Hillary Clinton: "We Should Abolish the Electoral College..."

Kaepsknee

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

well, it isn't like you give a shit what the Federales say on your guns n' religion compound anyway, but both Houses of Congress as constituted favor rural over urban dwellers in terms of voting power, as well as the other unwritten archaic practice that the two rural states of Iowa and New Hampshire have an outsized voice in who gets to be Prez in the first place... so...

Again, you wouldn't be swapping tears and cum with dhdawg if your candidate would have won.

check the facts. I was arguing this shit with @MikDabone before Hills even got nominated

sure.gif

YellowSnow

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

Kaepsknee

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

They aren't subsidizing the farmer, they subsidize the food you eat. Now go back to your topicalchica handle and poast a shitty pole. It's your wheel house.

PurpleThrobber

<

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

You like to eat, right?

Swaye

dhdawg said:

Notice how in every other country the candidate who gets 3 million more votes wins. Crazy right?
We already have an electoral college anyway. It's called the Senate

Things losers say.

RaceBannon

Scott Woodward once tried to schedule Electoral College

CirrhosisDawg

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

Truth. Those who benefitted the most from the magnanimous act of reclaiming, irrigating and powering the west, at considerable cost to the taxpayer, now posture as "self reliant" superiority guy. They don't seem to grasp their bread is buttered by the taxpayer. Do they like to eat?

YellowSnow

salemcoog said:

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

They aren't subsidizing the farmer, they subsidize the food you eat. Now go back to your topicalchica handle and poast a shitty pole. It's your wheel house.

There you go again KaiserKewg - your ability to miss the point never ceases to amaze. No shit, BOR and Army Corps projects help subsidize the cost of food production; I never said anything implying that wasn't the case. But those farmers are also earning a pretty nice living as a result of tax payer subsidized cheap water. And I don't have a problem with them doing so, per say. My observation here is that if you live in fucking rural American you need to understand a little of the history of how you get to exist out there in the first place and quite hating on the federales so much. Who built the dams? Not private enterprise. Who brought the electrical grid and roads the rural parts of the US? It was big fucking guvmint, paid for with city slicker tax dollars.

YellowSnow

PurpleThrobber said:

<

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

You like to eat, right?

Do you like big tits?

YellowSnow

salemcoog said:

YellowSnow said:

PurpleThrobber said:

AZDuck said:

it would be nice if people rather than acreage decided who runs the country

(yes, I had to edit that. it takes time to be pithy)

I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose - but those people who live in 'the country' don't much like city folks telling them how to manage their lands from behind desks.

Them cunty folk's hypocrisy about big guvmint makes me laff from time to time. Us here city slickers are the ones that subsidize their roads, schools, etc. If you're a farmer that irrigates at all in WA, CA, ID, etc, all that infrastructure came from big government boondoggles and they only pay pennies on the dollar for the actual cost of the water.

They aren't subsidizing the farmer, they subsidize the food you eat. Now go back to your topicalchica handle and poast a shitty pole. It's your wheel house.

This is essential reading by the way, if you want to dig a little deeper into the subject.