Willie Taggart
Comments
-
Hi @SwayeSwaye said:
I keep getting alerts and am too stoopid to figure out how to turn them off.WilburHooksHands said:
I don't know watching Mosster quook and a few kill yourselfs every couple posts is underrated.Swaye said:I hate this thread so much.
-
Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
-
So you are saying you think unfavorably of Taggart?PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS. -
When do we get to start calling Peterson “7”PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
Just kidding. I like to joke with you guys. Last night was just a hiccup in your march to an injury free, undefeated rest of the season.
I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD ASU defense. -
You might be the best troll the Duck fan base has ever produced.MikeSeaver said:
When do we get to start calling Peterson “7”PineapplePirate said:Willie Taggart.
Willie Faggart.
Willie Fucking Faggart.
Willie Fucking Fags.
AIDS.
Just kidding. I like to joke with you guys. Last night was just a hiccup in your march to an injury free, undefeated rest of the season.
I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD ASU defense. -
I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich. -
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still.
-
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
yeah, but it's more fun with Helfirchgreenblood said:
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
Can't argue with thatAZDuck said:
yeah, but it's more fun with Helfirchgreenblood said:
Mariota butt-blasted Peterman 45-20 not Helfrich. That game was also much more competitive than 70-21AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
Butt-blasted implies something going into the butt not out of it.AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still.
-
That's an enemaRedRocket said:
Butt-blasted implies something going into the butt not out of it.AZDuck said:
Helfrich butt-blasted Peterman to the tune of 45-20, butt whose countinbg?greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
I agree though - LIFPO still. -
STarting this thread was one of the shittiest decisions of my life.
-
What are some of the other ones?Swaye said:STarting this thread was one of the shittiest decisions of my life.
-
Which is saying something. No offense meant.Swaye said:STarting this thread was one of the shittiest decisions of my life.
-
@AzDuck YBFEE
-
MikeSeaver said:
What are some of the other ones?Swaye said:STarting this thread was one of the shittiest decisions of my life.
-
Until you get married...Swaye said:STarting this thread was one of the shittiest decisions of my life.
-
I feel like I should respond to this thread so that @Swaye gets another couple of notifications.
-
We should probably also switch over to the @Swaye avatar soon.PurpleBaze said:I feel like I should respond to this thread so that @Swaye gets another couple of notifications.
-
I was going to switch to the @Swaye avatar, but @RaceBannon beat me to it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We should probably also switch over to the @Swaye avatar soon.PurpleBaze said:I feel like I should respond to this thread so that @Swaye gets another couple of notifications.
-
It's always fun when we pick the same one though.PurpleBaze said:
I was going to switch to the @Swaye avatar, but @RaceBannon beat me to it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We should probably also switch over to the @Swaye avatar soon.PurpleBaze said:I feel like I should respond to this thread so that @Swaye gets another couple of notifications.
-
I did like the plunger devil though. Somehow it fit your HCH persona well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's always fun when we pick the same one though.PurpleBaze said:
I was going to switch to the @Swaye avatar, but @RaceBannon beat me to it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We should probably also switch over to the @Swaye avatar soon.PurpleBaze said:I feel like I should respond to this thread so that @Swaye gets another couple of notifications.
-
I don't think you can evenly compare Peterman and Willie in apples to apples from day one. Sark was a fucktard, but that gaggle of NFL players UW sent out last year were his recruits. Slingblade left a very little depth and talent.greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
Herbert, Freeman, Dye, and Mondeau were the only guys back from last year that weren't turds. I think all four of them are better this year than before. There are 13 true freshman either starting or playing meaningful snaps which speaks to the lack of quality depth. I see a ton of positives in those young guys, but they can't be counted on to be consistent and win. Next year I would expect at least 23 redshirt and true freshman to play heavily spread out over both sides of the ball.
The penalties suck, but there is a lot of evidence that first year coaches end up with a lot of turnovers and penalties when they take over for a loser. Next year they need to come way down.
I see Willie being just like the rest of the Harbaugh clan; great recruiters, tough players, and overrated. Once the thing gets rolling 8 wins will be an average year and once every recruiting cycle the Ducks will be a serious player in the conference/playoff race. That works for me. That's all Oregon was before the Chip Kelly anomaly that wouldn't have lasted as the game quickly adapted to it. -
Solid jack quook take.Mosster47 said:
I don't think you can evenly compare Peterman and Willie in apples to apples from day one. Sark was a fucktard, but that gaggle of NFL players UW sent out last year were his recruits. Slingblade left a very little depth and talent.greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
Herbert, Freeman, Dye, and Mondeau were the only guys back from last year that weren't turds. I think all four of them are better this year than before. There are 13 true freshman either starting or playing meaningful snaps which speaks to the lack of quality depth. I see a ton of positives in those young guys, but they can't be counted on to be consistent and win. Next year I would expect at least 23 redshirt and true freshman to play heavily spread out over both sides of the ball.
The penalties suck, but there is a lot of evidence that first year coaches end up with a lot of turnovers and penalties when they take over for a loser. Next year they need to come way down.
I see Willie being just like the rest of the Harbaugh clan; great recruiters, tough players, and overrated. Once the thing gets rolling 8 wins will be an average year and once every recruiting cycle the Ducks will be a serious player in the conference/playoff race. That works for me. That's all Oregon was before the Chip Kelly anomaly that wouldn't have lasted as the game quickly adapted to it. -
what's a jack quook (or duck)?
-
God you are fucking retarded.oregonblitzkrieg said: -
Because there can only be one.BallzDeep said:
Cupboard bare when he got there, check.Mosster47 said:
I don't think you can evenly compare Peterman and Willie in apples to apples from day one. Sark was a fucktard, but that gaggle of NFL players UW sent out last year were his recruits. Slingblade left a very little depth and talent.greenblood said:I'm still LIPO with Taggart. I know Sark defenders talked about how TY left the cupboards bare, but seriously, Slingblade left Taggart with a 5th string running back and a reserve wide receiver/safety as backup quarterbacks. That still doesn't excuse the 49 point drubbing the defense took. I will say though, Slingblage gave up 52 last year at home to Stanford, and he had an offense with a pulse.
I still think this is a 7 win team. Which is what most reasonable quooks expected. Peterson lost a few times in his first couple years at UW as well, but I'll add that he never got blasted 49-7, but I'll also add that I don't think Taggart is on the same level as Peterson either.
In the end, LIPO. As log as they continue to improve year over year, I'm good with Taggart. Even with the issues the last couple games, I still see a better overall unit than I did at any time last year under Helfrich.
Herbert, Freeman, Dye, and Mondeau were the only guys back from last year that weren't turds. I think all four of them are better this year than before. There are 13 true freshman either starting or playing meaningful snaps which speaks to the lack of quality depth. I see a ton of positives in those young guys, but they can't be counted on to be consistent and win. Next year I would expect at least 23 redshirt and true freshman to play heavily spread out over both sides of the ball.
The penalties suck, but there is a lot of evidence that first year coaches end up with a lot of turnovers and penalties when they take over for a loser. Next year they need to come way down.
I see Willie being just like the rest of the Harbaugh clan; great recruiters, tough players, and overrated. Once the thing gets rolling 8 wins will be an average year and once every recruiting cycle the Ducks will be a serious player in the conference/playoff race. That works for me. That's all Oregon was before the Chip Kelly anomaly that wouldn't have lasted as the game quickly adapted to it.
Massive attrition, check.
Selling the shit out of early playing time to recruits, check.
Hyped up recruiting tactics in which multiple recruits commit within one weekend to reserve themselves a scholarship as they continue to consider other schools a.k.a. "recruiting massacres", check.
Commits who continue to take other visits, check
Playing a shit load of young players, check.
Affinity for dual threat QB's, check.
Wants to call the offensive plays himself, check.
A team that is massively undisciplined and leads the nation in penalties, check.
A coach that is okay with his starting QB running through defenders instead of protecting himself (Locker, Herbert), check.
How the fuck is Taggart not Black Sark?
(Of each race I mean)
