Which program - should they win another NT - replace SC or ND on Mt Rushmore?


Which school should replace either ND or SC if they win a NT in the next few years?
Which program - should they win another NT - replace SC or ND on Mt Rushmore? 20 votes
Comments
-
Oklahoma47 straight
-
OklahomaIf Mt Rushmore was only about 1983 to the present, then Miami is a lock with another NT. But it's not; pre 1983 resume matters.
-
OklahomaWinsapedia doesn't do post season so this doesn't include an ass kicking in the BCS by USC over OU. SC pretty much has them in every measure
-
Oklahoma
And Bud got 31 straight from 1948- 50. Tuff.RaceBannon said:47 straight
-
OklahomaAnd USC respects us more @creepycoug
-
Oklahoma
Good data here. Pete Carroll did a lot to keep USC on Mt Rushmore. If not for him they'd be gone based on a nearly 40 year NT drought. I'm more likely to give ND the boot before USC.RaceBannon said:Winsapedia doesn't do post season so this doesn't include an ass kicking in the BCS by USC over OU. SC pretty much has them in every measure
-
Oklahoma
The problem with Crêpe is the 5 NT's since college football began in 1983. The only progrum with mor over the same time period is Bammer.RaceBannon said:And USC respects us more @creepycoug
-
USC is still very much safe. They've at least won a National Title in the 2000's. They have won 7 major bowls since 2000, and have not had one losing season since 2000.
ND on the other hand has not won a major bowl since 1991, half of this board's posters weren't alive then. They also have had 4 losing seasons since 2000. ND shouldn't really be on the mountain anymore. Oklahoma should have surpassed them a few years ago.
I get football was around before 2000, and Notre Dame's history is stellar, but you can't go 27 years without a major bowl win and be considered on Mount Rushmore. -
OklahomaND owns the head to head with OU but the rest of the stats are closing in. ND leads 8-2 including breaking the 47 game streak
But OU is far more of a recent power even if you go back to 1960 or so. ND cleaned up in the 30's and 40's which is what established them in the first place
-
Miami
Except that with a change of but one letter, they can go from being fierce to being unmanly.RaceBannon said:47 straight
That disqualifies.
That, and Miami's knack for beating them when they're holding a #1 ranking, puts Miami over OklahomA.
Sorry. I'm right. -
Miami
Less and less so.YellowSnow said:If Mt Rushmore was only about 1983 to the present, then Miami is a lock with another NT. But it's not; pre 1983 resume matters.
I have a good and natural temporal cut-off on which we could all agree: pre-integration of the gayme doesn't count, or if you must count them, they should be discounted by 1/3 or something.
When the brothers weren't allowed to play, it wasn't tuff. -
Miami
Hey, Miami REALLY respects Washington too. What with the streak and all ....RaceBannon said:And USC respects us more @creepycoug
One other tie-in: EVERYBODY with a brain knows that Miami or Washington 2000 throttle 2000 Oklahoma. That's a crappy title. -
OklahomaMiami is 4 to 3 head to head and out of the picture in everything else
-
Miami
W/o question: you get rid of the Carroll run, and the bloom is completely off the rose at SC. ND beat them something like 14 years in a row, and there were some SHITTY ND teams during that run. That's inexcusable for a rivalry gayme.YellowSnow said:
Good data here. Pete Carroll did a lot to keep USC on Mt Rushmore. If not for him they'd be gone based on a nearly 40 year NT drought. I'm more likely to give ND the boot before USC.RaceBannon said:Winsapedia doesn't do post season so this doesn't include an ass kicking in the BCS by USC over OU. SC pretty much has them in every measure
SC owes Pete a lot. -
Miami
All fare poonts.greenblood said:USC is still very much safe. They've at least won a National Title in the 2000's. They have won 7 major bowls since 2000, and have not had one losing season since 2000.
ND on the other hand has not won a major bowl since 1991, half of this board's posters weren't alive then. They also have had 4 losing seasons since 2000. ND shouldn't really be on the mountain anymore. Oklahoma should have surpassed them a few years ago.
I get football was around before 2000, and Notre Dame's history is stellar, but you can't go 27 years without a major bowl win and be considered on Mount Rushmore. -
Oklahoma
I can get behind 1970 give or take as when "modern" college football began- i.e., most of SEC integrated and unlimited substitution. But Oklahomo won 2 NT's in the 1970s so they were skrong in this era too.creepycoug said:
Less and less so.YellowSnow said:If Mt Rushmore was only about 1983 to the present, then Miami is a lock with another NT. But it's not; pre 1983 resume matters.
I have a good and natural temporal cut-off on which we could all agree: pre-integration of the gayme doesn't count, or if you must count them, they should be discounted by 1/3 or something.
When the brothers weren't allowed to play, it wasn't tuff.
Plus they have a great big on campus stadium. If you care about football at your school you have a have a stadium. BUILD YOUR OWN STADIUM AND GET AN AVATAR YOU GOD DAMNED OLIVE OIL SAVAGE!! -
OklahomaOklahoma was a major part of the integration of south / southwest football in the 60's. It took Howard and Jimmy to drag Miami there
-
OklahomaLet's say UW decides to shut down football and Pete has to find a job. Every school in America offers him, and he decides he doesn't care about anything but winning a title. Where do you think this elite coach is going?
1. Alabama - there's no better place to win
2. USC - We know Pete doesn't want to coach there, but humor me
3. tOSU - right there with anybody
So it's the fourth spot that is up for grabs. I think he's going to Oklahoma 100 years before ND. I'm not sure ND is top 10 in this metric at this point.
Bama
USC
tOSU
Oklahoma
Florida
Texas
Florida St
LSU
Michigan
Miami
ND
I get it, Rushmore is about what you've done, whereas this poast is about what you can do. But these rankings are far more pertinent. -
Miami
In all seriousness, Oklahoma is a hard program to get out of the conversation. But I'm actually impressed that Miami is as close to them as they are on several measures given how much longer Oklahoma has been a football power.RaceBannon said:Miami is 4 to 3 head to head and out of the picture in everything else
People forget that not that long b4 the stupid af SI article, in which a panicking on-cycle teenage girl thought Miami should drop football, the school itself was considering dropping the sport. That Miami is anywhere near Oklahoma in anything is almost embarrassing for Oklahoma.
Nick Saban's Dad is the real original author of what Miami would become. He's the one who first started talking local studs into staying to play for the local school rather than heading north to freeze in Ohio, Indiana and Michigan. Think Ruben Carter, back when there was no reason for a guy like that to sign on to Miami. Lou Saban is my Huckleberry.
-
OklahomaBut if we're just talking "what have you done" USC, Bama and ND are a notch about tOSU. It's the Buckeyes that are closest to losing their spot to OU on that list. Top of my head without researching it I think I'd actually take OU over tOSU.
-
Oklahoma
I think the Money, Tradition, Location future potential will always merit some consideration. Fuck SC in the face though. They are the most underperforming program in the modern history of the sport.dnc said:Let's say UW decides to shut down football and Pete has to find a job. Every school in America offers him, and he decides he doesn't care about anything but winning a title. Where do you think this elite coach is going?
1. Alabama - there's no better place to win
2. USC - We know Pete doesn't want to coach there, but humor me
3. tOSU - right there with anybody
So it's the fourth spot that is up for grabs. I think he's going to Oklahoma 100 years before ND. I'm not sure ND is top 10 in this metric at this point.
Bama
USC
tOSU
Oklahoma
Florida
Texas
Florida St
LSU
Michigan
Miami
ND
I get it, Rushmore is about what you've done, whereas this poast is about what you can do. But these rankings are far more pertinent. -
Miami
I don't buy the on-campus stadium thing for obvious reasons.YellowSnow said:
I can get behind 1970 give or take as when "modern" college football began- i.e., most of SEC integrated and unlimited substitution. But Oklahomo won 2 NT's in the 1970s so they were skrong in this era too.creepycoug said:
Less and less so.YellowSnow said:If Mt Rushmore was only about 1983 to the present, then Miami is a lock with another NT. But it's not; pre 1983 resume matters.
I have a good and natural temporal cut-off on which we could all agree: pre-integration of the gayme doesn't count, or if you must count them, they should be discounted by 1/3 or something.
When the brothers weren't allowed to play, it wasn't tuff.
Plus they have a great big on campus stadium. If you care about football at your school you have a have a stadium. BUILD YOUR OWN STADIUM AND GET AN AVATAR YOU GOD DAMNED OLIVE OIL SAVAGE!!
Real estate in Coral Gables is a little more expensive than it is in Norman. -
Oklahoma
I love winsapedia. Looks like you're rightdnc said:But if we're just talking "what have you done" USC, Bama and ND are a notch about tOSU. It's the Buckeyes that are closest to losing their spot to OU on that list. Top of my head without researching it I think I'd actually take OU over tOSU.
-
OklahomaWait - OS is till ahead
-
Oklahoma
yrRaceBannon said:Wait - OS is till ahead
Like I said, top of my head.
tOSU stays in stone but I can't imagine OU is closer to anybody on Rushmore than them. -
Miami
Pete takes Pete with him wherever he goes. So there's that.dnc said:Let's say UW decides to shut down football and Pete has to find a job. Every school in America offers him, and he decides he doesn't care about anything but winning a title. Where do you think this elite coach is going?
1. Alabama - there's no better place to win
2. USC - We know Pete doesn't want to coach there, but humor me
3. tOSU - right there with anybody
So it's the fourth spot that is up for grabs. I think he's going to Oklahoma 100 years before ND. I'm not sure ND is top 10 in this metric at this point.
Bama
USC
tOSU
Oklahoma
Florida
Texas
Florida St
LSU
Michigan
Miami
ND
I get it, Rushmore is about what you've done, whereas this poast is about what you can do. But these rankings are far more pertinent.
If he wants a title and can choose anywhere? Well, it's been show that you can win at Miami. Four guys (and almost a fifth) won a title there in my lifetime.
More talent in the very county in which you reside than you need for three programs. It's warm and in some respects is the east coast analog to USC.
Miami. -
Oklahoma
Yep. Which is why I can't imagine a worse play for him than Miami.creepycoug said:
Pete takes Pete with him wherever he goes. So there's that.dnc said:Let's say UW decides to shut down football and Pete has to find a job. Every school in America offers him, and he decides he doesn't care about anything but winning a title. Where do you think this elite coach is going?
1. Alabama - there's no better place to win
2. USC - We know Pete doesn't want to coach there, but humor me
3. tOSU - right there with anybody
So it's the fourth spot that is up for grabs. I think he's going to Oklahoma 100 years before ND. I'm not sure ND is top 10 in this metric at this point.
Bama
USC
tOSU
Oklahoma
Florida
Texas
Florida St
LSU
Michigan
Miami
ND
I get it, Rushmore is about what you've done, whereas this poast is about what you can do. But these rankings are far more pertinent.
If he wants a title and can choose anywhere? Well, it's been show that you can win at Miami. Four guys (and almost a fifth) won a title there in my lifetime.
More talent in the very county in which you reside than you need for three programs. It's warm and in some respects is the east coast analog to USC.
Miami.
Not exactly #LightSkinnedU
-
Write-in OptionThese positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.
There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed? -
Miami
I think Pete's loose approach and his ability to get the players to like him, while still being the clear alpha leader, is perfect for Miami's culture, which still bears some resemblance to the Miami of old. He's like a more hip version of Jimmy Johnson, who like Pete, identified with players on some level as a guy who grew up pore on the wrong side of the tracks. They loved him for it and played hard for him, but they also knew he was in charge and respected him. What Warren Sapp did with Dennis would not have happened on Jimmy's watch.dnc said:
Yep. Which is why I can't imagine a worse play for him than Miami.creepycoug said:
Pete takes Pete with him wherever he goes. So there's that.dnc said:Let's say UW decides to shut down football and Pete has to find a job. Every school in America offers him, and he decides he doesn't care about anything but winning a title. Where do you think this elite coach is going?
1. Alabama - there's no better place to win
2. USC - We know Pete doesn't want to coach there, but humor me
3. tOSU - right there with anybody
So it's the fourth spot that is up for grabs. I think he's going to Oklahoma 100 years before ND. I'm not sure ND is top 10 in this metric at this point.
Bama
USC
tOSU
Oklahoma
Florida
Texas
Florida St
LSU
Michigan
Miami
ND
I get it, Rushmore is about what you've done, whereas this poast is about what you can do. But these rankings are far more pertinent.
If he wants a title and can choose anywhere? Well, it's been show that you can win at Miami. Four guys (and almost a fifth) won a title there in my lifetime.
More talent in the very county in which you reside than you need for three programs. It's warm and in some respects is the east coast analog to USC.
Miami.
Not exactly #LightSkinnedU
Pete likes coaching talent and talent likes playing for Pete. Whatever trouble he might find in Miami, I don't think it would be on the field. He'd have the horses to run with and I'd like his chances for a title there.
-
Miami
Mt. Rushmore would have looked different 100 years ago. Navy and Yale would be on there somewhere.AUBURNTROJAN said:These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.
There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed?
Iron can change if there is enuff heat.