Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Da fuq?

15681011

Comments

  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,228




    It looks like MikeDamone thinks you're a faggot.

    If he has time to go around flagging my posts then he's a bigger buttfuck than you are, and that takes some doing.

    Be sure to tell him I said that next time you're smoking his pole.



  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,029 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Imagine how much cooler the shoot out at the OK corral would have been with Glocks and AR's instead of six shooters and double barrels.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,861

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Imagine how much cooler the shoot out at the OK corral would have been with Glocks and AR's instead of six shooters and double barrels.
    Way less fucking cool
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited November 2017
    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,487 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    It is?
    It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?
    Nope
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    It is?
    It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?
    Nope
    So people don't have the capacity to kill a mass amount of game animals.

    It somehow makes sense for deer, but for people it's the worst thing ever.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,487 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Queery: Why is it illegal to hunt with a 30 round magazine?

    It is?
    It is in a ton of states. Do you know why?
    Nope
    So people don't have the capacity to kill a mass amount of game animals.

    It somehow makes sense for deer, but for people it's the worst thing ever.
    Thanks
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    Then why aren't you saying you should have full access to fully automatic weapons?

    How does a background check infringe your gun ownership?

    Why do you support felons not owning a gun?
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited November 2017
    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?

    Also, we keep our M-4s on semi in the military, for the most part.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,029 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?

    Also, we keep our M-4s on semi in the military, for the most part.
    I like this wording better: That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

    Doesn't say the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    Then why aren't you saying you should have full access to fully automatic weapons?

    How does a background check infringe your gun ownership?

    Why do you support felons not owning a gun?
    How did a background check prevent the incident in question?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?

    Also, we keep our M-4s on semi in the military, for the most part.
    Idiots don't know that full auto is not very useful. Lets keep it that way!
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter

    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Not military grade. They're not select fire but semi auto only. What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having trouble understanding? One could easily wreak that done havoc with a pistol inside a crowded building with limited mobility or escape routes.
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?

    Also, we keep our M-4s on semi in the military, for the most part.
    I like this wording better: That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

    Doesn't say the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.
    Fotunately that's not what it says.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Sledog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    doogie said:



    Shooter knew he was braking the law. Did it anyway.

    A System existed to effectively stop this man from buying guns anyway via legal sources.

    The failure of a Government input clerk stopped the system from triggering this criminal.

    Military grade weaponry shouldn't be available to the public.
    Military grade weaponry is exactly what the 2nd amendment is about. Its not for hunting. Its really about the ability to resist tyrany.

    There is always a means to an end and you can't outlaw everything. Trucks and guns are it at the moment. A while ago it was pressure cookers and fireworks. Imagine a fuel truck.
    Do you feel like there is less tyranny now that everyone owns a high capacity, automatic weapon?

    To me, it seems like tyranny is at the same level it always is and these military grade weapons are just being used to wipe out hordes of people.
    Tyranny is always held at bay by an armed populace. Glad that you think it's not that big of a threat which means it's working as intended.

    Quad bitches!
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,849
    Eventually taking measures to protect dozens of Americans from being massacred should trump taking away the fun of unloading 30 rounds in 3 seconds at a target in the woods. You’d think that Congress would have gotten it after the mother of all turkey shoots happened in Vegas. The sad thing is that they still trot out the same tired statement when it happened again Sunday. I guess if it doesn’t happen to your family friends or coworkers than it didn’t happen at all.

    Citizens being armed with assault rifles will never stop tyranny in this day and age. If our government wanted to crack down on us, they could do it anytime.

    AR 15s have two functions in life. To unload a bunch of rounds with some buddies in the woods. Or to mow down innocent Americans out living their life.

    So considering that, who in their right mind can still support further legal purchase of these weapons?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,029 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    Eventually taking measures to protect dozens of Americans from being massacred should trump taking away the fun of unloading 30 rounds in 3 seconds at a target in the woods. You’d think that Congress would have gotten it after the mother of all turkey shoots happened in Vegas. The sad thing is that they still trot out the same tired statement when it happened again Sunday. I guess if it doesn’t happen to your family friends or coworkers than it didn’t happen at all.

    Citizens being armed with assault rifles will never stop tyranny in this day and age. If our government wanted to crack down on us, they could do it anytime.

    AR 15s have two functions in life. To unload a bunch of rounds with some buddies in the woods. Or to mow down innocent Americans out living their life.

    So considering that, who in their right mind can still support further legal purchase of these weapons?

    To your point about shooting guns in the woods, why not allow people to have access to an AR-15 at some private, well regulated shooting range, where the weapon must be locked up after use and not allowed off the premises? I mean for fuck's sake, what possible scenario/s exists where an individual needs more than a handgun or 12 gauge pump to protect their home from intruders? It's so remote that you have higher odds of being struck by lightning.

    The who prevention of tyranny argument is the most FS of them all. The issue of militias vs the federales was settled on the battlefield between 1861- 65 and the feds won. And that was in an era of extremely crude weapons technology where the feds didn't have much better firepower other than a few Henry Rifles and some Gatling Guns.
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,248 Swaye's Wigwam
    salemcoog said:

    Eventually taking measures to protect dozens of Americans from being massacred should trump taking away the fun of unloading 30 rounds in 3 seconds at a target in the woods. You’d think that Congress would have gotten it after the mother of all turkey shoots happened in Vegas. The sad thing is that they still trot out the same tired statement when it happened again Sunday. I guess if it doesn’t happen to your family friends or coworkers than it didn’t happen at all.

    Citizens being armed with assault rifles will never stop tyranny in this day and age. If our government wanted to crack down on us, they could do it anytime.

    AR 15s have two functions in life. To unload a bunch of rounds with some buddies in the woods. Or to mow down innocent Americans out living their life.

    So considering that, who in their right mind can still support further legal purchase of these weapons?

    It was a private citizen armed with an AR-15 that stopped the shooter in Texas. Government failed to do its job on multiple levels in allowing the shooting to happen in the first place.
Sign In or Register to comment.