Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OK. WTF?

2

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    Gladstone said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Why? And who will? USC, sure. Alabama as long as Saban is there (their average from 1990-2010 was 13th, FYI). Georgia? Ohio State? ND finished top 5 for 40 straight years and now average in the teens since 2010. Are we destined down this path, destined to destroy ourselves like so many programs before us? Or can we evolve fast enough to change ourselves... change our fate? Is the future truly set?
    Holy shit the USC deference is built in with you guysm. Subconsciously you all run around with "USC is just better at life" in your fucking heads.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    I love it when you're in the zone!

    Go! Go! Go!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    Don’t waste your time Ute, doogs and quooks are entitled to their own set of facts
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,214 Founders Club
    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    Brian Kelly agrees.

    No word yet from Brian Kelly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    edited June 2018
    animate said:

    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.

    Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BaldwinIV
    BaldwinIV Member Posts: 797
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    You guys are like UW fans on doogman when Ty was hired. He took Stanford to a Rose Bowl, and this is WASHINGTON.

    Fucking doogs.

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    dawgs206 said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Did you miss the USC, BAMA, and Penn State games the past two years? Apparently we? do.

    This roster was capable of beating all of those teams with a change in offensive coordinator/philosophy.

    You retards wouldn't have even offered 3 star Myles Gaskin a scholarship
    Sure.gif

    GFRAA
    is this some copy+paste joke from doogpound or doogman?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    This needs to be pinned on the main page
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,147
    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    Gladstone said:

    creepycoug said:

    Gladstone said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:



    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    Why? And who will? USC, sure. Alabama as long as Saban is there (their average from 1990-2010 was 13th, FYI). Georgia? Ohio State? ND finished top 5 for 40 straight years and now average in the teens since 2010. Are we destined down this path, destined to destroy ourselves like so many programs before us? Or can we evolve fast enough to change ourselves... change our fate? Is the future truly set?
    Holy shit the USC deference is built in with you guysm. Subconsciously you all run around with "USC is just better at life" in your fucking heads.



    I was going off of average recruiting rankings from 1990-present. They never finished outside of the top 10. Not once. That was my point. Now run along and autist explode at someone else.
    Look, it's clear I'm jealous. I wish USC really really respected my team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    creepycoug said:

    animate said:

    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.

    Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon.
    I know you're being ironic but Seattle has a strong and diverse poly community.
    Of the sort holding the wine glass. Yes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    Is not being worked up more than just stating a simple fact. You made the playoffs, but let's be honest, Washington was not competitive against Alabama. A team can run rough shot throughout the Pac 12 conference with top 25 recruiting classes, but it's not going to win the title without special talent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,477
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    You may not get a top 10 class, but you don't need one to win a natty. You need 5 consecutive classes of at least 10 4* recruits. I think you have two in a row so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,036 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    You may not get a top 10 class, but you don't need one to win a natty. You need 5 consecutive classes of at least 10 4* recruits. I think you have two in a row so far.
    * You need 40 x 4 stars in progress + a big dick swinging, 1st round NFL type QB- e.g., Cam, Mariota or Watson. We signed 9 four stars in 2017 and 11 in 2018 so we are getting closer to the required metric.
    Or a weak all over the place playoff field. Which can happen but isn't likely with current blue-bloods such as Ohio State and Alabama rolling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    You may not get a top 10 class, but you don't need one to win a natty. You need 5 consecutive classes of at least 10 4* recruits. I think you have two in a row so far.
    * You need 40 x 4 stars in progress + a big dick swinging, 1st round NFL type QB- e.g., Cam, Mariota or Watson. We signed 9 four stars in 2017 and 11 in 2018 so we are getting closer to the required metric.
    This is very true, but like doog bot said, it isn't good enough to beat the blue bloods when it matters most.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,214 Founders Club
    greenblood said:

    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    greenblood said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    If you are satisfied with PAC 12 titles and constantly getting outclassed in the college playoff then you are correct. But you aren't a serious natty contender without a top 10 class. You will not compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and Clemson's of the world. Look no further than Eugene. Oregon played for two National Titles, and were physically destroyed in both. They almost lucked into a title against Auburn, but then got assaulted on live TV against Ohio State.


    We had a solid run and made the fucking playoff with a bunch of borderline top 25 classes.

    Our most recent class was #13ish (yeah ESPN is retarded) and everyone here was in hysterics with how good it was.

    You fucking idiots are missing the point, like usual. UW has a big time uphill battle with the recruiting service rankings, and frankly we should be just fine with a bunch of classes similar to the 2018 class. Yeah maybe some classes are better, but some will be worse too. Until we win a fucking natty or have 5 years of NY6 bowls in a row that is going to be reality.

    Getting players like Rapp, Gaskin, Sid Jones, Gaines, etc. doesnt boost the fucking class rankings, but those are elite players that this program needs to get. Pretty much the only position groups we need to get better at recruiting to win are on offense, OL and WR.

    But by all means keep getting all worked up about the decisions of 16 and 17 year old kids. Dumbasses.
    You may not get a top 10 class, but you don't need one to win a natty. You need 5 consecutive classes of at least 10 4* recruits. I think you have two in a row so far.
    * You need 40 x 4 stars in progress + a big dick swinging, 1st round NFL type QB- e.g., Cam, Mariota or Watson. We signed 9 four stars in 2017 and 11 in 2018 so we are getting closer to the required metric.
    This is very true, but like doog bot said, it isn't good enough to beat the blue bloods when it matters most.
    It's the 2016 Clemson metric. Oregon had the QB in 2014 but wasn't a 40 four star kids "in progress" on the roster. I think Auburn in 2010 might have been a little shy of 40 four stars, but they had Cam and were playing Oregon who would have been well below 40 four stars.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GaryFromTeenMom
    GaryFromTeenMom Member Posts: 1,370
    edited June 2018
    *toots approximately three 6" lines of Lexapro*
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    AtomicDawg said:

    creepycoug said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    creepycoug said:

    animate said:

    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.

    Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon.
    I know you're being ironic but Seattle has a strong and diverse poly community.
    Of the sort holding the wine glass. Yes.
    Danny Shelton is from Hawaii and he loved it here. You don’t know shit.
    I was told there were no safe spaces here. You seem to feel unsafe.

    This is a sissy boy town. Everybody knows it.

    And Shelton is a bust, so whatever.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    creepycoug said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    creepycoug said:

    animate said:

    YellowSnow said:

    89ute said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Who gives a fuck what the class ranking is? Other than the idiots on this board. Get promising recruits in positions of need and coach then up...hopefully they won't see the field until their RS-Sophomore year.

    UW is never going to consistently finish Top 10 and it doesn't need to in order to compete.

    This gets you Wisconsin success. I used to think like this (along with most of my Utah fan base) and could never figure out why we would start out 6-0, then finish 6-6. You can build a good team by coaching up 0-3 star recruits but you can't build a team that can withstand losing 6-10 starters in November. Case in point, remember that frosh you had playing on the RT side of the line when you played Alabama? One weak link and it's over.
    True, but UW has been recruiting far better than UW over the past number of seasons. UW probably will never be able to breakthrough and win a NT with their 3 star talent. We? just might be able to stock pile enough 4 star guys to have a chance.
    we'll also get a chance or two or three to pick up a "5* star* kid each year with sustained success. You hear this Pete!?

    location.
    success.
    burgeoning poly sub culture.
    ... and your usual sprinkling of try hard white kids to give DDY high blood pressure.
    This place is so unpoly is hilarial. Poly's eat Spam. Seattle people eat tofu. Poly kids are fat and big boned. Seattle men wear skinny jeans.

    Bad fit kids. Go to Oregon.
    I know you're being ironic but Seattle has a strong and diverse poly community.
    Of the sort holding the wine glass. Yes.
    For the record South Seattle is full of poly's and not the wine glass kind. Washington has the largest poly population(and densest) in the US besides the actual Island Communities and California. By all means, keep talking about how Ewgene is a mecca for diversity. I'm sure they have a saimin noodle shop adjacent to the Lane Transit Bus Hub or whatever.
    Uhh Utah and Alaska have higher poly percentages than we? do per that link. But yes our Polypulation is higher than either of theirs are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter