Which program - should they win another NT - replace SC or ND on Mt Rushmore?
Comments
-
Write-in Option
I have no idea what you are referencing.creepycoug said:
Mt. Rushmore would have looked different 100 years ago. Navy and Yale would be on there somewhere.AUBURNTROJAN said:These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.
There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed?
Iron can change if there is enuff heat. -
Write-in OptionInvalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.
-
Oklahoma
I'll take "People whose opinion doesn't mean shit" for 500 Alexoregonblitzkrieg said:Invalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.
-
Oklahoma
Such Turd Ferguson.dnc said:
I'll take "People whose opinion doesn't mean shit" for 500 Alexoregonblitzkrieg said:Invalid pole. Neither one of those two shit programs are currently on Mt. Rushmore. Alabama, LSU, FSU and tOSU are the current top 4, having won the most national titles in the Field era. USC is an ordinary PAC 12 program that has 1 real title to its name. It hasn't been relevant for a decade and a half, and like every other ordinary PAC team, it needs an elite coach to go all the way. The other one is a piece of shit paper tiger that got destroyed by Bama and has no national titles. Whatever voted shit and tradition they have, no one cares. Win it on the field or GTFO.
-
Write-in OptionKeep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?
-
People without a vested interest in discrediting football before 1998? I'll give it to you that you are at least consistent in applying your stupid standard.oregonblitzkrieg said:Keep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?
-
Oklahoma
Iron Age ended around 1st century BC. Steel is much better. But it didn't collapse like Bronze did.AUBURNTROJAN said:These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.
There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed? -
Miami
He has no idea what you're referencing.YellowSnow said:
Iron Age ended around 1st century BC. Steel is much better. But it didn't collapse like Bronze did.AUBURNTROJAN said:These positions do not change. Once they have been set, they stay that way forever. Learn them, live them, love them.
There's a reason they are called the IRON laws. When has anything referred to as IRON ever collapsed? -
Miami
Totally agree.UW_Doog_Bot said:
People without a vested interest in discrediting football before 1998? I'll give it to you that you are at least consistent in applying your stupid standard.oregonblitzkrieg said:Keep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?
1980 or thereabouts is a much better cut-off. -
Oklahoma
Many experts now say that the Golden Age of College Football was from 1910 to 1920creepycoug said:
Totally agree.UW_Doog_Bot said:
People without a vested interest in discrediting football before 1998? I'll give it to you that you are at least consistent in applying your stupid standard.oregonblitzkrieg said:Keep toeing the party line doogs. You're making USC proud. Who the fuck puts Notre Dame and USC ahead of two programs that won multiple titles in the BCS era?
1980 or thereabouts is a much better cut-off.
#Dobie
#63nonlosingstreak
#DominatetheBattleShips




