Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Which program - should they win another NT - replace SC or ND on Mt Rushmore?

1246712

Comments

  • AUBURNTROJAN
    AUBURNTROJAN Member Posts: 192
    Write-in Option

    These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.

    There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed?

    Mt. Rushmore would have looked different 100 years ago. Navy and Yale would be on there somewhere.

    Iron can change if there is enuff heat.
    I have no idea what you are referencing.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited June 2018
    Write-in Option
    Invalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Oklahoma

    Invalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.

    I'll take "People whose opinion doesn't mean shit" for 500 Alex
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,726 Founders Club
    Oklahoma
    dnc said:

    Invalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.

    I'll take "People whose opinion doesn't mean shit" for 500 Alex
    Such Turd Ferguson.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Write-in Option
    Keep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,726 Founders Club
    Oklahoma

    These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.

    There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed?

    Iron Age ended around 1st century BC. Steel is much better. But it didn't collapse like Bronze did.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,291
    Miami

    These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.

    There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed?

    Iron Age ended around 1st century BC. Steel is much better. But it didn't collapse like Bronze did.
    He has no idea what you're referencing.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,291
    Miami

    Keep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?

    People without a vested interest in discrediting football before 1998? I'll give it to you that you are at least consistent in applying your stupid standard.
    Totally agree.

    1980 or thereabouts is a much better cut-off.