Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Da fuq?

1235711

Comments

  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,028

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    For starters:

    Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist and I Maoist are explicitly atheist. While Communism replaces religious-centering & trappings with state-centricism and symbols, and "state as religion" can be used as shorthand to describe it, they are not theist. God or gods are transcendent and outside of the state, and thus cannot be tolerated. Same with Nazism. I believe to be a member of the SS, you must be a sworn atheist.
    From family experience, I know this to be untrue
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    Fun fact, only 10% of the US is atheist. Are you really claiming they kill at 7 times the rate of Christians?

    If you need a book of fairy tales to keep you from raping and murdering, consider suicide.
    That would mean 90% of the country is Christian, with some Muslims, Hindus and other minority religions mixed in. That's minority from a numbers standpoint, so don't twist. Total bullshit figure.
    image

    I was being generous with the 10%.
    Nice cut and paste from the first chart you found on google search that confirms your fake narrative. If 70 percent of the country were actually Christian, Obama never would have become president and the democrats would never win another election. Simple logic.

    image
    I've read a lot of stupid shit on this board. I've posted a lot of stupid shit. You sir, just won the most fucktarded post in history.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,487 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    For starters:

    Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist and I Maoist are explicitly atheist. While Communism replaces religious-centering & trappings with state-centricism and symbols, and "state as religion" can be used as shorthand to describe it, they are not theist. God or gods are transcendent and outside of the state, and thus cannot be tolerated. Same with Nazism. I believe to be a member of the SS, you must be a sworn atheist.
    From family experience, I know this to be untrue
    Chinteresting. It's something I've read in last year, didn't research farther than that. Hence the qualifier.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,029 Founders Club

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    For starters:

    Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist and I Maoist are explicitly atheist. While Communism replaces religious-centering & trappings with state-centricism and symbols, and "state as religion" can be used as shorthand to describe it, they are not theist. God or gods are transcendent and outside of the state, and thus cannot be tolerated. Same with Nazism. I believe to be a member of the SS, you must be a sworn atheist. You contradicted yourself within the same sentence. Replacing belief in deities with state religion/ politics as religion is not atheism. There's still a quasi-religious aspect going on here with how Hitler and Stalin were "deified" by those populations. Furthermore as Chris Hitchens once put it, there was "“reservoir of religious credulity,” at play in both of those countries which made it easy to be servile to those new regimes.

    Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way)
    Culturally, perhaps. But theological anti-Semitism in any systematic way, no. Nazis only tolerate the Catholic, Lutheran and other Christian churches within Germany as far as they could corrupt them. Point being anti-Semitism in Europe didn't come from some sort of atheist belief. Whether it was more cultural or theological is irrelevant. Anti-Semitism in the West has its roots in the Western Christian tradition. Sure, the Roman Catholic Church wasn't persecuting Jews anymore by the mid 20th century like had occurred during the inquisition, but as I referenced earlier, the official church position on the role of the Jews in the killing of Christ did not change until 1965.

    Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism.
    Over the whole course of human history, who knows. In the era of mechanized, industrialized warfare, the atheist regimes have certainly made up ground.
    Well, the Thirty Years War (i.e., Europe's bloodiest religious war) likely killed a far greater percentage of Europe's population that WWII. WWI was the start of industrialized warfare, and German Empire, Russian Empire, Austrian Empire, were all officially Christian nations who thought the Christian God was on their side and before proceeding to slaughter each other on an amazing scale. You don't get WWII w/o WWI
    Bold poast. Key word 'percentage.' Unbolded it to highlight because it's central to your argument twist.
    Killing as a percentage of total population and/or military age population is a better metric.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    2001400ex said:

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    Fun fact, only 10% of the US is atheist. Are you really claiming they kill at 7 times the rate of Christians?

    If you need a book of fairy tales to keep you from raping and murdering, consider suicide.
    That would mean 90% of the country is Christian, with some Muslims, Hindus and other minority religions mixed in. That's minority from a numbers standpoint, so don't twist. Total bullshit figure.
    image

    I was being generous with the 10%.
    Nice cut and paste from the first chart you found on google search that confirms your fake narrative. If 70 percent of the country were actually Christian, Obama never would have become president and the democrats would never win another election. Simple logic.

    image
    I've read a lot of stupid shit on this board. I've posted a lot of stupid shit. You sir, just won the most fucktarded post in history.
    Winners win.
  • RedRocketRedRocket Member Posts: 1,527

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    Religion involves deity worship and people are not gods, so your cult of personality as a religion argument is invalid. Hitler was a cult of personality figure, people worshipped him as if he were a god, but Hitlerism was not a religion. It revolved around a living person, a human. Himmler tried to create a state religion based on Norse mythology but failed, it never took off.

    There's no need to refute your argument regarding the communists, they were avowed athiests, all we need to do is take them at their word. Stalin and Mao, like Hitler, were cult of personality figures. Stalinism and Maoism don't qualify as religions. The Nazis and Communists, whose movements originated in socialism, both attempted to remove religion from the fabric of society. These were both atheistic movements at their core. Taken together, they are responsible for most of history's murders.
    Last I checked Mohammed was a human. You don't think Islamocucks are part of a wildly successful personality cult that's found a way to persist and expand for hundreds of years? A religion is an old cult or a cult is a new religion.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,487 Standard Supporter
    RedRocket said:

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    Religion involves deity worship and people are not gods, so your cult of personality as a religion argument is invalid. Hitler was a cult of personality figure, people worshipped him as if he were a god, but Hitlerism was not a religion. It revolved around a living person, a human. Himmler tried to create a state religion based on Norse mythology but failed, it never took off.

    There's no need to refute your argument regarding the communists, they were avowed athiests, all we need to do is take them at their word. Stalin and Mao, like Hitler, were cult of personality figures. Stalinism and Maoism don't qualify as religions. The Nazis and Communists, whose movements originated in socialism, both attempted to remove religion from the fabric of society. These were both atheistic movements at their core. Taken together, they are responsible for most of history's murders.
    Last I checked Mohammed was a human. You don't think Islamocucks are part of a wildly successful personality cult that's found a way to persist and expand for hundreds of years? A religion is an old cult or a cult is a new religion.
    There is no God but God, and Mohammed is His prophet.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,861
    BearsWiin said:

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    For starters:

    Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist and I Maoist are explicitly atheist. While Communism replaces religious-centering & trappings with state-centricism and symbols, and "state as religion" can be used as shorthand to describe it, they are not theist. God or gods are transcendent and outside of the state, and thus cannot be tolerated. Same with Nazism. I believe to be a member of the SS, you must be a sworn atheist.
    From family experience, I know this to be untrue
    Lol

    Pretty sure my Grandfather was Lutheran or Catholic or some shit


    But he was not in the SS. Just a run of the mill German soldier. Don't twist.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,028

    BearsWiin said:

    Fun fact: most murderers are athiest. Just ask Dahmer. He claimed in interviews it was the lack of permanent consequences for his actions, deriving from atheism, that made it ok in his mind to commit his horrible deeds. And most atheists identify with the left wing -socialists/democrats/communists/nazis. Yeah, you read that right, nazis. They were socialists: https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian

    Remove the threat of permanent consequences for peoples' actions on Earth and anything goes. Everything is ok, everything is permitted, including murder. And the left wing murdered on a massive scale in Europe and elsewhere. Both Communism and Nazism were radical athiest movements that originated on the left. You might not like religion, but it can act as a buffer zone to keep peoples' worst behavior in check. The exception is Islam, which specifically incites murder and instructs its followers to kill in the name of Allah.

    OBK you ignorant slut, what the fuck is this shit? Far more people have been killed for religious reasons in human history than anything remotely having to do with atheism or agnosticism. Where do you think the Nazi's got their anti-Semitism from? I'm sure it just came about in a vacuum and had nothing to do with 2000 years of Roman Catholic theology (Hitler was a baptized Catholic by the way). Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Bull shit stretch
    Where am I wrong exactly?
    All over the place.
    Clean it up guys. "Bull shit stretch" or "All over the place" are not valid arguments. The points I made above are historically accurate.
    For starters:

    Furthermore, Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc., were not atheistic movements, rather, they just replaced Christianity (or whatever the national religion was) with gods (personality cults) of a different kind.
    Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist and I Maoist are explicitly atheist. While Communism replaces religious-centering & trappings with state-centricism and symbols, and "state as religion" can be used as shorthand to describe it, they are not theist. God or gods are transcendent and outside of the state, and thus cannot be tolerated. Same with Nazism. I believe to be a member of the SS, you must be a sworn atheist.
    From family experience, I know this to be untrue
    Lol

    Pretty sure my Grandfather was Lutheran or Catholic or some shit


    But he was not in the SS. Just a run of the mill German soldier. Don't twist.
    Grandfather was Wehrmacht, great uncle was an SS officer
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html

    Are you talking to yourself?

    And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
    Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.

    LOL. Look at you pretending that white terrorists are the only ones with mental issues.
    You are correct. Islam is a mental issue.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,029 Founders Club
    edited November 2017
    Swaye said:

    I'll take my freedom with a side of tits.

    image

    Is that a bump / burp stock or whatever the fuck they call it?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html

    Are you talking to yourself?

    And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
    Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.
    You are clearly confusing the ability to purchase versus the ability to possess. There are many legal ways for people to buy guns who are not allowed to possess guns. Why do you think it violates the second amendment to require background checks on all purchases?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,228 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2017
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html

    Are you talking to yourself?

    And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
    Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.
    You are clearly confusing the ability to purchase versus the ability to possess. There are many legal ways for people to buy guns who are not allowed to possess guns. Why do you think it violates the second amendment to require background checks on all purchases?
    Prohibited people are prohibited from purchase or possession. You should know this. Blame the US military. He passed the background check. So as always your Soros talking points are bullshit.


    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/air-force-didnt-report-texas-shooters-domestic-violence-conviction-to-federal-database-allowing-him-to-buy-guns.html
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    I'm right but there is nothing unusual about that.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/texas-church-shooting-who-is-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley.html

    Are you talking to yourself?

    And he was able to legally purchase the weapon. Even tho US law says he can't. Imagine if we were to close gun show, internet, and private sale loopholes.
    Imagine if someone present had a gun. You can't stop these types of people from obtaining weapons. You can shoot them dead.
    You are clearly confusing the ability to purchase versus the ability to possess. There are many legal ways for people to buy guns who are not allowed to possess guns. Why do you think it violates the second amendment to require background checks on all purchases?
    Prohibited people are prohibited from purchase or possession. You should know this. Blame the US military. He passed the background check. So as always your Soros talking points are bullshit.


    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/06/air-force-didnt-report-texas-shooters-domestic-violence-conviction-to-federal-database-allowing-him-to-buy-guns.html
    You didn't answer the question.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.

    LOL. Look at you pretending that white terrorists are the only ones with mental issues.
    You are correct. Islam is a mental issue.
    Just like all the other religions.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110
    Dude61 said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    Dishonorable discharge for domestic abuse is a felony. He was not legally entitled to own a gun, and the 22,000 gun laws currently on the books did not prevent him from obtaining one.

    One thing that will never be discussed is if he was on SSRI's:

    https://ssristories.org/

    He had a bad conduct discharge which wouldn't have affected his ability to purchase a gun.

    He did have a domestic assault charge however, but that was erroneously left out of the database.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/us/texas-shooting-church.html
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Dude61 said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Evil nut bags exist. Fortunately some local showed up and shot at the pussy gunman who dropped his gun and ran.

    Terrorists.

    The word is terrorists.


    Hope this helps.
    That would depend on his motives which we don't know at this point. Did you call Ted Bundy a terrorist?
    He killed 26 people at a church. What motive do you want?
    Dishonorable discharged from the military. Bet money he had issues mentally and socially and probably on psych drugs. Most of these mass shooters are.
    Dishonorable discharge for domestic abuse is a felony. He was not legally entitled to own a gun, and the 22,000 gun laws currently on the books did not prevent him from obtaining one.

    One thing that will never be discussed is if he was on SSRI's:

    https://ssristories.org/

    He had a bad conduct discharge which wouldn't have affected his ability to purchase a gun.

    He did have a domestic assault charge however, but that was erroneously left out of the database.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/us/texas-shooting-church.html
    so, Coaches had the right play call but the players failed to execute?
Sign In or Register to comment.