Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OFFICIAL Huskies-Cougars Game Thread

1171820222328

Comments

  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,698 Founders Club

    I can see the gif request now.

    Already done!
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    Does anyone know where to find stats for how far Brownings passes have been tonight? I barely remember 3 passes going over 5 yards. It's pathetic that a JR and a Senior QB are two of the worst players on the field.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,698 Founders Club
  • SECisKingSECisKing Member Posts: 915
    Pulling all the trick plays I see
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    when did browning learn how to shovel pass?
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,664 Standard Supporter
    brownsocks has taken a couple for the team today
  • NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,423
    Kamari Pleasant is in the game. But Browning is still in. God damn it.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.

    It's hard:

    Stanford 7-2
    Washington 7-2

    Washington State 6-3
    South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
    Holy fuck you are retarded.

    All nine conference games matter.

    Go back to Doogman where you belong.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,698 Founders Club
    He wasn't punching for the football.
  • GilbystaintGilbystaint Member Posts: 1,061
    Keep eating the clock.
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,132

    He wasn't punching for the football.


    You don't know that . - Cuog.



    Having said that - that is what desperation looks like.
  • LaZorisLaZoris Member Posts: 1,675 Standard Supporter
    could be a snap hook here
  • NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,423

    He wasn't punching for the football.

    Normally I would agree, but these Wazzu players are so shit at everything he genuinely might not have known the play was over...
  • spudenspuden Member Posts: 358
    Desperation is a stinky cologne.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.

    It's hard:

    Stanford 7-2
    Washington 7-2

    Washington State 6-3
    South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
    Holy fuck you are retarded.

    All nine conference games matter.

    Go back to Doogman where you belong.
    No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
    More education for your fucktarded ass:

    A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria:

    Conference winning percentage
    Number of conference wins


    Two-team ties

    If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.

    http://pac-12.com/article/2014/11/06/pac-12-football-championship-game-tiebreaker-explanation
  • GilbystaintGilbystaint Member Posts: 1,061
    2 for fuckin' 2.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,698 Founders Club

    He wasn't punching for the football.

    Normally I would agree, but these Wazzu players are so shit at everything he genuinely might not have known the play was over...
    Okay, that made me chuckle.
  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,726 Swaye's Wigwam
    Cuog tears are delicious.

    If they keep cheap shotting someone better knock a gray fuck out Blount style.
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419

    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.

    It's hard:

    Stanford 7-2
    Washington 7-2

    Washington State 6-3
    South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
    Holy fuck you are retarded.

    All nine conference games matter.

    Go back to Doogman where you belong.
    No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
    More education for your fucktarded ass:

    A series of tiebreakers are used to determine which two teams match up in the Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Final standings in each division are ordered top to bottom (with the top team in each division playing for the title) based on the following criteria:

    Conference winning percentage
    Number of conference wins


    Two-team ties

    If two teams are tied for a division championship, head-to-head results between those two teams are used as a tiebreaker to decide who participates in the Football Championship Game.

    http://pac-12.com/article/2014/11/06/pac-12-football-championship-game-tiebreaker-explanation
    ignore him like everyone else dude
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    BallzDeep said:

    Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.

    It's hard:

    Stanford 7-2
    Washington 7-2

    Washington State 6-3
    South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
    Holy fuck you are retarded.

    All nine conference games matter.

    Go back to Doogman where you belong.
    No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
    So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford?

    God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants.
Sign In or Register to comment.