So what do we want?
Comments
-
But how does your TBS obsession make you a retarded doog?Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is why the playoff is FS.whuggy said:
No way man. You're playing to win it all.Dennis_DeYoung said:I don't want any fucking part of the playoff. I hate it on every level. It's stupid and awful.
Also - I want to be somewhere where we can recruit within 1000 miles of there. Fiesta, Holiday whatever. This team is not going to win a Natty - so let's go max benefit.
No ribbons. Everything but the playoffs
is exhibition football.
We aren’t winning the playoff shit head. Would you like to one day? Yes, me too.
As such, we need to recruit about 50% better than we have been.
Now that we’ve got the right coach, we need the horses.
Anyone here who thinks we have a shot to win the playoff this year is a fucking moron.
The main reason we cannot Win the playoff this year is we don’t have the talent. Like it or lump it, it’s the truth.
For so long around here, the scales got so tilted toward “coaching is all that matters” because when you have shitty coaches, it’s true - it really doesn’t make a fuck bit of difference who you recruit.
However, when you have the RIGHT coaches (which we overwhelmingly do), it makes all the difference in the world.
If we had talent closer to USC’s rather than being closer to Iowa’s, we would be the UGA of the West. But as it stands now, we are the Wisconsin of the West because everyone knows that if we run into a top tier talent team, we will get stuffed. Like we did vs USC and Bama last year.
So while I’m not opposed to cutting my dick off, cut your own shit off if you don’t think that the thing separating us from entering the talent sphere where Clemson is now (which is achievable; we will never be in the same talent tier as Bama or USC) shouldn’t be the top priority of the program.
I am happy to take bets on our chances at winning the Natty this year... want them? Of course not.
So, all this shit is just symbolic posturing. -
I truly fucking hate youjhfstyle24 said:UW cannot win the playoff this year. The better scenario is to win out, get left out along with Oklahoma/TCU for Notre Dame, and cause a massive uproar that changes the shitty system.
-
Holy shit. What are you doing here?Dennis_DeYoung said:I don't want any fucking part of the playoff. I hate it on every level. It's stupid and awful.
Also - I want to be somewhere where we can recruit within 1000 miles of there. Fiesta, Holiday whatever. This team is not going to win a Natty - so let's go max benefit.
You should try Dawgman. It's more your speed. -
I don't see how making the playoffs and finishing the year with a top 4 ranking, even if we lose, would be worse for recruiting than winning a lower tier bowl game.
Playing an elite team in the playoffs would also be a good experience all around...for example, players and coaches can see first-hand how they play against better talent. -
-
I get where DDY and Coker's pee-pees are aiming on the recruiting front. But the recruiting game and areas are changing and I don't think their conclusions will hold true much longer as attention towards bowels wanes, and the playoffs expand to 8 teams, which is going to happen. Follow the money.Fenderbender123 said:I don't see how making the playoffs and finishing the year with a top 4 ranking, even if we lose, would be worse for recruiting than winning a lower tier bowl game.
Playing an elite team in the playoffs would also be a good experience all around...for example, players and coaches can see first-hand how they play against better talent. -
Let’s be clear ... winning out and going back to back as PAC Champs is the prime priority
I will never say that not being in the Final Four is better than being in the Final Four
UW will be a tough out because of the defense ...
But I’d also be lying if I said UW was in a better position to win 2 games this year versus last year -
So is your pee-pee aligned with your other two TSIO Sandusky acolytes, or not?
-
It usually isn’tTurdBuffer said:So is your pee-pee aligned with your other two TSIO Sandusky acolytes, or not?
-
And for the record, if I didn't know better, I'd think your TSIO pals were gay, pedos, or both. Wait...
-
I’m assuming Kevin Spacey will be joining the TSIO podcast sometime in the near future.TurdBuffer said:And for the record, if I didn't know better, I'd think your TSIO pals were gay, pedos, or both. Wait...
-
Look at you implying Spacey and Coker aren't the same person.CheersWestDawg said:
I’m assuming Kevin Spacey will be joining the TSIO podcast sometime in the near future.TurdBuffer said:And for the record, if I didn't know better, I'd think your TSIO pals were gay, pedos, or both. Wait...
-
The fuck was I thinking?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Look at you implying Spacey and Coker aren't the same person.CheersWestDawg said:
I’m assuming Kevin Spacey will be joining the TSIO podcast sometime in the near future.TurdBuffer said:And for the record, if I didn't know better, I'd think your TSIO pals were gay, pedos, or both. Wait...
https://youtu.be/0RAlrzcdfRY
