OK. WTF?
Comments
-
Holy shit the USC deference is built in with you guysm. Subconsciously you all run around with "USC is just better at life" in your fucking heads.Gladstone said:
Why? And who will? USC, sure. Alabama as long as Saban is there (their average from 1990-2010 was 13th, FYI). Georgia? Ohio State? ND finished top 5 for 40 straight years and now average in the teens since 2010. Are we destined down this path, destined to destroy ourselves like so many programs before us? Or can we evolve fast enough to change ourselves... change our fate? Is the future truly set?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete. -
I love it when you're in the zone!PostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.
Fucking doogs.
Go! Go! Go! -
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete. -
Don’t waste your time Ute, doogs and quooks are entitled to their own set of facts89ute said:
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete. -
True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.89ute said:
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete. -
we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?YellowSnow said:
True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.89ute said:
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.
location.
success.
burgeoning poly sub culture.
... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure. -
Brian Kelly agrees.YellowSnow said:
True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.89ute said:
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.
No word yet from Brian Kelly. -
This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.animate said:
we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?YellowSnow said:
True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.89ute said:
This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.
location.
success.
burgeoning poly sub culture.
... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon. -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.PostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.
Fucking doogs.
is this some copy+paste joke from doogpound or doogman?PostGameOrangeSlices said:CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Sure.gifPostGameOrangeSlices said:dawgs206 said:
Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.
This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.
You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
GFRAA -
This needs to be pinned on the main pageGrundleStiltzkin said:
