Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
I remember you saying the Benghazi and emails were a red herring and a fishing expedition. You do realize it's the exact same shit, right?
Reality is they are just trying to find a way to get Trump under oath. And they don't care if it's about Russia, a porn star, or his small hands.
Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
Actually, it's the opposite of that. It's a government being willing to pursue criminal charges against the man at the top. Something you'd have never seen in REAL communism.
Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
Actually, it's the opposite of that. It's a government being willing to pursue criminal charges against the man at the top if he is a Republican. Something you'd see in REAL communism. Opposition is not allowed.
Checks and balances ftw.
The concept of checks and balances is buried under the ample ass of Hillary and the man boobs of Obama
Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
Actually, it's the opposite of that. It's a government being willing to pursue criminal charges against the man at the top if he is a Republican. Something you'd see in REAL communism. Opposition is not allowed.
Checks and balances ftw.
The concept of checks and balances is buried under the ample ass of Hillary and the man boobs of Obama
Not going to argue that it hasn't been abused under prior administrations and especially Obama's Justice Dept.
That doesn't mean it's obsolete and worth discarding.
Finally!!!! The smoking gun we've all been waiting for.
Legal Plans to build in Russia .
And an alleged settlement with a hooker for something that happened 10 years before election day.
Ken Starr is finally gonna get his pound of flesh.
Finally? You think this signals the end of the trump legacy? We only have Ryan’s tax plan and McConnell’s Supreme Court nominee. Remember how we were going to burn it all down? Immigration reform? Trade reform? Infrastructure investment? NATO reform? Such a shame to see it all go down in flames. MAGA?
Are you emphasizing that Hillary's lawyer didn't get raided? Who's side are you on?
That's actually a fair question. I'm not privy to the details of what Jack or Jill are learning in this investigation, and of course nobody with nothing better to do than poast here is either. So with that in mind I'm entirely agnostic about the whole thing, as I was with Hillary, who, again, is not my first choice of people with whom I'd like to hang out.
All I know is that after a bazillion years of investigation and interrogating and $$ spent, Gowdy didn't deliver me a corpse. She was stupid af with the server business ... that's all I know. Call her negligent. Grossly negligent. If it was criminal negligence, then I guess she should be in jail. She's not. Benghazi was a circus and is the battle cry of the stupid. She may not be my first choice to deal with the next shit sandwich in the Middle East, but jail time would've been ridiculous for that one.
Here, same thing. I have no clue what they guy is looking for really, or what he's found. If a bunch of R's gave the ok to hit T's lawyer's office unannounced out of concern he would destroy evidence, I'll reserve judgment until I hear chirping, at which point I'll question the integrity of everyone involved. At some point, this (Mueller) is like the Trey Gowdy show: do something, or move on. It's been long enough.
But @Gawd's question is a fair one: are Trump's HCH groupies upset that his attorney's office was raided? Or upset that Hillary's wasn't? Is it the raiding that isn't ok with you? Or the lack of it last time around?
I honestly don't have a dog in this fight. I don't have these days the time it takes to track this thing with any degree of rigor. Fuck, HCH is arguably my primary news source, so it's up to you degenerates. Don't let me down.
Are you emphasizing that Hillary's lawyer didn't get raided? Who's side are you on?
That's actually a fair question. I'm not privy to the details of what Jack or Jill are learning in this investigation, and of course nobody with nothing better to do than poast here is either. So with that in mind I'm entirely agnostic about the whole thing, as I was with Hillary, who, again, is not my first choice of people with whom I'd like to hang out.
All I know is that after a bazillion years of investigation and interrogating and $$ spent, Gowdy didn't deliver me a corpse. She was stupid af with the server business ... that's all I know. Call her negligent. Grossly negligent. If it was criminal negligence, then I guess she should be in jail. She's not. Benghazi was a circus and is the battle cry of the stupid. She may not be my first choice to deal with the next shit sandwich in the Middle East, but jail time would've been ridiculous for that one.
Here, same thing. I have no clue what they guy is looking for really, or what he's found. If a bunch of R's gave the ok to hit T's lawyer's office unannounced out of concern he would destroy evidence, I'll reserve judgment until I hear chirping, at which point I'll question the integrity of everyone involved. At some point, this (Mueller) is like the Trey Gowdy show: do something, or move on. It's been long enough.
But @Gawd's question is a fair one: are Trump's HCH groupies upset that his attorney's office was raided? Or upset that Hillary's wasn't? Is it the raiding that isn't ok with you? Or the lack of it last time around?
I honestly don't have a dog in this fight. I don't have these days the time it takes to track this thing with any degree of rigor. Fuck, HCH is arguably my primary news source, so it's up to you degenerates. Don't let me down.
Are you emphasizing that Hillary's lawyer didn't get raided? Who's side are you on?
That's actually a fair question. I'm not privy to the details of what Jack or Jill are learning in this investigation, and of course nobody with nothing better to do than poast here is either. So with that in mind I'm entirely agnostic about the whole thing, as I was with Hillary, who, again, is not my first choice of people with whom I'd like to hang out.
All I know is that after a bazillion years of investigation and interrogating and $$ spent, Gowdy didn't deliver me a corpse. She was stupid af with the server business ... that's all I know. Call her negligent. Grossly negligent. If it was criminal negligence, then I guess she should be in jail. She's not. Benghazi was a circus and is the battle cry of the stupid. She may not be my first choice to deal with the next shit sandwich in the Middle East, but jail time would've been ridiculous for that one.
Here, same thing. I have no clue what they guy is looking for really, or what he's found. If a bunch of R's gave the ok to hit T's lawyer's office unannounced out of concern he would destroy evidence, I'll reserve judgment until I hear chirping, at which point I'll question the integrity of everyone involved. At some point, this (Mueller) is like the Trey Gowdy show: do something, or move on. It's been long enough.
But @Gawd's question is a fair one: are Trump's HCH groupies upset that his attorney's office was raided? Or upset that Hillary's wasn't? Is it the raiding that isn't ok with you? Or the lack of it last time around?
I honestly don't have a dog in this fight. I don't have these days the time it takes to track this thing with any degree of rigor. Fuck, HCH is arguably my primary news source, so it's up to you degenerates. Don't let me down.
Hmmm....
Well, do you expect me to give up my HCH free time? Not on your fucking life.
Reading the tea leaves, this tells me they are terrified of the mid term elections. Why else would they make such desperate moves like this as well as YouTube Google overplaying their hand with tyrannical censorship? They're terrified of something.
Ummm, the Democrats are going to absolutely crush the midterms.
It's the script.
They have nothing to be terrified of.
I'm far more conservative than liberal, but this move tells me they actually have something on Trump. Which isn't exactly shocking.
I think its a red herring and a fishing expedition. The fact a judge granted this warrant is terrifying, criminal and like something from 1930s Soviet Union or Maoist China
Actually, it's the opposite of that. It's a government being willing to pursue criminal charges against the man at the top. Something you'd have never seen in REAL communism.
Checks and balances ftw.
No, it's a government being willing to discredit and try to take down the man at the top because his presidency was never approved or supported by them. It's the duty of the people to overthrow such governments.
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. -- Abraham Lincoln
Comments
At least that's what Fox News and Russian Trolls told me. For some reason, they seem to be the only people who know the truth!
Maybe you shouldn't. What with all this evidence of collusion bringing us to Stormy Daniels the story is fucking huge
Reality is they are just trying to find a way to get Trump under oath. And they don't care if it's about Russia, a porn star, or his small hands.
Checks and balances ftw.
That doesn't mean it's obsolete and worth discarding.
To have the same folks that scoffed at the law for 8 years set up this charade is beyond the pale
Not saying it isn't an attack on the republic.
Don't twist.
All I know is that after a bazillion years of investigation and interrogating and $$ spent, Gowdy didn't deliver me a corpse. She was stupid af with the server business ... that's all I know. Call her negligent. Grossly negligent. If it was criminal negligence, then I guess she should be in jail. She's not. Benghazi was a circus and is the battle cry of the stupid. She may not be my first choice to deal with the next shit sandwich in the Middle East, but jail time would've been ridiculous for that one.
Here, same thing. I have no clue what they guy is looking for really, or what he's found. If a bunch of R's gave the ok to hit T's lawyer's office unannounced out of concern he would destroy evidence, I'll reserve judgment until I hear chirping, at which point I'll question the integrity of everyone involved. At some point, this (Mueller) is like the Trey Gowdy show: do something, or move on. It's been long enough.
But @Gawd's question is a fair one: are Trump's HCH groupies upset that his attorney's office was raided? Or upset that Hillary's wasn't? Is it the raiding that isn't ok with you? Or the lack of it last time around?
I honestly don't have a dog in this fight. I don't have these days the time it takes to track this thing with any degree of rigor. Fuck, HCH is arguably my primary news source, so it's up to you degenerates. Don't let me down.
Behave yourself. We've been doing so well. Homie.
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. -- Abraham Lincoln