Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
It's hard:
Stanford 7-2 Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
Holy fuck you are retarded.
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
It's hard:
Stanford 7-2 Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
Holy fuck you are retarded.
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
More education for your fucktarded ass:
A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria: Conference winning percentage Number of conference wins
Two-team ties
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
It's hard:
Stanford 7-2 Washington 7-2
Washington State 6-3
South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
Holy fuck you are retarded.
All nine conference games matter.
Go back to Doogman where you belong.
No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford?
God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants.
Under the current rules if a North team gets beat by every South division opponent they play but beats every other North team that team wins the North division. Those are the fucking rules bitch. Sorry you're fucking dumb and didn't know that.
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship
Anyone with a competitive bone in their body can't complain about having a chance h2h on the field and the winner moves on. NOBODY. Unless of course you're still looking for a participation ribbon for posting on HHH.
Comments
If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship
Anyone with a competitive bone in their body can't complain about having a chance h2h on the field and the winner moves on. NOBODY. Unless of course you're still looking for a participation ribbon for posting on HHH.