Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OK. WTF?

245

Comments

  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    This makes no fucking sense, but OK!
    Having high expectations = wins for our DAWGS. The HAMMER will drop on 0regon.
    ok
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    Huh?
  • dawgs206dawgs206 Member Posts: 482



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.
    Doogs hate facts
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,193 Swaye's Wigwam
    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
    Sure.gif
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,193 Swaye's Wigwam

    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
    Sure.gif

    GFRAA
  • NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425

    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
    Except Rapp is most of ours favorite recruit of the last few years and he was a three star. A lot of people here had Dom Hampton as a 4/5-star even though he was rated a 3-star. But sure.
  • GaryFromTeenMomGaryFromTeenMom Member Posts: 1,370
    edited June 2018
    We are Washington!!! Everything is great.


  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260

    Who gives a fuck how much talent Pete brings inwhat the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get some OKGs with strong academispromising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to earn USC's respectcompete.

    I completely agree with each of your points. Well put.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260
    Gladstone said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Why? And who will? USC, sure. Alabama as long as Saban is there (their average from 1990-2010 was 13th, FYI). Georgia? Ohio State? ND finished top 5 for 40 straight years and now average in the teens since 2010. Are we destined down this path, destined to destroy ourselves like so many programs before us? Or can we evolve fast enough to change ourselves... change our fate? Is the future truly set?
    Holy shit the USC deference is built in with you guysm. Subconsciously you all run around with "USC is just better at life" in your fucking heads.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    I love it when you're in the zone!

    Go! Go! Go!
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    89ute said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    Don’t waste your time Ute, doogs and quooks are entitled to their own set of facts
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    89ute said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,240

    89ute said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746

    89ute said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    Brian Kelly agrees.

    No word yet from Brian Kelly.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260
    edited June 2018
    animate said:

    89ute said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.

    Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon.
  • BaldwinIVBaldwinIV Member Posts: 797

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    dawgs206 said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
    Sure.gif

    GFRAA
    is this some copy+paste joke from doogpound or doogman?
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,435


    This needs to be pinned on the main page
Sign In or Register to comment.