone as shitty as her lead to a reality TV guy being the president.

2001400ex

Pitchfork51 said:

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

And every time Trump does something crazy it's a direct reflection on Hillary because only could someone as shitty as her lead to a reality TV guy being the president.

So Sark being 7 win Steve is a direct reflection on Ty. That's some FS Kim Grinolds shit right there.

2001400ex

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

#aclockworkshill doesn't want to admit it's still relevant

It's only relevant to idiots, like you, who can't respond to anything about Trump without bringing up Obama or Hillary.

You keep saying this, like it’s somehow inconceivable to compare the current President to the previous president (or against his defeated opponent); that’s a classic red herring. When Trump is getting backlash for something that happened during Obama’s presidency, it’s a relevant discussion point.

No you aren't comparing shit. When Trump does something stupid. Your news source researches the shit out of it to find something Obama did that was maybe similar. To justify Trump's actions. Remember all the shit your news source gave Obama for blaming Bush? It was FS then and it's FS now. Defend Trump's actions on their own.

RaceBannon

Hondo's embittered love affair with Hillary is the best part of this bored